Optimising the use of physiotherapy resources after manipulation under anaesthetic for frozen shoulder.

INTRODUCTION: Manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) is a successful treatment for frozen shoulder (FS), and the recovery period and recurrence rates may be reduced by postoperative physiotherapy. This study evaluates two physiotherapy pathways for patients undergoing MUA for FS. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2018, 248 age- and sex-matched patients presented to either a NHS secondary care upper limb service or the lead author's independent practice with a diagnosis of FS. The patients had differential access to postprocedure physiotherapy based on which service they presented to. In Group 1, physiotherapy advice only was given to the patient. In Group 2, supervised hydrotherapy and physiotherapy occurred postoperatively. Pre- and postprocedure Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS) were collected for each group. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to measure the effect of physiotherapy on postoperative OSS. RESULTS: Group 2 showed a significantly greater improvement in postprocedure OSS when compared with Group 1 (18.2 vs 16.7) p<0.001). The estimated maximum effect of physiotherapy on postoperative OSS was an increase of 3.2. CONCLUSION: Following MUA for FS, a statistically significant increase in OSS was detected in patients receiving postprocedure physiotherapy compared with advice alone. There was no difference in recurrence rates. The increase in OSS (3.2) is below the minimal clinically important difference, raising questions regarding the relative importance of postprocedure physiotherapy in a resource-limited environment.

Impact of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic on the workload of the orthopaedic service in a busy UK district general hospital.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID -19 outbreak has had a profound effect on the management of healthcare service provision in the UK. Orthopaedic departments have been no exception to this and have needed to adapt to the changing circumstances by releasing resources and focusing on 'essential' activity. The aim of this study is to quantify the reduction in trauma and, in addition, describe any changes in the type of referrals to the trust which may have been affected by the pandemic itself and the social distancing measures employed by the UK government. METHODS: The study was performed in a UK District Hospital which is also a Trauma Unit providing trauma and orthopaedic care to a population of 625,000 people. The trust based electronic database of trauma referrals was used to compare the numbers of, and types of referral to our trauma service during the COVID-19 pandemic and the corresponding time periods in the previous 3 years. RESULTS: The mean number of referrals per week to the service reduced by 33% in the time period following the confirmation of the outbreak as a pandemic (p<0.0001). Number of operations performed per week reduced by 26% (p = 0.001). There was no change in the number of referrals relating to domestic abuse or non-accidental injury. In addition, numbers of hip fractures, periprosthetic fractures and prosthetic joint dislocations were unchanged. There was a significant reduction in the number of referrals for simple fractures, native joint dislocations, wounds and soft tissue injuries. Within the paediatric population, similarly, a reduction in simple fracture referrals was demonstrated. DISCUSSION: An association between the outbreak of the pandemic and a reduction in referral numbers to our department has been demonstrated. The direct cause of this may be multifactorial but proposing that it is, in part, due to the social distancing measures introduced by the government is certainly conceivable. The patterns of injury would reflect this also with low energy and fragility trauma persisting whilst injuries associated with younger people have reduced. We would suggest that information such as this could be useful in healthcare planning and resource allocation in future pandemic situations.