Admission High-Sensitive Cardiac Troponin T Level Increase Is Independently Associated with Higher Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, increases in high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) have been reported to be associated with worse outcomes. In the critically ill, the prognostic value of hs-cTnT, however, remains to be assessed given that most previous studies have involved a case mix of non- and severely ill COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We conducted, from March to May 2020, in three French intensive care units (ICUs), a multicenter retrospective cohort study to assess in-hospital mortality predictability of hs-cTnT levels in COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: 111 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients (68% of male, median age 67 (58-75) years old) were included. At ICU admission, the median Charlson Index, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and PaO2/FiO2 were at 3 (2-5), 37 (27-48), and 140 (98-154), respectively, and the median hs-cTnT serum levels were at 16.0 (10.1-31.9) ng/L. Seventy-five patients (68%) were mechanically ventilated, 41 (37%) were treated with norepinephrine, and 17 (15%) underwent renal replacement therapy. In-hospital mortality was 29% (32/111) and was independently associated with lower PaO2/FiO2 and higher hs-cTnT serum levels. CONCLUSIONS: At ICU admission, besides PaO2/FiO2, hs-cTnT levels may allow early risk stratification and triage in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Mechanical Recanalization after Transfer from a Distant Primary Stroke Center: Effectiveness and Future Directions.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the effectiveness of endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) admitted to a primary stroke center (PSC). The aim of this study was to assess EVT effectiveness after transfer from a PSC to a distant (156 km apart; 1.5 hour by car) comprehensive stroke center (CSC), and to discuss perspectives to improve access to EVT, if indicated. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Analysis of the data collected in a 6-year prospective registry of patients admitted to a PSC for AIS due to LVO and selected for transfer to a distant CSC for EVT. The rate of transfer, futile transfer, EVT, reperfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score ≥2b-3), and relevant time measures were determined. RESULTS: Among the 529 patients eligible, 278 (52.6%) were transferred and 153 received EVT (55% of transferred patients) followed by reperfusion in 115 (overall reperfusion rate: 21.7%). Median times (interquartile range) were: 90 minutes (76-110) for PSC-door-in to PSC-door-out, 88 minutes (65-104) for PSC-door-out to CSC-door-in, 262 minutes (239-316) for PSC-imaging to reperfusion, and 393 minutes (332-454) for symptom onset to reperfusion. At 3 months, rates of favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) were not significantly different between patients eligible for EVT (42.4%), transferred patients (49.1%) and patients who underwent EVT (34.1%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that transfer to a distant CSC is associated with reduced access to early EVT. These results argue in favor of on-site EVT at high volume PSCs that are distant from the CSC.

[Impact of mobile intensive care units on treating stroke within the 3-hour time window in a semi-rural area]. / Intérêt d'une médicalisation préhospitalière des accidents vasculaires cérébraux de moins de 3 heures en milieu semi-rural.

OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that calling emergency medical services ("15", French equivalent of 911 or 999 calls) and response by a mobile intensive care unit staffed by emergency physicians (MICU) reduces the time to treatment to within the 3-hour time window required for administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. METHODS: This study compared the time from symptom onset to admission (prehospital time), from admission to treatment (imaging and treatment delays, hospital time), and total time from symptom onset to treatment in an observational cohort of 53 consecutive patients, according to how they reached the hospital (Group 1: MICU and group 2: standard emergency ambulance dispatched by EMS center [2a] or direct admission [2b]). RESULTS: The study included 52 patients (1 was excluded because hospitalized at the time of the stroke): 27 (51.9%) in group 1, 16 (30.8%) in group 2a, and 9 (17.3%) in group 2b. Calling "15" shortened total home-to-needle time by 24 minutes (p=0.034). The mean total time was not significantly shorter in group 1 (152 versus 162 min; p=0.27) but MICUs were used for patients farther away (mean distance 25 versus 11 km; p=0.02). The average prehospital time was thus higher in group 1 (86 versus 69 min; p=0.044), but was compensated by a reduction in the average hospital time (66 versus 93 min; p=0.0001), due mainly to shorter waits for imaging (22 versus 45 min; p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Calling the emergency services number reduces mean total time. MICUs were associated with a longer prehospital time, mainly due to greater distances, but they facilitated in-hospital management.