Diagnostic Performance of FDG-PET/CT Scan as Compared to US-Guided FNA in Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-d-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/non-contrast CT compared with those of ultrasound (US)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for axillary lymph node (ALN) staging in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/non-contrast CT was performed in 268 women with breast cancer, as well as ALN dissection or sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. One hundred sixty-four patients underwent US-guided FNA in combination with 18F-FDG PET/CT. The diagnostic performance of each modality was evaluated using histopathologic assessments as the reference standard. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were compared to evaluate the diagnostic ability of several imaging modalities. RESULTS: Axillary 18F-FDG uptake was positive in 180 patients, and 125 patients had axillary metastases according to the final pathology obtained by ALN dissection and/or SLN dissection. Of the patients with positive 18F-FDG uptake in the axilla, 21% had false-positive results, whereas 79% were truly positive. Eighty-eight patients had negative 18F-FDG uptake in the axilla, among which 25% were false-negative. 18F-FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 86.59% and a specificity of 63.46% in the assessment of ALN metastasis; on the other hand, US-guided FNA had a sensitivity of 91.67% and a specificity of 87.50%. The mean primary cancer size (p = 0.04) and tumor grade (p = 0.04) in combination were the only factors associated with the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting metastatic ALNs. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of axillary node metastasis in breast cancer patients was not significantly different from that of US-guided FNA. Combining 18F-FDG PET/CT with US-guided FNA or SLN biopsy could improve the diagnostic performance compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT alone.

Safety and efficacy of pazopanib as a second-line treatment and beyond for soft tissue sarcomas: A real-life tertiary-center experience in the MENA region.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcomas are uncommon malignancies. No advances have been recently achieved despite multiple efforts. Pazopanib is a safe and effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in managing soft tissue sarcomas (STS) after chemotherapy failure. However, its use is limited in developing countries and no efficacy data exist from our region. We aimed to study the efficacy of pazopanib in our population, characterized by response rates of patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced STS receiving pazopanib. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity profile. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 15 patients (age≥18 year) diagnosed with advanced STS, refractory to first-line chemotherapy, receiving pazopanib as ≥second-line therapy in one tertiary center in Lebanon were included between January 1st, 2014 and October 31st, 2018. Patient and disease characteristics, disease evaluation, as well as tolerance to treatment, were extracted from charts retrospectively. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 24. RESULTS: The mean age was 48.6 [19-66] years. Eleven patients (73.3%) received pazopanib in second-line, whereas four patients (26.7%) received it in third-line. Thirteen patients (86.7%) progressed, and two patients (13.3%) had stable disease. The median PFS was three months [1-19] and the mean OS was 25.4 months [17.2-33.6]. Five patients required dose-reductions due to poor tolerance. CONCLUSION: Conclusions cannot be drawn due to small patient numbers. However, given the 3-month PFS, 13% of patients maintaining stable disease, and tolerable safety profile, it is reasonable to incorporate pazopanib in STS treatment. More focused studies with larger patient populations need to be done in Lebanon.

Impact of Commercialized Genomic Tests on Adjuvant Treatment Decisions in Early Stage Breast Cancer Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Advances in genomic techniques have been valuable in guiding decisions regarding the treatment of early breast cancer (EBC) patients. These multigene assays include Oncotype DX, Prosigna, and Endopredict. There has generally been a tendency to overtreat or undertreat patients, and having reliable prognostic factors could significantly improve rates of appropriate treatment administration. In this study, we showcase the impact of genomic tests on adjuvant treatment decisions in EBC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study that includes EBC patients treated between December 2016 and February 2018. The physician's choice of treatment was recorded before and after obtaining the results of the genomics tests. Baseline demographics and pathological data were collected from medical records. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients were included. Fifty patients underwent Oncotype DX genomic analysis, 11 patients underwent Prosigna analysis, and 14 patients underwent Endopredict analysis. A total of 21 physicians' plans (28%) were initially undecided and then carried out after obtaining genomic test results. 13 patients were planned to undergo endocrine therapy alone, while 8 were planned to undergo both endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. Treatment was changed in 26 patients (34.67%). The decision to deescalate therapy was taken in 19 patients (25.33%). The decision to escalate treatment was made in 7 patients (9.33%). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the importance of genomics testing, as it assisted physicians in avoiding unnecessary adjuvant chemotherapy in 25.33% of patients, thus reducing side effects of chemotherapy and the financial burden on patients.

Current Status and Future Perspectives of Immunotherapy in Middle-Income Countries: A Single-Center Early Experience.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy agents offer novel treatment options in advanced cancers. However, their use is limited in developing countries lacking unifying guidelines and can be followed by a financial burden. In this study, we aimed to provide an overview regarding the use of immunotherapy and the overall response to treatment in patients with metastatic disease in relation to cost-effectiveness. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving adult metastatic cancer patients, treated with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors at American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC), a tertiary cancer center in Lebanon. Study enrollment began on January 1, 2014 and ended on January 12, 2016. Baseline demographics, epidemiological and clinical data were collected from the patients' records. RESULTS: Our study consisted of 34 patients. Fifteen patients self-financed the treatment. The patients were prescribed immunotherapy without programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing as it was not part of the guidelines at the time. Twenty-two patients were treated with nivolumab and 12 patients with pembrolizumab. Thirteen patients showed partial response or stable disease, while 21 patients showed progression. CONCLUSION: Improvement in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival has been undercut by the lack of availability of these drugs and their cost. Considering that a large percentage of patients do not respond to immunotherapy, there is a need to use guidelines such as a preset PD-L1 level that ensure cost-effectiveness and prevent resource waste.

Fertility in Breast Cancer Survivors in the Middle East: A Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: By the time they complete breast cancer therapy, many young patients are still of childbearing age. We aim to estimate the incidence of pregnancies in women who completed treatment and examine the percentage of patients who received fertility counseling before initiation of therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic health records of breast cancer patients between 2008 and 2014 at AUBMC were screened for exclusion criteria of having metastatic disease or known infertility, still receiving therapy, and being above 42 years at diagnosis. Data about therapy and tumor characteristics was obtained for the included survivors who were interviewed as well via telephone for information about fertility preservation counseling, pregnancy occurrence, and delivery. RESULTS: 451 breast cancer patients were identified. 39 patients remained after application of exclusion criteria. 30.76% (n = 12) wanted more children at the time of diagnosis. 10.25% (n = 4) of all 39 patients treated for breast cancer achieved one or more pregnancy after a median time of 3.83 years after completion of therapy. 25% (n = 3) of women who wanted more children at diagnosis (n = 12) were able to conceive. 23.07% (n = 9) of patients discussed fertility with their primary oncologist prior to treatment initiation. 35.89% (n = 14) of patients were aware of fertility preservation technique availability, but none of these patients used one. CONCLUSIONS: The observed rate of pregnancy is comparable to the literature. There is a lack in fertility counseling of breast cancer patients, and the rate of use of fertility preservation techniques is very low despite prior knowledge about their availability.