RESUMO
Background Most pregnancy-related complications and undesirable outcomes are preventable by effective interventions at a reasonable cost. These interventions are mainly deployed during the antenatal phase and are included under the umbrella of antenatal care (ANC). To our knowledge, no studies have been conducted to assess the adequacy of ANC in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to measure and quantify the adequacy of ANC provided by the Ministry of Health (MoH) facilities in Jeddah and to determine potential factors influencing ANC. Methodology In this cross-sectional study, we used the Adequacy of Perinatal Care Utilization index to measure the adequacy of ANC. Data were collected from September 2023 to March 2024 in two randomly selected MoH hospitals by interviewing mothers and collecting data from medical records. Results A total of 303 mothers participated in this study. Mothers' mean age was 31 years, and 50% of them had received higher school education. Prevalence of adequate ANC was 64.7%. There was a significant association between the adequacy of ANC and mothers' level of education (p < 0.001), time taken to reach the nearest primary care center (p < 0.001), number of total pregnancies (p < 0.034), and the total number prenatal visits (p < 0.001). Conclusions This is the first study to shed light on the prevalence of adequacy of ANC in Saudi Arabia and its associated factors. This study would pave the way to investigate the adequacy of ANC on a national level and will aid policymakers in developing and implementing effective ANC preventive measures, hence helping improve women's health and their babies.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To carry out meta-analysis and systematic review on the association between soft drinks consumption and asthma prevalence among adults and children. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational research. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Scopus, ISI Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched up to December 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included observational studies investigating the association between soft drinks consumption (including maternal consumption during pregnancy) and asthma or wheeze. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted by one author and reviewed independently by two other authors. The most adjusted estimate from each original study was used in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects model. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistic. RESULTS: Of 725 publications originally identified, 19 were included in this systematic review, including 3 cohort studies and 16 cross-sectional studies. Ten articles reported on children up to 18 years, 5 articles on adults (>18 years) and 2 articles on prenatal exposure. In total, 468 836 participants were included, with more than 50 000 asthma cases. Soft drinks consumption was associated with significantly increased odds of asthma in both adults (OR=1.37; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.52) and children (OR=1.14; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.21). Prenatal exposure had marginally statistically significant association (OR=1.11; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.23) with asthma in children. In subgroup analysis for childhood exposure, the association persists for sugar-sweetened soft drinks but not for carbonated drinks. CONCLUSION: Our findings show a positive association between soft drinks consumption and asthma prevalence, mostly from cross-sectional studies. Therefore, more longitudinal research is required to establish causality.
