RESUMO
Introduction A proportionate short stature (SS) assessment involves the documentation of normal growth hormone secretion via a growth hormone (GH) stimulation test. All available GH stimulation tests have some disadvantages. The decision to initiate GH therapy is dependent on multiple factors, including the GH stimulation test result. However, many patients receive GH therapy, even if they have a normal GH stimulation test result, with the indication of a presumed idiopathic SS. Objective In this study, we investigated the use of the GH stimulation test result in initiating GH therapy. Method A cross-sectional study was conducted with patients diagnosed with proportionate SS. Age, gender, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) level, and GH stimulation test results were collected retrospectively from the electronic medical records. The main outcome variable was the decision related to prescribing GH therapy. Results A total of 286 patient charts were reviewed, and the majority (n = 201, 64.6%) were male. For just less than half (n = 136, 47.6%), the result of the GH stimulation test was ≥ 10 ng/mL, in a small proportion (n = 53, 18.5%) the result was < 5 ng/mL, and for the rest of the cohort, the result was 5.0 - 9.9 ng/mL. The majority (n = 219, 70.4%) received GH therapy, irrespective of the GH stimulation test result. The odds ratio (OR) for GH treatment was 3.9 (CI: 1.79 - 8.49) and 3.0 (CI: 1.21 - 7.42) for patients with a result < 5 ng/mL and 5.0 - 9.9 ng/mL, respectively, compared to the group with a result of ≥ 10 ng/mL. Conclusion GH therapy is frequently prescribed for patients with SS, irrespective of the GH stimulation test result. However, the group with SS with a result of < 9.9 ng/mL was more likely to receive GH therapy. The question of whether a GH stimulation test is required, in the context of SS, is debatable.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of in vitro fertilization (IVF) on school performance and long-term outcomes in very preterm children aged 8-16 years. METHODS: Seventy-nine children born after IVF were compared with 79 randomly selected matched controls born after spontaneous conception (SC). Information was obtained from parents via a questionnaire administered through telephone interviews looking into school performance, including preschool education, repeated grades, extra lessons, special education needs, and learning difficulties; long-term status, including incidence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism; and family profile. Gross motor function was assessed against the gross motor function classification system based on information given by the subjects' families. RESULTS: Mothers of IVF children were more likely to have a high educational level than mothers of SC children. Moreover, a greater proportion of IVF children had received preschool education than SC children. After adjusting for potential confounders, there was no difference in the school performance or long-term outcomes between IVF and SC children. CONCLUSION: In our study, the school performance and long-term outcomes of very preterm children born after IVF and of their spontaneously conceived peers were comparable. This information can help provide guidance to families and educators.
