Shifting From Best Practice to Standard Practice: Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Health Systems.

There is a high prevalence of untreated depression in adults and youth observed at the population level in the United States, and many who would benefit from treatment do not receive it. One proposed effort to increase access to care is the use of measurement-based care (MBC; repeated use of symptom measures for screening and treatment guidance) by primary care physicians to treat non-complex cases of depression. MBC has been shown to improve patient outcomes compared to care as usual, but there are barriers that need to be addressed at the health system level for effective implementation to occur. Herein we provide an overview of MBC and detail benefits and barriers of MBC implementation. Relevant considerations and guidance for implementing MBC are presented, and a case example of a health system implementing MBC is included. Though issues of reimbursement, limited human and technological resources, and resistance to systemic change are barriers to implementing MBC, effective strategies exist to overcome these barriers. In addition to helping health systems align with changes to value-based care models, effective implementation of MBC can likely improve patient outcomes and result in net financial benefits.

Characterizing Measurement-Based Care in the Texas Youth Depression and Suicide Research Network (TX-YDSRN).

Integration of measurement-based care (MBC) into clinical practice has shown promise in improving treatment outcomes for depression. Yet, without a gold standard measure of MBC, assessing fidelity to the MBC model across various clinical settings is difficult. A central goal of the Texas Youth Depression and Suicide Research Network (TX-YDSRN) was to characterize MBC across the state of Texas through the development of a standardized tool to assess the use of MBC strategies when assessing depression, anxiety, side effects, and treatment adherence. A chart review of clinical visits indicated standardized depression measures (71.2%) and anxiety measures (64%) were being utilized across sites. The use of standardized measures to assess medication adherence and side effects was limited to less than six percent for both, with the majority utilizing clinical interviews to assess adherence and side effects; yet medication was changed in nearly half. Rates of utilization of standardized measures for participants with multiple MBC forms were similar to those who only provided one form.