RESUMO
Kite and Ponseti methods are two popular manipulating methods for correcting the deformity of idiopathic congenital clubfoot. We aimed to compare the efficacy of Kite and Ponseti methods in the treatment of children with idiopathic congenital clubfoot. A search was launched on Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Web of Science, ProQuest, and Scopus without limits, from inception to May 1, 2024. The outcomes included the rates of initial correction and relapse (primary) as well as the number of casts and duration of treatment (secondary). Mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) were calculated for numerical and dichotomous outcomes, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Nine studies were included. Meta-analysis showed the Ponseti method is significantly associated with a higher probability of correction (n = 6, RR = 1.23 [95% CI = 1.14, 1.32], p < 0.001) and a lower risk of relapse (n = 5, RR = 0.50 [95% CI = 0.36, 0.71], p < 0.001) compared to the Kite method. The Ponseti method utilized a lower number of casts (MD = -3.0 [95% CI = -5.8, -0.2], p = 0.04) and took a shorter duration (MD = -39.76 [95% CI = -67.22, -12.30], p = 0.02) than the Kite method. Evidence suggests that the Ponseti method results in better outcomes than the Kite method in terms of successful initial correction and lower relapse rates. However, the available studies showed varying degrees of risk of bias, and the length of follow-up was inadequate in some studies.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Exclusive fat grafting is an alternative method to implant- or flap- based reconstruction techniques following mastectomies or breast conservation therapies. Its efficacy has been explored before but new data has come to light, resulting in previous results becoming outdated. Concerns have also been raised about the oncological safety of this procedure which must be evaluated alongside the efficacy to gain a comprehensive understanding of the merits of this alternative technique. METHODS: We queried the PubMed electronic database from its inception until August 2023 for studies evaluating the efficacy and oncological safety of exclusive fat grafting breast reconstruction following cancer-related mastectomy or breast conservation therapy. Results of the analysis were pooled and presented as means or valid proportions. Results of the analysis were pooled using a random-effects model and presented with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) where appropriate. RESULTS: 41 studies were included in our analysis. Pooled results show that on average, 1.7 sessions of exclusive fat grafting were required to complete reconstruction in Breast Conservation Therapy (BCT) patients, with an average volume of 114.2 ml being injected. For mastectomy patients with irradiated breasts, 4.7 sessions were needed on average with 556.8 ml being required to complete reconstruction, compared to their non-irradiated Counterparts requiring only 2.6 sessions and 207.2 ml to complete reconstruction. Oncological recurrence events were found in 29/583 non-irradiated mastectomy patients (p = 0.014) and in 41/517 BCT patients (p = 0.301) CONCLUSION: Exclusive fat grafting is an oncologically safe and reasonably efficacious alternative to more common methods of breast reconstruction. More data is needed to fully characterize the oncological safety of this procedure in irradiated and non-irradiated mastectomy patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
RESUMO
The utilization of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in lowering the incidence of infections in closed colorectal surgical incisions has not been thoroughly established, and recent trials have had conflicting results. This meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the findings of available trial data and carefully evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention in colorectal surgery. The databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were combed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared negative pressure wound therapy to standard dressing in closed wounds of patients undergoing colorectal surgery. The incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of seroma and hematoma. The trial results were represented as odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and a fixed-effects model was used. Nine studies found eligible were included, and the pooled results revealed that negative pressure wound therapy significantly reduced the incidence of surgical site infections (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.93; P= 0.02). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in seroma (OR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.95; P = 0.04) and hematoma (OR: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.96; P = 0.04). The use of negative pressure wound therapy for primarily closed incisions has been increasing, and our results indicate that it is superior to standard surgical dressings in preventing surgical site infections and other wound complications in colorectal surgeries.
