Thoracoscopic-assisted, minimally invasive versus off-pump bypass grafting for single vessel coronary artery disease - A propensity matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared perioperative outcomes after off-pump revascularization through a thoracoscopic-assisted (non-robotic) minimally invasive approach (Endo-CAB) or sternotomy approach (OPCAB) for patients with single vessel left anterior descending (LAD) disease. METHODS: In this retrospective, propensity matched cohort study, 266 consecutive patients were included in the Endo-CAB group (n = 136) and OPCAB group (n = 130). After propensity score matching 116 Endo-CAB and 116 OPCAB patients were compared. 'Textbook outcome' was defined as the absence of 30-day mortality, re-exploration for bleeding, postoperative ischemia, cardiac tamponade, cerebrovascular events, wound infection, new-onset arrhythmias, pneumonia, placement of chest drains and prolonged hospital stay (> 7 days). Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for textbook outcome. RESULTS: Textbook outcome occurred significantly more frequent in the Endo-CAB group compared to the OPCAB group (81.9% vs. 59.5%, p < 0.001). Patients undergoing Endo-CAB surgery had shorter hospital admission (3.0 [3.0-4.0] vs. 5.0 [4.0-6.0] days, p < 0.001), less blood loss (225 [150-355] vs. 450 [350-600] mL, p < 0.001). Other perioperative outcomes were comparable for both groups. Regression analysis demonstrated that Endo-CAB approach was an independent positive predictor for textbook outcome (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.61-5.66, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that patients undergoing Endo-CAB surgery have improved perioperative outcome resulting in higher rates of textbook outcome for the treatment of single vessel CAD. This technique could be widely available since routine thoracoscopic instruments are used.

Concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation in minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in cardiac surgery effectively restores sinus rhythm and may reduce morbidity and mortality. Cardiac surgery has witnessed the transition from the historical Cox Maze procedure to more modern and less invasive approaches for concomitant AF treatment. As minimally invasive cardiac surgery gains traction, ablation methods and careful patient selection become crucial to optimize results. Emerging techniques, including bipolar epicardial radiofrequency and endo/epicardial cryoablation, are central to these advances, targeting specific arrhythmogenic areas within the atria. While pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is essential, it may be insufficient for patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF. In such cases, left atrial posterior wall isolation has proven beneficial. Furthermore, recent studies emphasize the significance of left atrial appendage occlusion in concurrent AF treatments, highlighting its role in stroke risk reduction. Notably, the left atrium remains the focal point for concomitant AF surgery over the right, primarily due to concerns like high pacemaker implantation rates and complexities of right atrial ablation sets. Although guidelines support its widespread use, concomitant AF ablation outcomes vary based on patient selection, surgeon's expertise, and clinical context and thus the Heart Team's input is crucial for individualized decisions. In the upcoming sections, we present our patient selection and a visual guide to our techniques for concomitant AF surgery in minimally invasive mitral valve, coronary artery bypass and aortic valve surgery.

Thoracoscopic (non-robotic) harvesting of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts.

Minimally invasive coronary surgery offers benefits to the patient. Harvesting the internal mammary artery remains a challenging part of this procedure. We describe our technique for thoracoscopic harvesting of the left and right mammary arteries using routine endoscopic instruments. This is a non-robotic technique that might facilitate a more widespread growth of minimally invasive coronary surgery.

Learning Curve of Thoracoscopic Nonrobotic Harvest of the Left Internal Mammary Artery in Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

