RESUMO
Introduction Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) has emerged as a promising technique for evaluating the extent and severity of Crohn's disease activity. To compare how we measure Crohn's disease activity with MRE and endoscopy. Material and methods We retrospectively reviewed MRE studies of 60 patients with suspicious Crohn's disease who underwent 1.5-T MRI examinations (T1-weighted images pre- and post-IV contrast medium administration and T2-weighted images) and endoscopy within one month, and they were evaluated by one radiology consultant with experience of 17 years. Endoscopy was used as the reference standard for diagnosing active Crohn's disease cases. Data analysis was performed using the websites (www.graphpad.com and www.medcalc.org) and Microsoft Excel (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, USA). Results A total of 35 patients were included in the study. The remaining 25 patients were excluded either due to non-available data in the endoscopy report or cases of non-Crohn's disease. The MRI examinations were reviewed by one radiology consultant and revealed 27 active and eight non-active Crohn's disease cases compared to 30 active and five non-active Crohn's disease cases in endoscopy. The sensitivity of MRI in detecting active cases of Crohn's disease compared to endoscopy was 83.3% and the specificity of 60%. The strength of agreement between both methods was fair to good (Kappa = 0.347, p-value = 0.4497, Chi-squared = 0.571 with one degree of freedom). Conclusion MRE statistically has a good impact on the assessment of Crohn's disease as well as endoscopy with the parameters used in this study. Non-invasiveness and the changes of activity seen in the bowel proximal to the ileocecal junction undetectable by endoscopy make MRE more practically applicable in this aspect.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Interventional radiology (IR) is a medical specialty that employs imaging techniques such as X-rays, ultrasound, CT scans, and MRI to guide minimally invasive procedures for diagnosing and treating a variety of medical disorders. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the level of IR awareness among medical students at Majmaah University. METHODS: The cross-sectional investigation was carried out among the medical students at Majmaah University in Saudi Arabia. A self-administered questionnaire that had been pretested was used to gather the data. SPSS Statistics (IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) was used to analyze the data. The chi-square test was used to compare qualitative data, and a p-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 202 students who participated in this study, and among them, the majority were males, 126 (62.4%), and the majority of them were pre-clinical students, 105 (52.0%). Knowledge of routinely performed procedures by IR (only by a radiologist) was assessed; 116 (57.4%) of them responded with paracontinuous transluminal coronary angioplasty, 105 (52.0%) with central venous access, and 100 (49.5%) with lower arterial limp percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, which are routinely performed procedures by the radiologists. There was no significant difference in knowledge levels between genders. CONCLUSION: Increasing awareness of IR among medical students is essential to improving patient outcomes and addressing healthcare challenges. Efforts to educate and expand access to IR services must be prioritized to ensure that medical students receive a comprehensive education and that patients receive the highest quality care possible.
