RESUMO
RESEARCH QUESTION: Does double blastocyst vitrification and warming affect pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rates, or birth outcomes, from embryos that have undergone preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) testing? DESIGN: This retrospective observational analysis of embryo transfers was performed at a single centre between January 2017 and August 2022. The double-vitrification group included frozen blastocysts that were vitrified after 5-7 days of culture, warmed, biopsied (either once or twice) and re-vitrified. The single vitrification (SV) group included fresh blastocysts that were biopsied at 5-7 days and then vitrified. RESULTS: A comparison of the 84 double-vitrification blastocysts and 729 control single-vitrification blastocysts indicated that the double-vitrification embryos were frozen later in development and had expanded more than the single-vitrification embryos. Of the 813 embryo transfer procedures reported, 452 resulted in the successful delivery of healthy infants (56%). There were no significant differences between double-vitrification and single-vitrification embryos in the pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rates achieved after single-embryo transfer (55% versus 56%). Logistic regression indicated that while reduced live birth rates were associated with increasing maternal age at oocyte collection, longer culture prior to freezing and lower embryo quality, double vitrification was not a significant predictor of live birth rate. CONCLUSIONS: Blastocyst double vitrification was not shown to impact pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rates. Although caution is necessary due to the study size, no effects of double vitrification on miscarriage rates, birthweight or gestation period were noted. These data offer reassurance given the absence of the influence of double vitrification on all outcomes after PGT-A.
RESUMO
RESEARCH QUESTION: What were the clinical outcomes from 332 autologous vitrified- warmed oocyte cycles derived from 3182 elective autologous oocyte freeze cycles carried out between 2008 and 2022 in a single-centre series? DESIGN: In this retrospective observational study, outcomes in 299 patients returning to use their frozen oocytes between 2015 and 2023 were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 3328 elective oocyte vitrification cycles were performed in 2280 patients. The return rate to use oocytes was 14% (299/2171). Mean ages were 37.6 years at storage and 40 at warming. Ninety-three clinical pregnancies and 77 healthy live births were recorded. The live birth rate (LBR) was 24% (39/163) per fresh transfer and 17% (39/227) per embryo transferred. Stratified by age at freezing, the LBR per embryo transferred was 26% (12/47) in participants under 35 years, 20% (24/118) in those 35-39 years and 5% (3/62) in those 40+ years. Frozen embryo transfers (FET) achieved a 30% (24/80) LBR per embryo transfer and a 27% (24/90) LBR per embryo transferred. PGT-A for embryo selection doubled the LBR compared with FET from an untested embryo after one attempt (40% versus 21%). In patients aged over 40 years, the cumulative LBR reached 42% per patient in euploid FET. CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients who returned to use their stored oocytes and the clinical outcomes were consistent with other recent reports and challenges the prevalent critical narrative regarding elective oocyte freezing for fertility preservation. The results are now comparable to routine IVF. Not everyone who returns to use their oocytes will conceive, but for those choosing to preserve their fertility, oocyte freezing can provide reproducible and reassuring results.
