Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Crit Care Med ; 51(11): 1515-1526, 2023 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37310174

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: For COVID-19-related respiratory failure, noninvasive respiratory assistance via a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), helmet, and face-mask noninvasive ventilation is used. However, which of these options is most effective is yet to be determined. This study aimed to compare the three techniques of noninvasive respiratory support and to determine the superior technique. DESIGN: A randomized control trial with permuted block randomization of nine cases per block for each parallel, open-labeled arm. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Adult patients with COVID-19 with a Pa o2 /F io2 ratio of less than 300, admitted between February 4, 2021, and August 9, 2021, to three tertiary centers in Oman, were studied. INTERVENTIONS: This study included three interventions: HFNC ( n = 47), helmet continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP; n = 52), and face-mask CPAP ( n = 52). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The endotracheal intubation rate and mortality at 28 and 90 days were measured as the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Of the 159 randomized patients, 151 were analyzed. The median age was 52 years, and 74% were men. The endotracheal intubation rates were 44%, 45%, and 46% ( p = 0.99), and the median intubation times were 7.0, 5.5, and 4.5 days ( p = 0.11) in the HFNC, face-mask CPAP, and helmet CPAP, respectively. In comparison to face-mask CPAP, the relative risk of intubation was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.63-1.49) for HFNC and 1.0 (95% CI 0.66-1.51) for helmet CPAP. The mortality rates were 23%, 32%, and 38% at 28 days ( p = 0.24) and 43%, 38%, and 40% ( p = 0.89) at 90 days for HFNC, face-mask CPAP, and helmet CPAP, respectively. The trial was stopped prematurely because of a decline in cases. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory trial found no difference in intubation rate and mortality among the three intervention groups for the COVID-19 patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure; however, more evidence is needed to confirm these findings as the trial was aborted prematurely.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Insuficiência Respiratória , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Respiração Artificial , Cânula , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/terapia , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Insuficiência Respiratória/complicações , Intubação Intratraqueal
3.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J ; 22(3): 339-342, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36072062

RESUMO

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of elevated peripheral blood eosinophil (PBE) counts in hospitalised patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) in Oman. An elevated PBE count during AECOPD is a potential predictor of treatment responsiveness and future exacerbation risk. Methods: This single-centre retrospective study included all patients with AECOPD who were admitted to Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman, between January 2017 and July 2019. The patients were classified as having eosinophilic or non-eosinophilic AECOPD based on blood eosinophil counts. An elevated eosinophil count was defined as a blood eosinophil count >0.3 × 109 cells/L on admission. The length of hospital stay, use of oral and inhaled steroids, number of readmissions in a year and use of mechanical ventilation on admission were compared between the eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic AECOPD groups. Results: Of the 102 patients included in the study, 42.2% had eosinophilic AECOPD. The eosinophilic AECOPD group had a reduced length of hospital stay (P = 0.02) but an increased risk of readmission in a year (P = 0.04). Most patients in both groups were treated with inhaled and oral steroids. The need for mechanical ventilation did not differ between the groups. Conclusion: Eosinophilia is highly prevalent in patients with AECOPD and is associated with a reduced length of hospital stay but an increased risk of readmission in a year. It can be used as a surrogate marker to predict the health outcomes of patients with AECOPD and select treatment options.


Assuntos
Eosinófilos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Prevalência , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Case Rep Nephrol ; 2015: 589537, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25664192

RESUMO

Pulmonary mucormycosis is an uncommon, but important, opportunistic fungal pneumonia which is often diagnosed late. Renal failure as the predominant presenting feature is not common in mucormycosis. Moreover, sudden, massive hemoptysis is not a usual complication. In this report we describe fatal pulmonary mucormycosis in a young patient with a previously undiagnosed chronic renal failure.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...