OBJECTIVE: Harvest of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) is a technically demanding element of minimally invasive coronary surgery. We aimed to evaluate the learning curve of thoracoscopic, nonrobotic LIMA harvest during endoscopic coronary artery bypass (Endo-CAB) surgery. METHODS: Eighty patients undergoing Endo-CAB surgery were included. LIMA harvest was performed using commonly available video-assisted thoracoscopic instruments. Time from incision until heparin administration was defined as total LIMA harvest time (this includes opening of the pericardium and identification of coronary targets). LIMA harvest times (N = 80) and total procedure times for single-vessel grafting (n = 51) were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean LIMA harvest time was 58 ± 19 min, ranging from 15 to 113 min. The mean procedure time was 150 ± 39 min. Significant reductions in both LIMA harvest and total Endo-CAB procedure times were observed with increasing experience (logarithmic regression Y = 109 - 14.9*log(x), P < 0.001; Y = 227 - 24.4*log(x), P < 0.001, respectively). No damage to the LIMA occurred during thoracoscopic harvesting. CONCLUSIONS: Total thoracoscopic (nonrobotic) LIMA harvest is an efficient technique with a steep learning curve using routine instruments. More patients might benefit from minimally invasive coronary surgery using thoracoscopic LIMA harvest techniques.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy and donor age affecting permanent pacemaker implantation after heart transplantation.

AIMS: The need for permanent pacemakers (PMs) after heart transplantation (HT) is increasing. The aim was to determine the influence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), donor age, and other risk factors on PM implantations early and late after HT and its effect on survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective, single-centre study was performed including HTs from 1984 to July 2018. Early PM was defined as PM implantation ≤90 days and late PM as PM > 90 days. Risk factors for PM and survival after PM were determined with (time-dependent) multivariable Cox regression. Out of 720 HTs performed, 62 were excluded (55 mortalities ≤30 days and 7 retransplantations). Of the remaining 658 patients, 95 (14%) needed a PM: 38 (6%) early and 57 (9%) late during follow-up (median 9.3 years). Early PM risk factors were donor age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.06, P < 0.001], ischaemic time (HR 1.01, P < 0.001), and in adults amiodarone use before HT (HR 2.02, P = 0.045). Late PM risk factors were donor age (HR 1.03, P = 0.024) and CAV (HR 3.59, P < 0.001). Late PM compromised survival (HR 2.05, P < 0.001), while early PM did not (HR 0.77, P = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for early PM implantation were donor age, ischaemic time, and in adults amiodarone use before HT. Late PM implantation risk factors were donor age and CAV. Late PM diminished survival, which is probably a surrogate marker for underlying progressive cardiac disease.

Recovery of conduction disorders after sutureless aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: Conduction disorders and the need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after surgical aortic valve replacement are well-recognized complications. However, in the case of sutureless valve prostheses, it remains unknown whether pacemaker (PM) dependency and conduction disturbances resolve over time. Our aim was to evaluate whether conduction disorders after Perceval sutureless valve implantation recover during follow-up. METHODS: Patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement or concomitant aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass surgery using the Perceval sutureless valve, between January 2010 and July 2018, were included. Postoperative electrocardiogram findings were analysed to determine the incidence of new-onset left bundle branch blocks (LBBBs) and the requirement for PPM implantation. During a postoperative period of 6-18 months, electrocardiogram findings during PM checks were analysed to determine PM dependency and LBBB persistence. RESULTS: Out of 184 patients who received a Perceval prosthesis during the study period, 39 (21.2%) patients developed new-onset LBBB and 10 patients (5.4%) received a PPM postoperatively. The occurrence of conduction disorders was not associated with valve size. Follow-up was completed in 176 (95.7%) patients. In patients with a new-onset LBBB, 35.9% recovered during follow-up (P = 0.001). Seven out of 10 (70%) patients remained PM dependent. CONCLUSIONS: After Perceval aortic valve implantation, new-onset LBBB recovers in more than one-third of patients during follow-up. In patients who needed a postoperative PPM, the majority remained PM dependent.

