Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 172(4): 453-465, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26838067

RESUMO

This study aimed to investigate whether the use of protection devices and attitudes of interventional professionals (including radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, medical imaging technicians and nurses) towards radiation protection will differ between Saudi Arabian and Australian hospitals. Hard copies of an anonymous survey were distributed to 10 and 6 clinical departments in the Eastern province of Saudi Arabia and metropolitan hospitals in Western Australia, respectively. The overall response rate was 43 % comprising 110 Australian participants and 63 % comprising 147 Saudi participants. Analysis showed that Australian respondents differed significantly from Saudi respondents with respect to their usages of leaded glasses (p < 0.001), ceiling-suspended lead screen (p < 0.001) and lead drape suspended from the table (p < 0.001). This study indicates that the trained interventional professionals in Australia tend to adhere to benefit from having an array of tools for personal radiation protection than the corresponding group in Saudi Arabia.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Equipamentos de Proteção/estatística & dados numéricos , Proteção Radiológica/estatística & dados numéricos , Radiologia Intervencionista/métodos , Austrália , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Médicos/psicologia , Proteção Radiológica/instrumentação , Arábia Saudita
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...