Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Hum Resour Health ; 19(1): 75, 2021 06 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34147114

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Quality of training is determined through programs' compliance with accreditation standards, often set for a number of years. However, perspectives on quality of training within these standards may differ from the clinicians' perspectives on quality of training. Knowledge on how standards relate to clinicians' perspectives on quality of training is currently lacking yet is expected to lead to improved accreditation design. METHODS: This qualitative study design was based on a case-study research approach. We analyzed accreditation standards and conducted 29 interviews with accreditors, clinical supervisors and trainees across Australia and the Netherlands about the quality and accreditation of specialist medical training programs. The perspectives were coded and either if applicable compared to national accreditation standards of both jurisdictions, or thematized to the way stakeholders encounter accreditation standards in practice. RESULTS: There were two evident matches and four mismatches between the perspectives of clinicians and the accreditation standards. The matches are: (1) accreditation is necessary (2) trainees are the best source for quality measures. The mismatches are: (3) fundamental training aspects that accreditation standards do not capture: the balance between training and service provision, and trainee empowerment (4) using standards lack dynamism and (5) quality improvement; driven by standards or intrinsic motivation of healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION: In our Australian and Dutch health education cases accreditation is an accepted phenomenon which may be improved by trainee empowerment, a dynamic updating process of standards and by flexibility in its use.


Assuntos
Acreditação , Melhoria de Qualidade , Austrália , Humanos , Países Baixos , Especialização
2.
BMC Med Educ ; 20(Suppl 1): 306, 2020 Sep 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32981517

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Accreditation is a key feature of many medical education systems, helping to ensure that programs teach and assess learners according to applicable standards, provide optimal learning environments, and produce professionals who are competent to practise in challenging and evolving health care systems. Although most medical education accreditation systems apply similar standards domains and process elements, there can be substantial variation among accreditation systems at the level of design and implementation. A discussion group at the 2013 World Summit on Outcomes-Based Accreditation examined best practices in health professional education accreditation systems and identified that the literature examining the effectiveness of different approaches to accreditation is scant. Although some frameworks for accreditation design do exist, they are often specific to one phase of the medical education continuum. MAIN TEXT: This paper attempts to define a framework for the operational design of medical education accreditation that articulates design options as well as their contextual and practical implications. It assumes there is no single set of best practices in accreditation system development but, rather, an underlying set of design decisions. A "fit for purpose" approach aims to ensure that a system, policy, or program is designed and operationalized in a manner best suited to local needs and contexts. This approach is aligned with emerging models for education and international development that espouse decentralization. CONCLUSION: The framework highlights that, rather than a single best practice, variation among accreditation systems is appropriate provided that is it tailored to the needs of local contexts. Our framework is intended to provide guidance to administrators, policy-makers, and educators regarding different approaches to medical education accreditation and their applicability and appropriateness in local contexts.


Assuntos
Acreditação , Educação Médica , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Aprendizagem
3.
BMC Med Educ ; 20(Suppl 1): 308, 2020 Sep 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32981518

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Accreditation systems are based on a number of principles and purposes that vary across jurisdictions. Decision making about accreditation governance suffers from a paucity of evidence. This paper evaluates the pros and cons of continuous quality improvement (CQI) within educational institutions that have traditionally been accredited based on episodic evaluation by external reviewers. METHODS: A naturalistic utility-focused evaluation was performed. Seven criteria, each relevant to government oversight, were used to evaluate the pros and cons of the use of CQI in three medical school accreditation systems across the continuum of medical education. The authors, all involved in the governance of accreditation, iteratively discussed CQI in their medical education contexts in light of the seven criteria until consensus was reached about general patterns. RESULTS: Because institutional CQI makes use of early warning systems, it may enhance the reflective function of accreditation. In the three medical accreditation systems examined, external accreditors lacked the ability to respond quickly to local events or societal developments. There is a potential role for CQI in safeguarding the public interest. Moreover, the central governance structure of accreditation may benefit from decentralized CQI. However, CQI has weaknesses with respect to impartiality, independence, and public accountability, as well as with the ability to balance expectations with capacity. CONCLUSION: CQI, as evaluated with the seven criteria of oversight, has pros and cons. Its use still depends on the balance between the expected positive effects-especially increased reflection and faster response to important issues-versus the potential impediments. A toxic culture that affects impartiality and independence, as well as the need to invest in bureaucratic systems may make in impractical for some institutions to undertake CQI.


