The Utility of Multimodal Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Spine Surgery: Case Series from a Lower-Middle-Income Country Perspective.

OBJECTIVE: Multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM) using somatosensory-evoked potentials and motor-evoked potentials is a sensitive and specific tool for detecting intraoperative neurologic injury during spine surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the use of multimodal IOM in a lower-middle-income country (LMIC) during cervical and thoracic spine surgery in order to prevent and predict new postoperative neurologic deficits early on. This is the first report of multimodal IOM application in LMICs. METHODS: The neurophysiologist raised the cutoff warning criteria of 50 patients who underwent surgery for different cervical and thoracic pathologies to decrease postoperative neurologic deficits. We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts and neuromonitoring traces of these patients followed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of combined IOM for postoperative neurologic deficit occurrence. RESULTS: A significant relationship was found between the reversibility of alerts and the development of new postoperative deficits (P < 0.001). There was no relationship between the cause of alerts and the reversibility of those alerts after corrective measures were carried out (P = 0.455), or the frequency of alerts and the development of new deficits postoperatively (P = 0.578). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of combined somatosensory-evoked potential and motor-evoked potential monitoring were 100%, 80%, 62.5%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Because of the limited experience and the many technical difficulties faced in LMICs, we found that this cutoff limit resulted in more false-positive warnings but helped to avoid any false-negative results, thus enhancing the safety of surgery.

Somatosensory Evoked Potentials as a Stand-Alone Tool During Spine Surgery: An Egyptian Preliminary Report.

PURPOSE: Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) serves as an early warning system to detect spinal cord injury and is correlated with postoperative sensory findings. It is an indirect indicator of motor function. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of intraoperative SSEPs monitoring as a stand-alone tool during spinal surgeries when motor evoked potentials are not available, to prevent and predict new postoperative neurologic deficits. Motor evoked potentials were not used as the equipment needed to record them was not available at the time of this study. METHODS: This study included 50 patients, aged 14 to 67 years, undergoing extramedullary manipulations, decompression of an epidural abscess or neoplasm, removal of intramedullary tumor, or arteriovenous malformation or spine correction procedures. Somatosensory evoked potentials were analyzed for latency and peak-to-peak amplitude. Critical SSEP changes were defined as a 50% decrease in amplitude or a 10% increase in latency. RESULTS: Somatosensory evoked potentials had an overall sensitivity of 81.8%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 91.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative SSEPs have proved to be highly sensitive and specific for iatrogenic injury, mechanical stress caused by cord traction/compression, dural traction, lowered systemic blood pressure, and cord hypothermia. The reversibility of intraoperative SSEP changes showed a highly significant relation to the number of cases with new postoperative deficits as well as type and site of pathologic study (P = 0.00, P = 0.01, and P = 0.00, respectively) but not with the level of pathologic study (P = 0.49).