Comprehensive analysis of stereotactic Radiosurgery outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer patients with brain metastases: The influence of immunotherapy and prognostic factors.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer stands as the second most common solid tumors with a propensity for brain metastasis. Among metastatic breast cancer cases, the brain metastasis incidence ranges from 10 % to 30 %, with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) displaying a heightened risk and poorer prognosis. SRS has emerged as an effective local treatment modality for brain metastases; however, data on its outcomes specifically in pure triple-negative subtype remain scarce. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all brain metastasis (BM) TNBC patients treated with SRS. Patient, tumour characteristics and treatment details data were collected. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate local control (LC), distant brain metastasis free survival (DBMFS), and overall survival (OS) outcomes in TNBC patients undergoing SRS for brain metastases while identifying potential prognostic factors. RESULT: Forty-three patients with TNBC and brain metastases treated with SRS between January 2017 and 2023 were included. The study found rates of LC (99 % at 1 year) and DBMFS (76 % at 1 year) after SRS, with brain metastasis count (p = 0,003) and systemic treatment modality (p = 0,001) being significant predictors of DBMFS. The median OS following SRS was 19.5 months, with neurological deficit (p = 0.003) and systemic treatment modality (p = 0.019) identified as significant predictors of OS. CONCLUSION: SRS demonstrates favourable outcomes in terms of local control and distant brain metastasis-free survival in TNBC. Neurological deficit and systemic treatment significantly influence overall survival, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment approaches and (magnetic resonance imaging) MRI surveillance based on these factors.

A new perspective on the future of Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology: Young Radiation Oncologists Group (TROD/GROG 001).

Radiation oncology is a field of medicine that has been rapidly growing with advances in technology, radiobiology, treatment algorithms and quality of life of modern radiotherapy over the last century. In the context of these advances, it is critical to be aware of the role of the young radiation oncologists and enable them to discover new perspectives. For this purpose, "The Young Radiation Oncologists Group" (GROG) has been established by the Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology (TROD), a subgroup which has focused on the professional developments, early career and integrating into the TROD family while supporting education and innovative research of young radiation oncologists. The purpose of this paper was to outline the structure and responsibilities of GROG and its scientific and social activities within TROD and in its own right.

The Predictive Value of Baseline Volumetric PET/CT Parameters on Treatment Response and Prognosis in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic effects of baseline volumetric PET/CT parameters including the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG) on treatment response and prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). METHODS: Between 2015 and 2018, 51 patients with LARC treated with NACRT followed by surgery were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into 2 groups by tumor regression grade (TRG) as follows: group I = TRG 1 (no detectable cancer cells) + TRG 2 (single cells and/or small groups of cancer cells) and group II = TRG3 (residual tumor outgrown by fibrosis) + TRG 4 (remarkable fibrosis outgrown by tumor cells) + TRG 5 (no fibrosis with extensive residual cancer). RESULTS: Of the 51 patients, 34 (66.7%) were male. The median age was 55 (range, 37-78) years. According to TRG status, 14 (27.4%) patients were in group I and 37 (72.6%) patients were in group II. The area under the curve (95% CI) was 0.749 (0.593-0.905) in the ROC curve plotted for MTV. The cut-off value for MTV was 12, with 70% sensitivity and 65% specificity. MTV was ≥ 12 in 32 (62.8%) patients. MTV and TLG values were significantly different between groups I and II, whereas there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of SUVmax values (p = 0.006, p = 0.033, and p = 0.673, respectively). The disease-free survival was not reached in patients with MTV < 12 vs. 20 months in those with MTV ≥ 12 (p = 0.323). In multivariate analysis, MTV (OR, 95% Cl, 5.00 [1.17-21.383]) was found to be the factor that affected pathological complete response. CONCLUSION: In LARC treated with NACRT, MTV prior to treatment can help predict the response to treatment.

The efficacy and tolerability of ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy in low-intermediate risk prostate cancer patients: single center experience.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (UHRT) in the treatment of low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted using data derived from 44 patients who underwent UHRT, and toxicity assessment and clinical response were investigated. Treatment consisted of 35-36.25 Gy in 5 fractions using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with the Linac-based delivery system. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 52 months (8-68 months) and the median age was 71.5 years (54-85 years). Twenty-seven patients were assigned as intermediate-risk, whereas 17 patients had low-risk. The 5-year overall survival rate was 87.8%, while the 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) rate was 97.4%. Acute grade 3 genitourinary (GU) side effect was not observed in any patient, whereas acute gastrointestinal (GI) system grade 3 side effect was seen in 6.8% of the patients. Late grade 3 GU and GI side effects were seen in 4.6% and 6.8% of the patients, respectively. In patients with planning target volume (PTV) ≥85 ml, acute grade ≥2 GU side effects were more common (p=.034). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated that UHRT administered with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) can be recommended for selected patients with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. Further prospective, multicentric, controlled trials on larger series are warranted to reach more accurate conclusions.

The impact of tumor regression grade on long-term survival in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic effect of tumor regression grade (TRG) on long-term survival in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: Medical records of 182 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, who were treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery between 2002 and 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. TRG was classified into five categories based on the pathological response as follows - TRG1: no viable cancer cell, TRG2: single cancer cell or small groups of cancer cells, TRG3: residual tumor outgrown by fibrosis, TRG4: residual tumor outgrowing fibrosis, TRG5: diffuse residual tumor without regression. TRG1, (TRG2+TRG3), and (TRG4+TRG5) were grouped as complete response, intermediate response, and no response, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 182 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, 112 (61.5%) were male. The mean age was 54.4 (range, 25-87) years. The total number of patients in complete response, intermediate response, and no response group was 24 (13.2%), 105 (57.7%), and 53 (29.1%), respectively. The corresponding five-year relapse-free survival and overall survival rates were 79.8%-92.3%, 74.7%-79.4%, and 55.7%-55.8%, respectively (p < 0.05 for relapse-free survival, p < 0.05 for overall survival). According to ypTNM stage, there was no significant difference in relapse-free survival among TRG groups in ypStage I and II patients (p > 0.05). In ypStage III patients, relapse-free survival was 62 months in no response group vs. not reached in intermediate response group (p < 0.05). According to the ypTNM, there was no significant difference in overall survival among TRG groups in ypStage I, II, and III patients (p > 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, pathological complete response was found to be an independent variable for relapse-free survival and overall survival (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 0.34 (0.17-6.77), 0.39 (0.18-0.83), respectively). CONCLUSION: This study showed that patients with pathological complete response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy had longer relapse-free survival and overall survival rates than those with residual disease.