Awareness of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors by Community Pharmacists in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists in community settings are recognized as highly accessible healthcare practitioners and demonstrate a crucial role in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Evidence indicates that community pharmacists can make a significant impact on controlling cardiovascular disease risk factors, particularly on hypertension. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the knowledge of community pharmacists in Saudi Arabia regarding cardiovascular disease risk factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional study involving community pharmacists was conducted. The knowledge of cardiovascular disease risk factors was assessed with the Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire (HDFQ). A web link for an anonymous questionnaire was shared with the licensed community pharmacists in Saudi Arabia using the "Seha" platform of the Ministry of Health. Data analysis was performed with R version 4.0.5. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-four community pharmacists responded to the questionnaire. Many community pharmacists (94.4%) had satisfactory awareness of cardiovascular disease risk factors. The odds of having satisfactory HDFQ knowledge for community pharmacists seeing more than 20 individuals with diabetes per month were 20 times (AOR = 19.9, 95% CI: 1.73-260, and p = 0.019) more compared to those seeing fewer than 10 individuals with diabetes per month. The age of the community pharmacists and the average number of individuals with diabetes seen per month were found to be factors associated with satisfactory HDFQ knowledge. CONCLUSION: The practicing pharmacists had a substantial understanding of cardiovascular disease risk factors. In line with counseling and education, the implementation of community pharmacy models for improving the knowledge of pharmacists, particularly the young pharmacists, is needed to effectively assist patients with cardiovascular disease.

Hospital pharmacists’ awareness and perspective toward the management of COVID-19 pandemic in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Objectives: This study investigates the hospital pharmacists’ awareness of important facts about the COVID-19 disease and their source of information, as well as their perception. Methods: This cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire was conducted from November 2020 to March 2021 in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The questionnaire was developed via electronic platform and invitations were sent to pharmacists working in private and government hospitals. A multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with awareness of COVID-19. Results: A total of 272 pharmacists submitted their responses via weblink. Many pharmacists (n=228, 84%) followed the latest COVID-19 updates on treatment and updated their information mainly through World Health Organization documents (n=151, 56%). Pharmacists working in secondary and tertiary hospitals were relatively five-times times (AOR = 4.59; 95% CI: 1.69–12.8; p-value = 0.003) and three-times (AOR = 2.93; 95% CI: 1.35–6.72; p-value = 0.008) more aware of COVID-19 than those working in primary hospitals. Pharmacists with prior adequate knowledge regarding epidemics and pandemics were twotimes more likely to have a good awareness of COVID-19 compared to those who had received none (AOR = 2.15; 95% CI: 1.09–4.35; p-value = 0.030). Conclusions: Half of the pharmacists believed that they received required education in the past about epidemics and pandemics, and many follow the recent COVID-19 updates on medicines predominantly from the WHO followed by the government awareness campaigns. Many pharmacists believed they have a key role in the management of epidemics/pandemics via their hospital pharmacy. However, this study identified certain awareness gaps regarding COVID-19, highlighting areas of improvement. (AU)

Hospital pharmacists' awareness and perspective toward the management of COVID-19 pandemic in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Objectives: This study investigates the hospital pharmacists' awareness of important facts about the COVID-19 disease and their source of information, as well as their perception. Methods: This cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire was conducted from November 2020 to March 2021 in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The questionnaire was developed via electronic platform and invitations were sent to pharmacists working in private and government hospitals. A multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with awareness of COVID-19. Results: A total of 272 pharmacists submitted their responses via weblink. Many pharmacists (n=228, 84%) followed the latest COVID-19 updates on treatment and updated their information mainly through World Health Organization documents (n=151, 56%). Pharmacists working in secondary and tertiary hospitals were relatively five-times times (AOR = 4.59; 95% CI: 1.69-12.8; p-value = 0.003) and three-times (AOR = 2.93; 95% CI: 1.35-6.72; p-value = 0.008) more aware of COVID-19 than those working in primary hospitals. Pharmacists with prior adequate knowledge regarding epidemics and pandemics were two-times more likely to have a good awareness of COVID-19 compared to those who had received none (AOR = 2.15; 95% CI: 1.09-4.35; p-value = 0.030). Conclusions: Half of the pharmacists believed that they received required education in the past about epidemics and pandemics, and many follow the recent COVID-19 updates on medicines predominantly from the WHO followed by the government awareness campaigns. Many pharmacists believed they have a key role in the management of epidemics/pandemics via their hospital pharmacy. However, this study identified certain awareness gaps regarding COVID-19, highlighting areas of improvement.

Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria and Prescription of Antibiotics at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Purpose The purpose of the study was to assess the bacterial resistance and annual antibiotic consumption at a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia over a two-year period. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017. Results The results showed that there was no significant difference between 2016 and 2017 data regarding patient characteristics like bed occupancy rate, the average length of stay, and the number of admissions; the same was true for bacterial characteristics like the number of bacteria, percentage of isolates in the group, and multidrug resistance (MDR) percentage (p: >0.05). Between 2016 and 2017, there was a slight reduction in the sensitivity of Escherichia​​​ coli (E. coli) carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) (97%, 86%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) CRE (80%, 76%) towards colistin. There was also a decrease in the sensitivity of Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) from 42% to 29% against tigecycline, but an increase in the sensitivity of K. pneumoniae CRE (33%, 50%) and E. coli CRE (76%, 82%). The percentage of MDR strains in gram-positive bacteria showed that more than half of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) were methicillin-resistant (61%, 59%) in 2016 and 2017 respectively. There was a reduction in the percentage of MDR strains in some gram-negative bacteria like Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) MDRO (24%, 19%),E. coli extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) (56%, 50%), E. coli CRE (4%, 1%), K. pneumoniae CRE (49%, 33%), A. baumannii CRE (90%, 76%), and Proteus mirabilis​​​​​​​ (P. mirabilis) ESBL (54%, 50%). Conclusion MDRO bacteria are very common in the hospital where the study was conducted. Immediate action is required to tackle this problem.

Adverse drug reaction reporting in a large tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia: results of an incentive strategy.

BACKGROUND: Underreporting is a common problem with spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting. In this study, we aim to describe the reporting of ADRs in a tertiary hospital and determine the effect of incentives to healthcare professionals on ADR reporting. METHODS: In this interventional study, a time series analysis was used to determine the effect of incentives on ADR reporting in a tertiary hospital between 2015 and 2016. The incentive strategy included public commendation of health care providers and nomination for a monthly award. RESULTS: A total of 967 ADRs were reported over a 2-year period. After the introduction of incentives in January 2016, the number of ADR reports per month increased by 40.6 (95% confidence interval: 26.1-55.1). The proportion of serious ADRs reported was significantly higher in 2016 (39/800) than 2015 (0/167) (p < 0.001). In 2016, there was a significant association between profession and serious ADR reporting (p < 0.001). A total of 14/21 ADRs (66.7%) reported by physicians in 2016 were serious compared with 20/700 (2.9%) reported by clinical pharmacists and 5/72 (6.9%) by nurses. CONCLUSIONS: ADR reporting was improved by providing incentives, including commendation and reward, to healthcare professionals.

Analysis of medication errors at a large tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia: a retrospective analysis.

Background Medication errors (MEs) are common in health care settings and pose a threat for the hospitalized population. Therefore, aspects of MEs were explored in a tertiary setting serving a diverse population. Objective To examine the occurrence, severity and reporting of MEs in hospitalized patients. Methods This retrospective analysis included 10,683 ME report forms that were received by the Medication Safety Unit of King Saud Medical City (KSMC) in 2015. ME outcomes were determined according to the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) Index for categorizing MEs algorithm. Results A total of 13,677 MEs in 912,500 prescriptions were reported. The incidence rate of MEs was 1.5% (13,677/912,500). The highest percentage (42.2%) of MEs occurred during the transcription stage, and 70.0% of MEs were reported as near misses. Wrong frequency and wrong concentration accounted for nearly half of the MEs. Conclusion We found 1.5 MEs per 100 prescriptions; more than two-thirds of the MEs were preventable and were intercepted before reaching the patients. Most MEs reported by pharmacists occurred at the transcription stage while wrong frequency was the most common error type encountered. Further studies should explore the clinical consequences of MEs at a healthcare institution.