The short-term effect of water-pipe smoking on the baroreflex control of heart rate in normotensives.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study is to analyse the acute effect of water-pipe smoking on heart rate, blood pressure and the baroreflex control of heart rate. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Non-invasive continuous methods were used for investigating inter-beat interval (IBI; ms), systolic blood pressure (SBP; mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (DBP; mm Hg), pulse pressure (PP; mm Hg), mean blood pressure (MBP; mm Hg); baroreflex sensitivity in ms/mm Hg (BRS) and baroreflex sensitivity in Hz/mm Hg (BRSf), were determined by spectral analysis, in 20 normotensive volunteers age of 27+/-6 years (mean+/-S.D.) who served as their own control. The measurements were taken twice. The first measurement was taken before the water-pipe smoking session (this is after >12 h of smoking cessation with a complete stopping of alcohol, coffee or tea consumption). The second measurement was taken during a 5 min period immediately after that session. (In the smoking session the volunteer smokes 5 g Maassel (fruit flavoured tobacco) for a period of 45 min). RESULTS: The inter-beat interval decreased (846+/-100 to 709+/-109 ms, p=0.0003), SBP increased (110+/-13 to 123+/-12 mm Hg, p=0.004), DBP increased (67+/-11 to 81+/-11 mm Hg, p=0.0002), PP decreased (43+/-10 to 41+/-9 mm Hg, p=0.46 ns), MBP increased (82+/-10 to 95+/-11 mm Hg, p=0.0001), BRS decreased (9.16+/-4 to 5.67+/-3 ms/mm Hg, p=0.003) and BRSf (0.013+/-0.005 to 0.011+/-0.004 Hz/mm Hg, p=0.3 ns). CONCLUSIONS: Water-pipe smoking induced a high increase in heart rate, SBP, DBP, MBP and markedly impaired BRS. All of those markers are known as risk factors in cardiovascular diseases, hence it is concluded that water-pipe smoking is not as harmless as is thought.

Baroreflex sensitivity during psychological stress.

The aim of this study was to analyse the changes of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and their relation to changes of heart rate and blood pressure in medical students during moderate psychological stress brought about by oral examination. The changes of BRS during the stress were compared with the changes during light physical exercise. Thirty three students were examined 30 min before and 30 min after the exam. Thirty-nine students of control group were examined at rest and during light exercise. Blood pressure was noninvasively recorded by Penáz method at rate-controlled breathing (0.33 Hz). The BRS [ms/mm Hg] and BRSf [Hz/mm Hg] were calculated by spectral analysis of spontaneous fluctuations of blood pressure and inter-beat intervals (IBI). BRS before examination (7.12 ms/mm Hg) was significantly lower than after the oral exam (8.77 ms/mm Hg, p<0.05). The difference between BRS in the test group after the oral exam and the control group at rest (10.78 ms/mm Hg) was not significant. BRS during light exercise (7.44 ms/mm Hg) corresponded to the value during psychological stress. The values of BRSf did not change during psychological stress (before: 0.0182 Hz/mm Hg; after: 0.0182 Hz/mm Hg) and exercise (rest: 0.0158 Hz/mm Hg; exercise: 0.0144 Hz/mm Hg). Correlation between BRS or BRSf and blood pressure were not found. A significant negative correlation (r=-0.404, p<0.05) between BRSf and the increase of diastolic blood pressure during stress was observed. It is concluded that BRSf remained constant during psychological stress and exercise, and differed essentially from that in hypertensive subjects.