Effects of hydroxyurea on fertility in male and female sickle cell disease patients. A systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence supports the benefits of hydroxyurea (HU) in adults with sickle cell disease (SCD), but reservations remain due to long-term concerns of fertility. Retrospective analysis of clinical records of SCD patients (haemoglobin SS genotype) have identified gender-related differences in disease progression. This could inform risk stratification during SCD at diagnosis with the possibility to guide therapeutic decisions. METHODS: This systemic review and meta-analysis evaluated fertility parameters in both children (aged ≥ 6 years) and adults with SCD receiving HU therapy. Studies were sourced from PubMed and EMBASE from inception to July 2023. A total of 160 potentially relevant articles were identified. RESULTS: Four studies were included that evaluated the effects of HU on sperm parameters in males. A further 4 studies assessed anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) levels and ovarian reserves in females. Differences from baseline values were used to identify compromised fertility. Amongst males, HU treatment negatively impacted the concentration of spermatozoa (MD = -15.48 million/mL; 95% CI: [-20.69, -10.26]; p< 0.001), which continued following treatment cessation (MD = -20.09 million/mL; 95% CI: [-38.78, -1.40]; P = 0.04). HU treatment also led to lower total sperm counts (MD = -105.87 million; 95% CI: [-140.61, -71.13]; P< 0.001) which persisted after treatment (MD = -53.05 million; 95% CI: [-104.96, -1.14]; P = 0.05). Sperm volume, initial forward motility and morphology were unaffected by HU treatment. In females, HU treatment decreased the mean AMH levels 1.83 (95% CI [1.42, 2.56]. A total of 18.2.% patients treated with HU showed reduced ovarian reserves. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: This systemic review and meta-analysis suggest that the use of HU for SCD impacts seminal fluid parameters in males and can diminish AMH levels and ovarian reserves in females.

Poor ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology cycles is associated with anti-ovarian antibody and pro-inflammatory immune responses.

Anti-ovarian antibody (AOA) could be considered an independent marker for autoimmune ovarian disease and predicting future premature ovarian failure (POF). This study aims to investigate if AOA is associated with poor ovarian response (POR) and pro-inflammatory immune responses in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles. Two hundred forty-eight women undergoing ART cycles were divided into four groups based on AOA test results and the presence of POR: POR(-)/AOA(-) group (N = 148), POR(+)/AOA(-) group (N = 34), POR (-)/AOA(+) group (N = 44), POR(+)/AOA(+) group (N = 22). The POR patients have a significantly higher prevalence of AOA than non-POR patients (P < 0.05). Peripheral blood CD56 + natural killer (NK) cell level (%), NK cytotoxicity, CD19 +CD5 + B-1 cell level (%), and IFN-γ/IL-10 producing T helper (Th) 1/Th2 cell ratios were significantly higher in POR(+)/AOA(+) group than those of other groups (P < 0.001, P < 0.005, P < 0.01, P < 0.05, respectively). TNF-α/IL-10 producing Th1/Th2 cell ratio of POR(+)/AOA(+) group was significantly higher than those of POR(+)/AOA(-) and POR(-)/AOA(-) groups (P < 0.05, respectively). Homocysteine and vitamin D levels of the POR(+)/AOA(+) group were significantly lower than those of other groups (P < 0.005, respectively). Plasminogen activator inhibiter-1 (PAI-1) level of POR(+)/AOA(+) group was significantly higher than that of POR(-)/AOA(-) group (P < 0.05). In the POR(+)/AOA(+) group, the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies was significantly higher than that of the POR(+)/AOA(-) group (P = 0.005). Women with autoimmune POR (POR(+)/AOA(+)) have dysregulated pro-inflammatory immune responses and metabolic factors. The diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for autoimmune POR should be differentiated from those for non-autoimmune POR.

The role of immunologic tests for subfertility in the clinical environment.

Unexplained subfertility and implantation failures not only are emotionally and physically distressing but also become a significant obstacle to reproductive-age couples who wish to build their family. Often, the currently recommended evaluation for these couples is significantly limited, and many of causes remain unexplained. To obtain an accurate diagnosis and treatment, proper evidence-based laboratory evaluation should be performed. Immune tests for women with subfertility and implantation failures are essential to recognize the immune etiology and appropriate therapeutic strategies. This review focuses on currently used immune tests for subfertile women.

A systemic review of intravenous immunoglobulin G treatment in women with recurrent implantation failures and recurrent pregnancy losses.

Over the last few decades, the advancement in reproductive technologies and protocols to improve embryo quality through culture techniques and genetic testing to eliminate chromosomally abnormal embryos resulted in better pregnancy rates and outcomes after fertility treatments. Unfortunately, some patients still struggle with recurrent implantation failures (RIFs) and recurrent pregnancy losses (RPLs). Immune etiologies have been attributed to play an important role in some of those patients. Maintaining a pre-conceptional anti-inflammatory environment for implantation and pregnancy continuation yields superior results. Intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG) treatment has been reported to enhance reproductive outcome in patients with RIF and RPL with immune dysregulations. In this systemic review, we analyzed outcomes of IVIG trials for RIF and RPL, its mechanism of action, dosing, administration, side-effects, and evidence for its use in women with RIF and RPL.

COVID-19 and immunomodulation treatment for women with reproductive failures.

COVID-19 pandemic is affecting various areas of health care, including human reproduction. Many women with reproductive failures, during the peri-implantation period and pregnancy, are on the immunotherapy using immune modulators and immunosuppressant due to underlying autoimmune diseases, cellular immune dysfunction, and rheumatic conditions. Many questions have been raised for women with immunotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic, including infection susceptibility, how to manage women with an increased risk of and active COVID-19 infection. SARS-CoV-2 is a novel virus, and not enough information exists. Yet, we aim to review the data from previous coronavirus outbreaks and current COVID-19 and provide interim guidelines for immunotherapy in women with reproductive failures.