Extensive scar modification for the treatment of intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia in patients after congenital heart surgery.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is an important therapeutic option for atrial tachycardias in patients with CHD. As a result of extensive scarring and surgical repair, multiple intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia circuits develop and serve as a substrate for arrhythmias. The best ablation approach for patients with multiple intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardias has not been investigated. Here, we compared substrate-based ablation using extensive scar modification to conventional ablation. METHODS: The present study included patients with surgically corrected CHD that underwent intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia ablation. Extensive scar modification was defined as substrate ablation based on a dense voltage map, aimed to eliminate all potentials in the scar region. The control group had activation mapping-based ablation. A clinical composite endpoint was assessed. Points were given for type, number, and treatment of intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia recurrence. RESULTS: In 40 patients, 63 (extensive scar modification 13) procedures were performed. Acute procedural success was achieved in 78%. Procedural duration was similar in both groups. Forty-nine percent had a recurrence within 1 year. During a 5-year follow-up (2.5-7.5 years), 46% required repeat catheter ablation. Compared to baseline, clinical composite endpoint significantly decreased by 46% after 12 months (p = 0.001). Acute procedural success, procedural parameters, recurrence and repeat ablation were similar between extensive scar modification and activation mapping-based ablation. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation using extensive scar modification for intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardias occurring after surgically corrected CHD illustrated similar short- and long-term outcomes and procedural efficiency compared to catheter ablation using activation mapping-based ablation. The choice of ablation approach for multiple intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia should remain at the discretion of the operator.

Evolution of perioperative blood transfusion practice after coronary artery bypass grafting in the past two decades.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Transfusion of blood products after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the perioperative use of blood products in patients undergoing CABG in our institution over the past two decades. METHODS: The study included 18 992 patients who underwent isolated CABG at our hospital between 1998 and 2017. Baseline characteristics of patients and the number of perioperative transfusions during their hospital stay (including red blood cells [RBCs], platelets, and fresh frozen plasma [FFP]) were assessed. Logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for perioperative transfusion. RESULTS: The rates of perioperative RBC transfusion decreased for all patients undergoing isolated CABG (52.1% in 1998 vs 18.6% in 2017) in our institution. The mean number of transfused RBC units was significantly higher in women than in men (1.57 ± 2.2 vs 0.68 ± 1.84; P < .005); this difference remained significant over the years. After adjusting the results for other risk factors, female sex was a significant independent risk factor for perioperative RBC transfusion. The platelet transfusion rate increased over the past two decades (1.4% in 1998 vs 9.7% in 2017). The number of FFP transfusions remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past two decades, we observed a decrease in the incidence of perioperative RBC transfusions in patients undergoing isolated CABG, whereas platelet transfusions increased. Female sex was an independent predictor of perioperative RBC transfusion.

Predictive value of great saphenous vein mapping prior to endoscopic harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The use of endoscopic vein harvesting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting is increasing, often using bedside mapping. However, data on the predictive value of great saphenous vein (GSV) mapping are scarce. This study assessed whether preoperative mapping could predict final conduit diameter. METHODS: A prospective registry was created that included 251 patients. Saphenous vein mapping was performed prior to endoscopic vein harvesting at 3 predetermined sites. After harvesting and preparing the GSV, the outer diameters were measured. Appropriate graft size was defined as an outer diameter between 3 and 6 mm. RESULTS: A total of 753 GSV segments were analysed. The average mapping diameter was 3.2 ± 0.7 mm. The harvested GSV had a mean diameter of 4.7 ± 0.8 mm. Mapping diameters were significantly positively correlated with actual GSV diameters (correlation coefficient, 0.47; P < 0.001). If the preoperative mapping diameters were between 1.5 and 5 mm, 96.6% of the GSVs had suitable dimensions after endoscopic vein harvesting. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative bedside mapping moderately predicts final GSV size after endoscopic harvesting but could not detect unsuitable vein segments. However, the majority of endoscopically harvested GSVs had diameters suitable to be used as coronary bypass grafts.

Robotic navigation shows superior improvement in efficiency for atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUND: Because of the expanding atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, AF catheter ablation (CA) techniques have to become more efficient. Efficient AF CA procedures are characterized by successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) within reasonable procedure time. Currently there are many PVI techniques available and all show substantial improvements over time. However, the magnitude of improvement in procedural efficiency has not yet been compared between different techniques. The aim of this study was to compare efficiency improvement between manually (MAN) guided, cryoballoon (CB) and remote magnetic navigation (RMN) guided PVI. METHODS: A total of 221 patients were included in this retrospective study. Procedural parameters of 115 patients treated with first-generation PVI techniques (MAN-1, CB-1, RMN-1) performed in 2010, were compared to 106 patients who were treated with the latest, second generation techniques (MAN-2, CB-2, RMN-2). Efficiency was characterized by the following parameters: total ablation time, total procedure time, first pass isolation (FPI) (i.e. successful isolation after the first pulmonary vein (PV) encirclement) and touch-up rates. RESULTS: Every technique showed significant improvement of procedure times from the first to the second generation (P<0.001). In-between second generation techniques, the procedure times were comparable. The greatest magnitude of procedure time improvement was observed within the RMN groups (∆-180min), which was significantly greater compared to CB (∆-48 min, P<0.001) and MAN (∆-98min, P=0.011) groups. The highest FPI rates were observed in RMN-2 (78% and 74%; left and right PVs respectively), which was significantly higher compared to other techniques (MAN-2: 24% and 24%; CB-2: 50% and 48%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The highest magnitude of efficiency improvement was detected in RMN guided PVI.

