Undifferentiated Endometrial Carcinoma, an Immunohistochemical Study Including PD-L1 Testing of a Series of Cases From a Single Cancer Center.

Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (UEC) is a rare and poorly recognized entity, associated with a poor outcome. The clinical, pathologic, and immunohistochemical features of 17 cases diagnosed at our center are described. The median age was 60 yr. Postmenopausal bleeding was the most common presenting symptom (76.9%). Most patients presented with advanced stage (64.7%). Total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was the commonly offered surgical treatment (80.0%). Nine (52.9%) patients received adjuvant treatment. The median overall survival was 11 mo. Pure UEC was seen in 8 cases (47.0%), while dedifferentiated carcinoma in 5 cases (29.4%). The epithelial component was part of carcinosarcoma or was mixed with serous carcinoma in 2 cases (11.8%) each. Positivity for one or more of the cytokeratin cocktails, mostly as strong focal staining, was evident in 16 cases (94.1%). PAX-8 was negative in 13 cases (86.7%). BRG-1/SMARCA4 was lost in 3 cases (20.0%). Eleven cases (64.7%) were MLH1/PMS2 deficient. Ten cases (66.7%) were positive for programmed death ligand 1, with positivity in 10%, 20%, and 100% of tumor cells detected in a single case each. Only 2 of 11 (18.2%) referral cases were correctly diagnosed as UEC. UEC is a rare tumor that is frequently misdiagnosed. A panel of immunostains is necessary to make the correct diagnosis. The range of positivity for programmed death ligand 1 testing suggests that immunotherapy might be considered in the adjuvant setting, especially with the poor response of this tumor to traditional therapies.

Prognostic factors that govern localized synovial sarcoma: a single institution retrospective study on 51 patients.

Synovial sarcoma is a rare type of sarcoma with poor prognosis. Data on relevant prognostic factors are inconsistent. The objective of this study was to determine the independent prognostic factors that govern local recurrence, distant metastasis and overall survival. A retrospective analysis of 51 patients treated for localized synovial sarcoma at a single institution by a multidisciplinary/multimodality approach over a period of 12 years. Patients, tumor and treatment characteristics were collected including age, sex, tumor site, location, depth, size, status of margins, histology subtype and involvement of bone or lymph nodes. Type of surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were also examined. The endpoints analyzed were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). Median age of patients was 26 years (range 3-64 years) with 73 % above the age of 20 year. All patients received surgery, 57 % received adjuvant radiotherapy and 45 % adjuvant chemotherapy. The median survival was 111 months, and 5-year OS was 73 %. Deep seatedness of the tumor was linked to OS as the only independent risk factor. Twelve patients had local recurrence, and the 5-year LRFS was 61 %. Multivariate analysis determined negative margins and adjuvant radiotherapy as independent predicting factors for LRFS. Five-year MFS was 48 %; multivariate analysis identified monophasic subtype and site other than lower extremity as the only independent factors associated with inferior MFS. The most important factors that govern LRFS and MFS are negative margins and adjuvant radiotherapy for LRFS and tumor histology and site for MFS, while deep seatedness of the tumor is the sole independent factor that governs OS.

Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma: a diagnosis frequently overlooked.

Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma (UEC) is a relatively uncommon neoplasm with only few studies published thus far. It has always been a diagnostic challenge because of the lack of proper definition cited in most of the standard textbooks. Recently however, a few studies have highlighted the clinicopathologic features of UEC. The distinctive morphology of UEC was noted by the group from MD Anderson Cancer Center, which enabled them to establish the defining criteria. It appears to be more aggressive than endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma, FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) grade 3, its main differential diagnosis. Proper recognition of this entity is important owing to its aggressive behavior.