Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect ; 83(3): 332-338, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34303737

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have been unable to identify patient or staff reservoirs for the majority of the nosocomial S. aureus acquisitions which occur in the presence of good infection control practice. We set out to establish the extent to which undetected pre-existing carriage explains apparent nosocomial S. aureus acquisition. METHODS: Over two years elective cardiothoracic admissions were screened for S. aureus carriage before and during hospital admission. Routine screening (nose/groin/wound sampling), was supplemented by sampling additional body sites (axilla/throat/rectum) and culture-based methods optimised to detect fastidious phenotypes (small colony variants, cell wall deficient variants) and molecular identification by PCR. RESULTS: 35% of participants (53/151) were S. aureus carriers according to routine pre-healthcare screening; increasing to 42% (63/151) when additional body sites and enhanced cultures were employed. 71% (5/7) of apparent acquisitions were explained by pre-existing carriage using augmented measures. Enhanced culture identified a minority of colonised individuals (3/151 including 1 MRSA carrier) who were undetected by routine and additional screening cultures. 4/14 (29%) participants who became culture-negative during admission had S. aureus genomic material detected at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional sampling under-estimates carriage of S. aureus and this explains the majority of apparent S. aureus acquisitions among elective cardiothoracic patients.


Assuntos
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Nariz , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/genética
2.
Innovations (Phila) ; 13(1): 23-28, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29462051

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to investigate the long-term survival of patients who underwent single-vessel coronary revascularization with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery with or without hybrid revascularization. The secondary outcome measures were repeat revascularization either by coronary artery bypass grafting or by percutaneous coronary intervention and the incidence of myocardial infarction or recurrent angina. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass procedure in our center between January 2001 and December 2015. Procedures were performed either through small left anterolateral thoracotomy or lower midline sternotomy. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were identified: 100 underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass to the left anterior descending artery and 82 underwent hybrid revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention to coronary arteries other than the left anterior descending artery along with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass to the left anterior descending artery). The mean ± SD age was 62 ± 10.1 years. Preoperatively 82% were male, and 72.5% patients had good left ventricular function. The median follow-up period was 10.9 years. There was no in-hospital or 30-day mortality. The 10-year actuarial survival was 84.8%. Freedom from repeat revascularization was 98.9% at 1 year and 89.9% at 10 years. At follow-up, freedom from myocardial infarction was 96.7% whereas freedom from angina was 92.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations imposed by retrospective analyses, our study demonstrates excellent long-term outcome in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with or without hybrid revascularization. For isolated left anterior descending artery disease minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass should be considered, whereas hybrid revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass) should be considered for multivessel disease.


Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/epidemiologia , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Idoso , Angina Pectoris/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Revascularização Miocárdica/tendências , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esternotomia/métodos , Análise de Sobrevida , Toracotomia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...