Conduction disorders and impact on survival after sutureless aortic valve replacement compared to conventional stented bioprostheses.

OBJECTIVES: Sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve prostheses are frequently used for the treatment of aortic stenosis. However, postoperative left bundle branch block (LBBB) and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation have emerged as frequent complications. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of new-onset LBBB and PPM implantation after sutureless aortic valve replacement (sAVR) with stented bioprostheses, and the impact on postoperative survival. METHODS: Patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) or concomitant AVR with coronary artery bypass surgery between January 2010 and July 2017 were included in the study. Two groups were defined: sAVR and conventional AVR (cAVR). The findings of preoperative electrocardiograms were compared with postoperative electrocardiogram findings for both groups. The incidence of new-onset LBBB and the requirement for PPM implantation were recorded. The effect of these conduction disorders on late survival was analysed. RESULTS: A total of 987 patients were analysed, consisting of 132 sAVR and 855 cAVR patients. The sAVR group had an increased incidence of new-onset LBBB compared to the cAVR group (16.7% vs 2.3%, P < 0.001). A significantly higher rate of postoperative PPM implantation was found for sAVR patients compared to cAVR (6.8% vs 1.6%, P = 0.001). The multivariate Cox analysis revealed that neither postoperative new-onset LBBB nor PPM implantation was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 0.74-4.03, P = 0.204). CONCLUSIONS: sAVR is associated with an increased risk of new-onset LBBB and PPM requirement compared to cAVR. In this population, postoperative conduction disorders did not affect the mid-term survival.

Epicardial Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion Reduces Blood Pressure in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) has evolved as an alternative strategy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Recent observational data have suggested that epicardial LAAE can have substantial impact on arrhythmia burden and hemodynamic profile. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to study the impact of epicardial versus endocardial LAAE on systemic blood pressure in hypertensive AF patients. METHODS: This was a prospective, nonrandomized study comparing 247 patients who underwent epicardial LAAE with 124 patients with endocardial exclusion. Clinical outcomes were measured at 3 months and 1 year. Primary outcome was improvement in systolic blood pressure (SBP) between both groups compared with baseline. Secondary outcome included changes in diastolic pressures (DBP), serum electrolytes, and creatinine. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline SBP between epicardial and endocardial groups. SBP was significantly lower in the epicardial group both at 3 months (122 ± 11.8 mm Hg vs. 129.7 ± 8.2 mm Hg; p < 0.001) and 1 year (123 ± 11.6 mm Hg vs. 132.2 ± 8.8 mm Hg; p < 0.001) compared with the endocardial group. An adjusted multivariate linear mixed effects model demonstrated that epicardial LAAE significantly decreased SBP by 7.4 mm Hg at 3 months and by 8.9 mm Hg at 1 year (p < 0.0001). There was a trend toward lower DBP with epicardial LAAE at 3 months by 1.3 mm Hg (p = 0.2) and at 1 year by 1.8 mm Hg (p = 0.09). There was no significant difference in serum electrolytes and creatinine between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In hypertensive AF patients, epicardial LAAE significantly decreases SBP both at 3 and 12 months compared with endocardial exclusion.

Clinical research: remote magnetic navigation vs. manually controlled catheter ablation of right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias: a retrospective study.