Assuntos
Educação Médica , Melhoria de Qualidade , Acreditação , Humanos , Faculdades de Medicina , Responsabilidade Social
4.
BMJ Open Qual ; 9(1)2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32075804

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: A toxic organisational culture (OC) is a major contributing factor to serious failings in healthcare delivery. Poor OC with its consequences of unprofessional behaviour, unsafe attitudes of professionals and its impact on patient care still need to be addressed. Although various tools have been developed to determine OC and improve patient safety, it remains a challenge to decide on the suitability of tools for uncovering the underlying factors which truly impact OC, such as behavioural norms, or the unwritten rules. A better understanding of the underlying dimensions that these tools do and do not unravel is required. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to provide an overview of existing tools to assess OC and the tangible and intangible OC dimensions these tools address. METHODS: An interpretive umbrella review was conducted. Literature reviews were considered for inclusion if they described multiple tools and their dimensional characteristics in the context of OC, organisational climate, patient safety culture or climate. OC tools and the underlying dimensions were extracted from the reviews. A qualitative data analysis software program (MAX.QDA 2007) was used for coding the dimensions, which resulted in tangible and intangible themes. RESULTS: Fifteen reviews met our inclusion criteria. A total of 127 tools were identified, which were mainly quantitative questionnaires covering tangible key dimensions. Qualitative analyses distinguished nine intangible themes (commitment, trust, psychological safety, power, support, communication openness, blame and shame, morals and valuing ethics, and cohesion) and seven tangible themes (leadership, communication system, teamwork, training and development, organisational structures and processes, employee and job attributes, and patient orientation). CONCLUSION: This umbrella review identifies the essential tangible and intangible themes of OC tools. OC tools in healthcare do not seem to be designed to determine deeper underlying dimensions of culture. We suggest approaching complex underlying OC problems by focusing on the intangible dimensions, rather than putting the tangible dimensions up front.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/normas , Cultura Organizacional , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Países Baixos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários
7.
BMC Med Educ ; 17(1): 98, 2017 Jun 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28577536

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Evaluating the quality of postgraduate medical education (PGME) programs through accreditation is common practice worldwide. Accreditation is shaped by educational quality and quality management. An appropriate accreditation design is important, as it may drive improvements in training. Moreover, accreditors determine whether a PGME program passes the assessment, which may have major consequences, such as starting, continuing or discontinuing PGME. However, there is limited evidence for the benefits of different choices in accreditation design. Therefore, this study aims to explain how changing views on educational quality and quality management have impacted the design of the PGME accreditation system in the Netherlands. METHODS: To determine the historical development of the Dutch PGME accreditation system, we conducted a document analysis of accreditation documents spanning the past 50 years and a vision document outlining the future system. A template analysis technique was used to identify the main elements of the system. RESULTS: Four themes in the Dutch PGME accreditation system were identified: (1) objectives of accreditation, (2) PGME quality domains, (3) quality management approaches and (4) actors' responsibilities. Major shifts have taken place regarding decentralization, residency performance and physician practice outcomes, and quality improvement. Decentralization of the responsibilities of the accreditor was absent in 1966, but this has been slowly changing since 1999. In the future system, there will be nearly a maximum degree of decentralization. A focus on outcomes and quality improvement has been introduced in the current system. The number of formal documents striving for quality assurance has increased enormously over the past 50 years, which has led to increased bureaucracy. The future system needs to decrease the number of standards to focus on measurable outcomes and to strive for quality improvement. CONCLUSION: The challenge for accreditors is to find the right balance between trusting and controlling medical professionals. Their choices will be reflected in the accreditation design. The four themes could enhance international comparisons and encourage better choices in the design of accreditation systems.


Assuntos
Acreditação , Educação Médica Continuada/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Acreditação/legislação & jurisprudência , Acreditação/normas , Documentação , Humanos , Países Baixos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde
8.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 157(22): A6026, 2013.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23714294

RESUMO

A 78-year-old woman presented at the emergency room with abdominal pain and diarrhea. At physical examination an abdominal tumour was palpated. The CT-scan showed an invagination of the colon, whereupon an explorative laparatomy was performed. A right-hemicolectomy was conducted and pathology showed an invasive mucineus cystadenocarcinoma in the caecum.


Assuntos
Dor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Ceco/diagnóstico , Cistadenocarcinoma Mucinoso/diagnóstico , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Dor Abdominal/cirurgia , Idoso , Neoplasias do Ceco/complicações , Neoplasias do Ceco/cirurgia , Colectomia , Cistadenocarcinoma Mucinoso/complicações , Cistadenocarcinoma Mucinoso/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...