A Case of Late-Onset Neutropenia in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Following Ocrelizumab Therapy.

Ocrelizumab, a monoclonal antibody, has proven effective in treating both primary progressive and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Common adverse effects observed in clinical studies include flushing, sore throat, pruritus, and rash. This abstract discusses a case of severe, late-onset neutropenia in a patient with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis undergoing ocrelizumab treatment. The neutropenia emerged 46 days following the patient's most recent ocrelizumab dose. The patient responded well to treatment with intravenous meropenem and filgrastim. This rare and unforeseen adverse effect highlights the importance of regular blood monitoring for early detection of severe neutropenia in patients treated with ocrelizumab.

Performance of CURB-65 and ISARIC 4C mortality scores for hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection in Saudi Arabia.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic continues with new waves that could persist with the arrival of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. Therefore, the availability of validated and effective triage tools is the cornerstone for proper clinical management. Thus, this study aimed to assess the validity of the ISARIC-4C score as a triage tool for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia and to compare its performance with the CURB-65 score. Material and methods: This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted between March 2020 and May 2021 at KFHU, Saudi Arabia, using 542 confirmed COVID-19 patient data on the variables relevant to the application of the ISARIC-4C mortality score and the CURB-65 score. Chi-square and t-tests were employed to study the significance of the CURB-65 score and the ISARIC-4C score variables considering the ICU requirements and the mortality of COVID-19 hospitalized patients. In addition, logistic regression was used to predict the variables related to COVID-19 mortality. In addition, the diagnostic accuracy of both scores was validated by calculating sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Youden's J indices (YJI). Results: ROC analysis showed an AUC value of 0.834 [95% CI; 0.800-0.865]) for the CURB-65 score and 0.809 [95% CI; 0.773-0.841]) for the ISARIC-4C score. The sensitivity for CURB-65 and ISARIC-4C is 75% and 85.71%, respectively, while the specificity was 82.31% and 62.66%, respectively. The difference between AUCs was 0.025 (95% [CI; -0.0203-0.0704], p = 0.2795). Conclusion: Study results support external validation of the ISARIC-4C score in predicting the mortality risk of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia. In addition, the CURB-65 and ISARIC-4C scores showed comparable performance with good consistent discrimination and are suitable for clinical utility as triage tools for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.