Contrast venography vs. microwire assisted axillary venipuncture for cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation.

Aims: This study was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of microwire assisted technique with contrast venography guided axillary venipuncture in patients undergoing cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Methods and results: This prospective randomized study included 212 consecutive adult patients undergoing CIED implantation at our institute between 2013 and 2015. Patients were randomized to either venography guided technique (Group I; n = 105) or microwire assisted technique (Group II; n = 107) for axillary venipuncture. In Group I axillary venogram was used as a roadmap for guiding the puncture. In Group II, a 0.014 inch hydrophilic coronary guidewire ('microwire') was introduced through the ipsilateral antecubital vein and puncture needle was aimed to hit the microwire over the first or second rib. Outcome measures including technical success rates; number of attempts to successful puncture; puncture duration; fluoroscopy times and adverse events were compared in the two groups. Overall success rates were similar in both groups (97.4% in Group I and 100% in Group II, P = 0.061). We demonstrated significantly higher first attempt success rates; shorter puncture durations and fluoroscopy times; and lower number of attempts to successful puncture with microwire assisted technique (89.3% vs. 65.6%; 36.7 ± 23.1 s vs. 67.8 ± 44.9 s; 62.4 ± 35.3 s vs. 118.9 ± 63.2 s; and 1.21 ± 0.82 vs. 2.16 ± 1.54 respectively, P < 0.001). Adverse event rates were significantly lower with microwire assisted technique (0.9% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.009). Conclusion: Microwire assisted technique is a simple, quicker, safer and more efficacious alternative to contrast venography guided axillary venipuncture.

Prevalence and characterization of coronary artery disease in patients with symptomatic bradyarrhythmias requiring pacemaker implantation.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to assess the prevalence and characterization of CAD in high risk patients requiring pacemaker implantation for symptomatic bradyarrhythmias. METHODS: This study included 100 patients with symptomatic sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block, who were at high risk of CAD or had previously documented atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASCVD). Coronary angiography was performed before pacemaker implantation. CAD was defined as the presence of any degree of narrowing in at least one major coronary artery or its first order branch. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥50% diameter stenosis. CAD was categorized as single vessel disease (SVD), double vessel disease (DVD), or triple vessel disease (TVD); and obstructive CAD in the arteries supplying the conduction system was sub-classified according to Mosseri's classification. RESULTS: Out of 100 patients (mean age 64.6±10.7 years), 45 (45%) had CAD. 29% patients had obstructive CAD while 16% had non-obstructive CAD. 53.3% patients had SVD, 15.6% had DVD and 31.1% had TVD. Among patients with obstructive CAD; Type I, II, III and IV coronary anatomies were present in 6.9%, 34.5%, 10.3% and 48.3% patients respectively. Presence of CAD significantly correlated with dyslipidemia (p=0.047), history of smoking (p=0.025), and family history of CAD (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Angiographic CAD is observed in a substantial proportion of patients with symptomatic bradyarrhythmias and risk factors for CAD. It could be argued that such patients should undergo a coronary work-up before pacemaker implantation. Treatment of concomitant CAD is likely to improve the long term prognosis of these patients.

Sheehan syndrome with reversible dilated cardiomyopathy.

Cardiac abnormalities in patients with Sheehan syndrome are uncommon. A case of Sheehan syndrome with dilated cardiomyopathy is presented in whom hormone replacement with levothyroxine and prednisolone resulted in complete recovery of cardiomyopathy. A 25-year-old woman presented with lactation failure, secondary amenorrhea, features of hypothyroidism and a hypocortisol state following severe postpartum hemorrhage after her last child birth. She also had smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis. After starting antitubercular treatment, she developed shock, suggestive of hypocortisol crisis. Hormonal investigations revealed evidence of panhypopitutarism and magnetic resonance imaging revealed partial empty sella. Meanwhile echocardiography revealed evidence of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The patient was given replacement therapy in the form of glucocorticoids and levothyroxine in addition to antitubercular treatment. She improved and on follow-up over a period of 7 months, the DCM completely reversed. To our knowledge this is the first report of reversible DCM in a patient with Sheehan syndrome.