Aims: Remote magnetic navigation (RMN) is an alternative to manual catheter control (MCC) radiofrequency ablation of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) arrhythmias. The data to support RMN approach is limited. We aimed to investigate the clinical and procedural outcomes in a cohort of patients undergoing RVOT premature ventricular complex/ventricular tachycardia (PVCs/VT) ablation procedures using RMN vs. MCC. Methods and results: Data was collected from two centres. Eighty-nine consecutive RVOT PVCs/VT ablation procedures were performed in 75 patients; RMN: 42 procedures and MCC: 47 procedures. CARTOXPTM or CARTO3 (Biosense Webster) was used for endocardial mapping in 19/42 (45%) in RMN group and 28/47 (60%) in MCC group; EnSiteTM NavXTM (St. Jude Medical) was used in the rest of the cohort. Stereotaxis platform (Stereotaxis Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) was used for RMN approach. Procedural time was 113 ± 53 min in the RMN group and 115 ± 69 min in MCC (P = 0.90). Total fluoroscopic time was 10.9 ± 5.8 vs. 20.5 ± 13.8 (P < 0.05) and total ablation energy application time 7.0 ± 4.7 vs 11.9 ± 16 (P = 0.67) accordingly. There were two complications in RMN group and five in MCC (P = 0.43). Acute procedural success rate was 80% in RMN vs. 74% in MCC group (P = 0.46). After a median follow-up of 25 months (interquartile range 13-34), the success rate remained 55% in the RMN group and 53% in MCC (P = 0.96). Conclusion: Right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmia ablations were performed using half of fluoroscopic times with Stereotaxis platform RMN compared to manual approach. Acute and chronic success rates as well as complication rates were not significantly different.

Significantly Elevated C-Reactive Protein Levels After Epicardial Clipping of the Left Atrial Appendage.

OBJECTIVE: Besides mechanical and anatomical changes of the left atrium, epicardial closure of the left atrial appendage has also possible homeostatic effects. The aim of this study was to assess whether epicardial clipping of the left atrial appendage has different biochemical effects compared with complete removal of the left atrial appendage. METHODS: Eighty-two patients were included and underwent a totally thoracoscopic AF ablation procedure. As part of the procedure, the left atrial appendage was excluded with an epicardial clip (n = 57) or the left atrial appendage was fully amputated with an endoscopic vascular stapler (n = 25). From all patients' preprocedural and postprocedural blood pressure, electrolytes and inflammatory parameters were collected. RESULTS: The mean age and left atrial volume index were comparable between the epicardial clip and stapler group (64 ± 8 years vs. 60 ± 9 years, P = non-significant; 44 ± 15 mL/m vs. 40 ± 13 mL/m, P = non-significant). Patients receiving left atrial appendage clipping had significantly elevated C-reactive protein levels compared with patients who had left atrial appendage stapling at the second, third, and fourth postoperative day (225 ± 84 mg/L vs. 149 ± 76 mg/L, P = 0.002, 244 ± 78 vs. 167 ± 76, P = 0.004, 190 ± 74 vs. 105 ± 48, P < 0.001, respectively). Patients had a significant decrease in sodium levels, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure at 24 and 72 hours after left atrial appendage closure. However, this was comparable for both the left atrial appendage clipping and stapling group. CONCLUSIONS: Increased activation of the inflammatory response was observed after left atrial appendage clipping compared with left atrial appendage stapling. Furthermore, a significant decrease in blood pressure was observed after surgical removal of the left atrial appendage. Whether the inflammatory response affects the outcome of arrhythmia surgery needs to be further evaluated.

Mycotic innominate artery aneurysm repair using a bovine pericardial bifurcation prosthesis.

We report the use of a bovine pericardial bifurcation prosthesis to repair a mycotic innominate artery aneurysm.

Sutureless aortic valve replacement in a calcified homograft combined with mitral valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement in a patient with an aortic homograft can be very challenging, especially when concomitant mitral valve surgery needs to be performed. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of implantation of a sutureless aortic valve bioprosthesis combined with mitral valve replacement in a patient with a severely calcified aortic homograft where conventional valve replacement was technically unfeasible. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that sutureless AVR is a viable option especially for young patients with a high surgical risk where conventional valve replacement cannot be achieved.