A Canadian Survey on Adverse Symptoms Experienced by Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse symptoms experienced by solid organ transplant recipients remain largely unexplored despite their purported frequency. OBJECTIVE: To characterize patient perspectives on adverse symptoms, identifying the most problematic symptoms and the perceived cause and treatability, and to evaluate their impact on quality of life (QoL) and medication adherence. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed to members of the Canadian Transplant Association, to characterize perceptions on symptom experience (Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Distress Scale), and QoL (Short Form-12), medication adherence (Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale), demographics, and clinical situation. RESULTS: The questionnaire was distributed to 249 solid organ transplant recipients and achieved a 51% response rate (N = 127). Respondents reported a mean of 25 (standard deviation 10) adverse symptoms each. In women, the most prevalent and distressing symptoms were tiredness, lack of energy, sleep difficulties, difficulty concentrating or memory problems, diarrhea, joint pain, and depression. In men, they were tiredness, flatulence, lack of energy, sleep difficulties, and erectile problems. With the exception of flatulence, these symptoms were more often perceived to be caused by medical conditions rather than by immunosuppressants or other medications. Quality of life was similar to the general public, with mean physical and mental component scores of 47.4 (9.9) and 52.1 (8.2), respectively (relative to a US average of 50 [10]). However, QoL scores inversely correlated to the number of symptoms reported and were higher in patients who perceived all symptoms to be treatable. CONCLUSION: Adverse symptoms may impact patient well-being. Perceived cause and treatability should be further explored.

Impact of the SIMPL-SYNC Refill Synchronization Program on medication adherence: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of the SIMPL-SYNC refill synchronization (SSRS) service compared with that of usual care (UC) on medication adherence when applied as an opt-out strategy among patients receiving chronic medications. DESIGN: This was a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The study was conducted in 2 community pharmacies located in Saskatchewan, Canada. Eligible patients were chronic medication users visiting the study pharmacies. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the percentage of individuals achieving optimal adherence to all eligible study medications. Eligible study medications included 22 commonly used medication classes used to treat diverse conditions. Adherence was assessed for each medication class after 300 days using the proportion of days covered (PDC). Optimal adherence was defined as PDC ≥ 80%. RESULTS: A total of 488 patients were screened for eligibility, and 190 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (95 in SSRS, 95 in UC). The mean age of participants was 59 years, and 34% (65/190) were older than 65 years. A total of 574 individual adherence observations representing the 22 eligible study medication classes were generated from the 190 study participants. The percentage of individuals achieving optimal adherence to all their eligible study medications was 50.5% (48/95) in the SSRS group versus 44.2% (42/95) in the UC group (P = 0.383). Similarly, no statistically significant difference was observed in a per-protocol analysis assessing people who participated fully in the service; the percentage of individuals achieving optimal adherence to all their eligible study medications was 55.1% (38/69) in SSRS versus 40.7% (33/81) in UC (P = 0.080). Patient refusal of the refill synchronization services was common among randomized patients. CONCLUSION: SSRS service failed to detect a robust improvement in medication adherence when delivered using an opt-out strategy. However, small improvements in adherence or benefits to specific subgroups of patients could not be ruled out.