Violence against nurses in hospitals: prevalence and effects.

There is abundant evidence to suggest that violence in healthcare settings, especially in emergency departments (EDs) and psychiatry, is escalating and that nurses are particularly vulnerable. The authors, therefore, investigated the prevalence and effects of violence against nurses in an ED in a general hospital setting in Kuwait. A 12-item frequency-weighted questionnaire was used to measure rates, frequency and severity of violence. The questions related to the experience of violent incidents during the past year. Seventy out of 81 nurses experienced verbal insults or threats of imminent violence and 13 were also physically attacked during the 1-year period. Sixty-seven out of 70 nurses suffered from one or more after-effects, including flashbacks, sleeplessness, fearfulness, depression or taking time off work. Violence in healthcare services often reflects the community in which service is provided. Our findings suggest that doctors experience more violence but nurses suffer from more after-effects of violence at work.

Violence towards doctors: prevalence and effects.

Violence against doctors has already been identified as a matter of particular concern. Both the severity and the psychological sequelae of violence are difficult to quantify. This study was aimed at measuring the rates and severity, and determining the effects, of violence in doctors working in a general hospital.

Violence against doctors: 1. A study of violence against doctors in accident and emergency departments.

The risk of violence directed at health care professionals in their working environment has aroused widespread concern in recent years. Clinical areas most associated with violence are accident and emergency departments, psychiatry, and general practice. Surveyed physicians reported rates of violence against them to vary from 54% to 79%. Violence, however, is difficult to quantify and there is wide variation between the severity of incidents recorded by different workers. This study was an attempt to measure the incidence and the severity of violence against doctors in accident and emergency departments in Kuwait. Eighty-seven (86%) out of 101 of our doctors reported having experienced verbal insults or imminent threat of violence; in addition, 28% had also experienced physical attacks, and 7% had experienced physical assaults likely to have caused serious or fatal injury. Similarly, out of a total of 781 violent incidents reported by our doctors, 73 involved physical attacks, and eight involved physical assaults likely to have caused serious or fatal injury.

Violence against doctors: 2. Effects of violence on doctors working in accident and emergency departments.

There is abundant evidence to suggest that doctors are increasingly being exposed to violent incidents at their workplace. The possible effects of aggression on an individual are varied and likely to depend on the severity and frequency of episodes and the perceived vulnerability to further episodes. The reported sequaelae of violent incidents towards doctors include varied psychological disturbances, and changes in behaviour, such as increasing prescribing, ongoing fear of violence at work, and poor staff morale. We investigated the effects of violence against doctors in the accident and emergency departments in Kuwait. Seventy-five (86%) out of 87 doctors exposed to violent incidents reported one or more of the symptoms consisting of: depression, reliving experience (flashbacks), insomnia, and taking 'time off'. The effects lasted for more than 4 weeks in 25, for 3-4 weeks in 17, and for 2-3 weeks in 21. The duration of symptoms was longer in doctors exposed to verbal insults or threats of imminent violence coupled with incidents involving single acts of violence. Out of a total of 101 doctors; 90 (89%) remained worried about violence at work and 72 (71%) thought training to deal with potentially violent situations would be useful.

Comparative study of the efficacy of lysine acetylsalicylate, indomethacin and pethidine in acute renal colic.

The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of intravenous lysine acetylsalicylate 1.8 g, indomethacin 100 mg and pethidine 100 mg in acute renal colic in a randomized double-blind clinical trial. One hundred and fifty patients with acute renal colic were divided into three groups. The first group received lysine acetylsalicylate 1.8 g, the second group received indomethacin 100 mg and the third group received pethidine 100 mg. The degree of pain relief was recorded 5, 15, 30 and 60 min after intravenous administration of the drugs. There was no statistically significant difference between the degree of analgesia provided by pethidine and indomethacin. Lysine acetylsalicylate was less effective than indomethacin and pethidine. It is concluded that intravenous indomethacin is an effective alternative to intravenous pethidine in the treatment of acute renal colic. Intravenous lysine acetylsalicylate is inferior to intravenous indomethacin in treatment of acute renal colic.