Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 23(1): 24-30, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36697010

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at increased risk of coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Personal protective equipment (PPE) and infection control guidelines help limit transmission. However, poor confidence leads to higher levels of anxiety rates and infection. We assessed knowledge and confidence in PPE among HCWs and associated anxiety. METHODS: A cross-sectional, multi-centre survey using a validated questionnaire assessing actual and self-perceived knowledge on PPE was distributed among HCWs across the UK. Confidence in PPE and levels of anxiety were assessed using the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) tool. RESULTS: In total, 1,055 responses were received; 99% had familiarity with PPE guidance; however, only 15% correctly answered questions on PPE guidance; 86% and 80% had received mask-fitting and donning-doffing training, respectively; 33% indicated poor/very poor hospital communication. Confidence and anxiety were related to: profession; comorbidities; self-perceived knowledge; and PPE training and communication. CONCLUSION: Confidence in PPE was poor and anxiety was related to inadequate information and training. Thus, improved communication is required for effective response to subsequent COVID-19 waves and similar pandemics.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Transversais , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Ansiedade , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
2.
Surgeon ; 19(6): e440-e445, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33648854

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 is a pandemic that forced a transformation in the services provided by the National Health Service in the United Kingdom. Fragility hip fractures account for over 65,000 cases per year in the elderly population. The study aims to assess the impact of the pandemic on fragility hip fractures. METHODS: A retrospective data gather was performed to identify fragility hip fractures from the 23rd of March 2020 to the 13th of May 2020, and from the 23rd of March 2019 to the 13th of May 19. Two groups were formed and compared over their 30 day follow up. RESULTS: The control group comprised of 97 patients, with a mean age of 82.1 years old (62-102 years) and M:F ratio of 38:59. The case group comprised of 102 patients, with a mean age of 82.3 years old (60-100 years) and a M:F ratio of 16:86. Significant differences between groups were identified for gender (p < 0.001), time to theatre (p = 0.002), length of stay (p < 0.001) and COVID-19 status (p = 0.001). In the Case group, association with mortality was found for male gender (p = 0.041), right side (p = 0.031) and COVID-19 positive test results (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Early surgical intervention is advocated wherever possible, and sufficient optimisation, prior to surgery whenever a COVID-19 positive patient is identified. A safe rehabilitation environment is paramount for recovery in this group of patients. Further studies are required to understand the effect of this pandemic on the fragility hip fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Retrospective case-control study.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Fraturas do Quadril , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Medicina Estatal , Centros de Traumatologia , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...