RESUMO
Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the leading causes of death globally. Although abdominal or peritoneal TB is a recognised site for extrapulmonary TB to manifest, the diagnosis is often delayed due to the non-specific nature of the presenting clinical features. We present the diagnostically challenging case of a 32-year-old patient with recurrent episodes of fever and a non-productive cough that was initially treated as community-acquired pneumonia with oral antibiotics. A computed tomography scan of the thorax was unrevealing, aside from a large volume of ascites within the partially imaged upper abdomen. The patient did not report any abdominal symptoms and the abdominal examination was unremarkable. Subsequently, a transvaginal ultrasound, a contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis, and magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen and pelvis confirmed a large volume of ascites in the absence of any definite aetiology. A peritoneal biopsy was required before the diagnosis of peritoneal TB was eventually confirmed. This case highlights the importance of considering peritoneal TB in patients presenting with treatment-resistant chest symptoms and persistent pyrexia of undetermined aetiology, even in the absence of abdominal signs and symptoms.
RESUMO
Splenic artery pseudoaneurysms (PAs) are uncommon and often occur as a complication of pancreatitis or trauma. Unlike true aneurysms, PAs are symptomatic in a majority of cases and patients can present with a constellation of non-specific symptoms. Diagnosis can be challenging due to variation in presenting features and mimicking pathologies. PAs are associated with a very high morbidity and mortality if left untreated. We present an unusual case of a 47-year-old gentleman diagnosed with a splenic artery pseudoaneurysm despite initial negative catheter angiography and discuss the challenges of splenic artery pseudoaneurysm diagnosis and management.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: People with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) are at increased risk of postoperative complications if their HbA1C readings are not well controlled. In the UK, there are clear national guidelines requiring all people with DM to have HbA1C blood testing within 6months before undergoing surgery and that these readings should be below 69 mmol/mol if this is safe to achieve. The aim of this study was to determine whether hospitals in the region were compliant with the guidelines. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected from seven hospitals across the East of England region from 1st October 2017 to 31st March 2018 (6 months) in all people with DM undergoing elective day case procedures in General and Vascular surgery for benign disease. RESULTS: A total of 181 people with DM were included in the study, of whom 77.9% were male patients and the median age was 63 years. The three most commonly performed operations were laparoscopic cholecystectomy (20.9%, n = 38/181), inguinal hernia repair (20.4%, n = 37/181) and umbilical/para-umbilical hernia repair (11.0%, n = 20/181). In keeping with the national guidelines, only 86.7% (n = 157/181) of patients had an HbA1C tested within 6 months prior to their surgery date. Of the patients who had a preoperative HbA1C, 14 (n = 14/157, 8.9%) had an HbA1C ≥ 69 mmol/mol, and 12 (n = 12/14, 85.7%) of these proceeded to surgery without optimisation of their HbA1C. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of people with diabetes undergoing elective day case procedures in our region do not have HbA1C testing within 6 months of their procedure as recommended by the national guidelines. In patients who do have a high HbA1C, the majority still undergo surgery without adequate control of their DM. Greater awareness amongst healthcare workers and robust pathways are required for this vulnerable group of patients if we are to reduce the risk of developing postoperative complication rates.