Identifying value in healthcare transformation initiatives: an evaluation of an approach to benefits realisation.

Benefits realisation management (BRM) aims to facilitate the process of identifying, measuring and tracking desired benefits derived from a project. Improvement methodology frameworks often describe BRM as integral to identifying and measuring value derived from transformation initiatives within the National Health Service and beyond. Despite this, reporting of benefits realisation plans and methodological approaches to identifying and measuring benefits remains surprisingly scarce.This project aimed to pilot and evaluate the application of a purpose-designed benefits mapping template with seven newly funded transformation projects across three hospitals in the UK. The scope of the template was to identify key project benefits and metrics associated with the project initiatives. Plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were used to capture the approach and utilisation of the template by project teams. These methods also enabled critical review of the template as an enabler to identifying relevant benefits and project metrics.Stakeholder engagement with the templates was variable. This was attributed to clinical pressures induced by the second wave of COVID-19 in the UK. Despite this, teams were able to produce completed templates outlining a number of wide-ranging benefits. Themes of benefits drawn from the maps include patient experience, patient outcomes, staff experience, access to care and efficiency. Qualitative feedback from teams included the reported value of a structured template to help recognise all the potential benefits associated with each project initiative. The PDSA cycles highlighted the template as an early step in BRM. Further components to this process are recommended to include consensus of the key metrics to be measured, a tool that summarises the reporting details of those metrics, and an effective means to collate reported metrics overtime.

"Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the post-traumatic growth inventory with university students in Jordan.

Post-traumatic Growth plays a key role to cope with traumatic incidents. The scale for Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) has been used by several researchers in different languages. This study aims to evaluate the Arabic-translated version of the PTGI scale by focusing on its validity in different languages and contexts. This study introduces an Arabic version of the PTGI-M normed with 417 undergraduate students at a large university in Jordan. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest reliability of the instrument were 0.97 and 0.82, respectively. Bivariate correlation was used to approximate the concurrent validity (CV). Significant correlations were found between the PTGI-M and the beck depression inventory (BDI), perceived stress scale (PSS), Taylor's manifest anxiety (TMAS), satisfaction with life (SWL), and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess the convergent and discriminant validity of the translated scale. Convergent and discriminant validity was established for the Arabic version of the PTGI-M by conducting a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In conclusion, this study proposes that future investigations should consider analysing the total PTGI-M subtotal scores to comprehend the complexity of the post-traumatic growth experience.