RESUMO
Venous ulcers are open wounds commonly associated with chronic venous insufficiency. Each patient's healing process is unique, and factors like nutrition and compression therapy can affect it. Compression therapy and optimal nutritional status can assist in improving venous blood circulation, decreasing swelling, and promoting wound healing. This in-depth review looks at all the recent research on how nutrition and compression therapy can help heal venous ulcers, aiming to develop evidence-based guidelines for improving treatment outcomes. The systematic review, registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) and following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) principles, conducted an extensive electronic search in databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus. Using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and different types of studies, the search method focused on studies that directly looked at how nutrition and compression therapy affected the healing of venous ulcers. After deduplicating and screening publications, a collaborative full-text review was conducted to determine their inclusion. As a result, several research studies were chosen for the qualitative synthesis. The authors created a data extraction form to document important variables such as demographics, therapy specifics, and wound features. Several studies on patients with venous ulcers have shown that consuming basic nutrients can improve wound healing. Treatment results differed depending on the types of compression and pressure intensity. Although minimal data indicates the possible benefits of two-layer therapy, a definitive comparison is still uncertain. Further clinical studies are necessary to investigate a wider range of dietary factors and to evaluate different treatments in similar situations.
RESUMO
Background Integrating smartphones into human life has transformed various daily activities. Numerous symptoms, including headaches, have been linked to smartphone use. The excessive use of these devices raises significant health concerns. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between smartphone use and the progression, type, and severity of primary headaches, as well as the necessity for both abortive and prophylactic medications in treating such conditions. Materials and methods In this study, we utilized a cross-sectional survey involving 403 participants aged 14 years and older, all experiencing primary headaches and seeking care at three governmental hospitals in Taif, Saudi Arabia. The participants were divided into two groups based on their smartphone usage: high and low smartphone users. Data were collected through a hospital-based questionnaire administered across the three centers. Descriptive analysis and Pearson chi-square tests were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21 (released 2012; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Results Of the participants, 128 (31.8%) were classified as low users, while 275 (68.2%) were identified as high users. The most frequently reported type of headache was undiagnosed headache, among 109 (27%), followed by migraine, at 86 (21.3%). Headaches were severe in 112 (40.9%) of cases and moderate in 134 (48.9%) of users. Around 62 (72.1%) of participants diagnosed with migraine reported a severe impact on their daily lives. In terms of medication usage, 166 (60.6%) of participants reported consuming zero to five pills monthly, while 52 (19%) reported taking more than 10 pills monthly. Additionally, 58 (21.2%) of participants utilized prophylactic medications. Conclusion No significant association was observed between smartphone use and the impact of headaches. Notably, pain severity was higher among low smartphone users who reported a high intake of medications. Migraine was the most severe and intense headache type. On average, the participants consumed fewer than five pills per month.
