The influence of perioperative enoxaparin on bleeding after TORS oropharyngectomy.

Perioperative enoxaparin is often avoided in patients undergoing transoral robotic (TORS) oropharyngectomy. Our goal was to quantify the risk of postoperative hemorrhage (POH) in patients receiving enoxaparin after TORS oropharyngectomy. This was a retrospective database cohort study set up in 89 separate healthcare organizations. The TriNetX electronic database was queried for patients with OPSCC who underwent TORS oropharyngectomy. Propensity-score matching was used to create two cohorts, one receiving and one not receiving perioperative enoxaparin. Outcome measures were the POH rate within 1 day of surgery ("primary") and POH rate within 2-30 days of surgery ("secondary"). 1109 patients undergoing TORS for OPSCC were identified, 400 of which received perioperative enoxaparin. One-to-one propensity score matching resulted in 310 patients per cohort. After matching, the primary POH rates between patients receiving and not receiving enoxaparin were 3.23% for both cohorts (OR 1.000, 95% CI 0.410 to 2.438). The secondary POH rates between those receiving and not receiving enoxaparin were 5.47% vs. 3.54% (OR 1.577, 95% CI 0.726 to 3.424). The number needed to harm (NNH) with perioperative enoxaparin use for secondary POH after TORS was 53; no difference was found in primary POH rates. While not statistically significant, the use of perioperative enoxaparin after TORS is associated with increased odds of secondary POH with a NNH of 53; no difference was found in rates of primary POH. For patients undergoing TORS, enoxaparin use requires careful weighing of the risks and benefits.

Gender Differences in Adults With Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: Gender differences in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) have been demonstrated in many studies over the last 15 years. The purpose of this scoping review is to investigate the current knowledge on gender differences in CRS and to analyze the gaps in the literature. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases was performed. REVIEW METHODS: This scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Studies that evaluated gender differences in CRS were included in the review. RESULTS: Of the 523 abstracts reviewed, a total of 23 studies met the criteria for inclusion. Articles consisted of retrospective and prospective cohort studies. They were divided into 3 categories based on whether they evaluated gender differences in (1) presentation and baseline quality of life, (2) pathophysiology, and/or (3) outcomes of treatment. Eleven studies addressed differences in presentation, 5 addressed differences in pathophysiology, and 10 dealt with differences in outcomes after surgical or medical management. Most of the studies showed worse baseline QoL secondary to CRS in women, with outcome of treatment being similar in both genders. CONCLUSION: The experience of CRS appears to vary between genders, with women experiencing a greater subjective burden of disease than men, though with similar outcomes after treatment. Further research is indicated, particularly involving the pathophysiology of CRS, to fully understand the underlying causes of these discrepancies.

Impact of recurrent acute rhinosinusitis on quality of life.

KEY POINTS: Quality of life (QoL) in patients with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS) is understudied. QoL for RARS patients is similar to chronic rhinosinusitis patients, although objective disease severity is lower. QoL of RARS patients is similarly affected during active and inactive infection.

Gender Differences in Quality of Life of Adolescent Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the differences in the impact of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) between female and male adolescent patients at presentation. STUDY DESIGN: Cross sectional study. METHODS: Adolescent patients, age 12 to 18 years old, presenting to our Otolaryngology clinic between August 2020 and April 2023 for CRS were asked to fill both the SNOT-22 and the SN5 forms. Female and male cohorts were compared regarding their demographics, comorbidities, subjective and objective disease measurements, and choice of treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included, 30 female and 36 male patients. There were no differences in age, allergic rhinitis, asthma, obstructive sleep apnea, presence of nasal septal deviation, and objective disease severity (P > .05 for all). At presentation, mean overall SNOT-22, ear/facial, sleep, and psychological domains were all higher in female patients (43vs 30.9, P = .02; 9.1vs 6, P = .03; 11.8vs 8.3, P = .07; 14.1vs 8.8, P = .02 respectively). SN5 scores and overall QoL visual analog scale were similar in females and males. CONCLUSION: Female patients with CRS show higher subjective disease burden. Incorporating data on gender-specific differences may be important to personalize treatment decision making.

Association of autoimmune disorders with chronic rhinosinusitis in adults.

INTRODUCTION: Increasing evidence suggests that autoimmune disorders and their immunomodulating medications may increase the risk of rhinosinusitis compared to rhinitis. GOAL: To investigate the association between autoimmune disorders and rhinosinusitis. METHODS: We performed a case-control study of patients referred to West Virginia University from August 2020 to October 2022 for rhinologic complaints. Rhinosinusitis patients were diagnosed with either chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) or recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS). These patients were compared to non-rhinosinusitis patients. Patients' characteristics, comorbidities, and type of treatment of autoimmune disorders were reviewed. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 527 rhinosinusitis [184 CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), 263 CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and 80 RARS patients] patients and 564 non-rhinosinusitis patients. Patients with rhinosinusitis were more likely to be older, males, have asthma, and have current and past smoking history (all with p-value < 0.05). Autoimmune disorders, primary antibody deficiency, and immunomodulator agents were more common in rhinosinusitis patients (16.5 % vs 9.4 %, OR = 1.9, p < 0.001; 5.1 % vs 0.5 %, OR = 10.1, p < 0.001; and 3.8 % vs 1.1 %, OR = 3.7, p = 0.003 respectively). Multivariate logistic regression adjusting for confounders showed that autoimmune disorders were strongly associated with rhinosinusitis [OR = 1.6, 95 % CI = 1.10-2.48], whereas the immunomodulators did not reach statistical significance [OR = 2.4, 95 % CI = 0.87-6.47]. Subgroup analysis showed the autoimmune disorders did not significantly differ between CRS and RARS groups [OR = 1.0, 95 % CI = 0.5-2.1], or between the CRSsNP and CRSwNP groups [OR = 0.9, 95 % CI = 0.5-1.7]. CONCLUSION: Autoimmune disorders are associated with rhinosinusitis, both CRS and RARS, independently of other risk factors.

An Observational Study of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring as a Safety Mechanism in Placement of Percutaneous Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation and Spinal Cord Stimulation Systems.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous neurostimulator device placement, specifically dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation and spinal cord stimulation (SCS), involves the placement of thin wires within the spinal canal at specific locations, the DRG or dorsal column of the spinal cord, respectively, to provide an electrical current that modifies the pain signal as it enters the central nervous system from the periphery. Placement of neurostimulator devices is generally safe overall, but not without risk of major and minor complications. In this study, we assess the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) as a tool to improve the safety of placing neurostimulator devices and subsequently minimizing postoperative complications. METHODS: After IRB approval, an observational study was performed in 115 procedures to evaluate safety during placement of both temporary and permanent DRG and SCS systems and to document retrospectively any long-standing adverse events. RESULTS: The rate of intraoperative neuromonitoring abnormal activity was 1.7% (n = 2), which allowed prompt recognition of nerve irritation and lead repositioning. Of the 115 consecutive implant cases performed with IONM, the postoperative minor adverse event rate was 1.7% (n = 2), which were transient and corrected with reprogramming. There were no long-standing neurological complications. CONCLUSION: In the largest observational study to date, we show that IONM creates a safe environment for patients undergoing SCS and DRG neurostimulator placement with the potential to decrease neurological complication rates. The use of IONM may be an alternative method to improve patient safety and outcomes as compared to monitor anesthesia care.