The value of delta neutrophil index in neonatal sepsis diagnosis, follow-up and mortality prediction.

BACKGROUND: The complete blood cell count (CBC) and peripheral blood smear were the most commonly ordered tests for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Delta neutrophil index (DNI) shows leucocyte differentiation and calculated while CBC is performed. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the value of DNI in neonatal sepsis. STUDY DESIGN: DNI was measured with Siemens Advia 2120 and 2120i devices. DNI was calculated as (neutrophil and eosinophil count in myeloperoxidase channel)-(polymorphonuclear leucocyte count in nuclear lobularity channel). RESULTS: Study population included 141 and 87 neonates in sepsis (110 proven, 31 clinical) and control groups. Demographic characters were similar between groups. Proven sepsis group had lower birthweight and higher late-onset sepsis rate than clinical sepsis and control groups. Median DNI (16.3 vs 1,4) and CRP (6.8 vs 0,03 mg/dl) were significantly higher in sepsis group. Proven sepsis group had significantly higher DNI level than clinical sepsis group (20.8 vs 9.1). Cut-off level of DNI was 4.6 with 85% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Cut-off level of CRP was 0.58 mg/dl with 81% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Combination of DNI and CRP gave 98% sensitivity and 76% specificity. Mortality rate in sepsis group was 39%. Median DNI level in patients with mortality was significantly higher (30.1 vs 9.6). Cut-off level of DNI for mortality prediction was 16.1 with 75% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Follow-up levels of DNI was significantly decreased in 6-10 days to normal levels (16.3 to 4.2). CONCLUSIONS: DNI was found to be useful in the diagnose, follow-up and mortality prediction of neonatal sepsis without extra blood to CBC.

Does screening for vaginal infection have an impact on pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles?

OBJECTIVE: Assisted reproduction techniques have become widespread worldwide. Considering their costs, physicians endeavor to improve pregnancy rates. Infections are one of the disrupting problems in this arena. We aimed to investigate the effects of screening for vaginal infection on pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty patients randomized into two groups for this study. Patients were screened for vaginal infections in group 1, and no screening was performed in group 2. The assisted reproduction outcomes were investigated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between ages, or durations and causes of infertility of patients who conceived and of those who did conceive. Forty-five patients in group 1, and 40 patients in group 2 reached the embryo transfer stage. The rates of conception were 23.5% (n=4) in culture-positive patients (n=17), and 42.9% (n=12) in culture-negative patients (n=28) in group 1. There was no significant difference among patients who were not screened, screen-positive, and screen-negative, in terms of pregnancy rates. None of the patients had Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Trichomonas vaginalis. Bacterial vaginosis was detected in 13 patients, and both bacterial vaginosis and Chlamydia trachomatis were detected in 4 patients. Three of 4 patients who conceived screen-positive and 8 of 12 patients who conceived screen-negative delivered healthily at term. CONCLUSION: No significant difference was found between patients who were sampled for culture and patients who were not sampled in terms of pregnancy rates. Also, no difference was found between the patients who were culture-negative and patients who were treated with antimicrobials after a culture positive result. Further larger studies are warranted to clarify this issue.