A User-Friendly Sample Preparation Alternative for Manual and Automated LC-MS/MS Quantification of Testosterone.

We describe an LC-MS/MS method for serum testosterone using a novel extraction media, AC Extraction Plate™ (AC Plate,Tecan Schweiz). The AC Plate principle is essentially that of a liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) but employs a stationary nonpolar phase coated on the wells of 96-well plates instead of a nonmiscible organic solvent for partitioning testosterone out of serum, leaving interfering substances behind. This low complexity sample preparation protocol has been validated for and used in production in our laboratory with both manual and automated liquid handling. The primary advantage of this method is the highly reproducible nature of an extraction method that does not require LC-MS/MS expertise or specialized extraction equipment. We modified the existing vendor application and validated the method for matrix effect, recovery, precision, trueness [accuracy relative to certified reference material (CRM)], specificity, reportable range, sample stability, various sample containers, and correlation with other methods.Method performance is excellent, with a reportable range of 4-750 ng/dL, between-day quality control coefficient of variation (CV) over 12 months of <8%, mean accuracy of <4.0% bias against CRM, no interference from hemolysis, icterus, lipemia, serum separator tube gel, or common steroids/metabolites, and mean bias of 1.3% versus 4 other LC-MS/MS testosterone methods. An investigation of calibration stability and robustness supports sparse (3 versus 6 calibrators) and/or historical calibration for routine use.

Multicenter Evaluation of Clinical Diagnostic Methods for Detection and Isolation of Campylobacter spp. from Stool.

The use of culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs), such as stool antigen tests, as standalone tests for the detection of Campylobacter in stool is increasing. We conducted a prospective, multicenter study to evaluate the performance of stool antigen CIDTs compared to culture and PCR for Campylobacter detection. Between July and October 2010, we tested 2,767 stool specimens from patients with gastrointestinal illness with the following methods: four types of Campylobacter selective media, four commercial stool antigen assays, and a commercial PCR assay. Illnesses from which specimens were positive by one or more culture media or at least one CIDT and PCR were designated "cases." A total of 95 specimens (3.4%) met the case definition. The stool antigen CIDTs ranged from 79.6% to 87.6% in sensitivity, 95.9 to 99.5% in specificity, and 41.3 to 84.3% in positive predictive value. Culture alone detected 80/89 (89.9% sensitivity) Campylobacter jejuni/Campylobacter coli-positive cases. Of the 209 noncases that were positive by at least one CIDT, only one (0.48%) was positive by all four stool antigen tests, and 73% were positive by just one stool antigen test. The questionable relevance of unconfirmed positive stool antigen CIDT results was supported by the finding that noncases were less likely than cases to have gastrointestinal symptoms. Thus, while the tests were convenient to use, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of Campylobacter stool antigen tests were highly variable. Given the relatively low incidence of Campylobacter disease and the generally poor diagnostic test characteristics, this study calls into question the use of commercially available stool antigen CIDTs as standalone tests for direct detection of Campylobacter in stool.