Multi-physics study of acoustofluidic delivery agents' clustering behavior.

Acoustofluidicly manipulated microbubbles (MBs) and echogenic liposomes (ELIPs) have been suggested as drug delivery systems for the 'on demand' release of drug in target tissue. This requires a clear understanding of their behaviour during ultrasonication and after ultrasonication stops. The main focus of this study is to investigate the behaviour of MBs and ELIPs clusters after ultrasonication stops and the underlaying cause of cluster diffusion considering electrostatic repulsion, steric repulsion and Brownian motion. It also examines the capability of existing models used to predict MBs' attraction velocity due to secondary radiation force, on predicting ELIPs' attraction velocity. Tunable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS) and phase analysis light scattering (PALS) techniques were used to measure zeta potentials of the agents and the size distributions were measured using TRPS. The zeta potentials were found to be -2.43 mV and -0.62 mV for Definity™ MBs, and -3.62 mV and -2.35 mV for ELIPs using TRPS and PALS, respectively. Both agents were shown to have significant cluster formation at pressures as low as 6 kPa. Clusters of both agents were shown to diffuse as sonication stops at a rate that approximately equals the sum of the diffusion coefficients of the agents forming them. The de-clustering behaviours are due to Brownian motion as no sign of electrostatic repulsion was observed and particles movements were observed to be faster for smaller diameters. These findings are important to design and optimise effective drug delivery systems using acoustofluidically manipulated MBs and ELIPs.

Shell properties and concentration stability of acoustofluidic delivery agents.

This paper investigates the shell elastic properties and the number-concentration stability of a new acoustofluidic delivery agent liposome in comparison to Definity™, a monolayer ultrasonic contrast agent microbubble. The frequency dependent attenuation of an acoustic beam passing through a microbubble suspension was measured to estimate the shell parameters. The excitation voltage was adjusted to ensure constant acoustic pressure at all frequencies. The pressure was kept at the lowest possible magnitude to ensure that effects from nonlinear bubble behaviour which are not considered in the analytical model were minimal. The acoustofluidic delivery agent shell stiffness Sp and friction Sf parameters were determined as (Sp = 0.11 N/m, Sf = 0.31 × 10-6 Kg/s at 25 °C) in comparison to the Definity™ monolayer ultrasound contrast agent which were (Sp = 1.53 N/m, Sf = 1.51 × 10-6 Kg/s at 25 °C). When the temperature was raised to physiological levels, the friction coefficient Sf decreased by 28% for the monolayer microbubbles and by only 9% for the liposomes. The stiffness parameter Sp of the monolayer microbubble decreased by 23% while the stiffness parameter of the liposome increased by a similar margin (27%) when the temperature was raised to 37 °C. The size distribution of the bubbles was measured using Tunable Resistive Pulse Sensing (TRPS) for freshly prepared microbubbles and for bubble solutions at 6 h and 24 h after activation to investigate their number-concentration stability profile. The liposome maintained >80% of their number-concentration for 24 h at physiological temperature, while the monolayer microbubbles maintained only 27% of their number-concentration over the same period. These results are important input parameters for the design of effective acoustofluidic delivery systems using the new liposomes.