Recurrent pregnancy loss: a shared stressor---couple-orientated psychological research findings.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the psychological impact of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) on affected men and women and to determine risk and protective factors in both partners. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: University-affiliated fertility center. PATIENT(S): Ninety female/male couples and 14 women. INTERVENTION(S): Participants completed a questionnaire covering psychological risk factors (ScreenIVF), experience of pregnancy losses, coping strategies, and partnership satisfaction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Comparison of psychological risk factors, perception of RPL, and coping strategies between both partners and analysis of the influence of risk and protective factors. RESULT(S): In the ScreenIVF, 47.7% of women versus 19.1% of men showed a risk for anxiety, 51.7% versus 19.1% a risk for depression, and 28.1% versus 30.7% a risk for limited social support. The use of avoiding coping styles seems to be less favorable with regard to the psychological risk than active strategies. Having a child together and a satisfying partnership correlated with a lower risk for depression. Sharing the experience of RPL with others and being in a satisfying relationship correlated with a higher social support. CONCLUSION(S): Both men and women affected by RPL show high risks for developing depression and anxiety, underlining the importance of also including the male partners. The factors of communication with others, a satisfying relationship, and already having a child together correlate with decreased psychological risks. We advocate for health care professionals to implement screening for anxiety, depression, and social support for both partners and support them in dealing with RPL. REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), number DRKS00014965.

Two of a kind? Immunological and clinical risk factors differ between recurrent implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage.

Recurrent miscarriage (RM) and recurrent implantation failure (RIF) are unsolved challenges in reproductive medicine. Whether RIF patients share the same risk factors as RM patients is a matter of debate. Besides clinical factors, immune alterations are discussed in both conditions. The scope of this study was to compare the prevalence of clinical and immunological risk factors in a large cohort of RM and RIF patients. Between 11/2011 and 02/2019, 613 RM and 185 RIF patients were included. A screening for anatomical malformations, endocrine, autoimmune, prothrombotic and parental chromosomal disorders was performed. The immune status was assessed using flow cytometry analysis of peripheral lymphocyte subpopulations and uterine natural killer cells (uNK cells) using immunohistochemistry. RM patients showed a higher rate of intrauterine adhesions and elevated antinuclear antibodies ≥ 1:160 (p < 0.05). A higher prevalence of submucous fibroids and increased factor VIII levels were observed in RIF patients (p < 0.05). The prevalence of an antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS) was low and did not differ between the two groups. RIF patients had higher numbers of peripheral regulatory T-cells (p < 0.05). Significant more RIF patients were diagnosed with elevated uNK cells (p < 0.05). Differences in clinical and immunological risk factors of RM and RIF patients reflect different entities. Lower Tregs in RM and higher uNK cells in RIF patients might be related to the previous exposure of the immune system to fetal cells. The low prevalence of an APLS indicates a potential overestimation of this factor in the pathophysiology of RM and RIF.