Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 22(7): 753-759, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21198894

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study the osseointegration of dental implants placed with a modified surgical technique in Beagle dogs and to compare it with the conventional method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dental implants were placed bilaterally in the mandible of Beagle dogs using the press-fit as well as undersized implant bed preparation technique. Micro computer tomography (micro-CT) and histometric methods were used to analyze the bone implant contact and bone volume (BV) around the implants. RESULTS: The bone-to-implant contact percentage (BIC: expressed as %), first BIC (1st BIC: expressed in mm), sulcus depth (SD: expressed in mm) and connective tissue thickness (CT: expressed in mm) were analyzed for both groups. The BIC percentage was significantly higher for the undersized installed implants (P=0.0118). Also, a significant difference existed between the undersized and press-fit installed implants for the first screw thread showing bone contact (P=0.0145). There were no significant differences in mucosal response (SD and CT) for both installation procedures. Also, no significant difference was found in the BV, as measured using micro-CT, between the implants placed with an undersized technique (59.3 ± 4.6) compared with the press-fit implants (56.6 ± 4.3). CONCLUSION: From the observations of the study, it can be concluded that an undersized implant bed can enhance the implant-bone response.


Assuntos
Implantação Dentária Endóssea/métodos , Implantes Dentários , Osseointegração/fisiologia , Animais , Tecido Conjuntivo/fisiologia , Cães , Implantes Experimentais , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagem , Mandíbula/cirurgia , Propriedades de Superfície , Microtomografia por Raio-X
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...