Impact of diabetes mellitus on acute outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic total occlusions: insights from a US multicentre registry.

AIM: To examine the impact of diabetes mellitus on procedural outcomes of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion. METHODS: We assessed the impact of diabetes mellitus on the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion among 1308 people who underwent such procedures at 11 US centres between 2012 and 2015. RESULTS: The participants' mean ± sd age was 66 ± 10 years, 84% of the participants were men and 44.6% had diabetes. As compared with participants without diabetes, participants with diabetes were more likely to have undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery (38 vs 31%; P = 0.006), and to have had previous heart failure (35 vs 22%; P = 0.0001) and peripheral arterial disease (19 vs 13%; P = 0.002). They also had a higher BMI (31 ± 6 kg/m2 vs 29 ± 6 kg/m2 ; P = 0.001), similar Japanese chronic total occlusion scores (2.6 ± 1.2 vs 2.5 ± 1.2; P = 0.82) and similar final successful crossing technique: antegrade wire escalation (46 vs 47%; P = 0.66), retrograde (30 vs 28%; P = 0.66) and antegrade dissection re-entry (24 vs 25%; P = 0.66). Technical (91 vs 90%; P = 0.80) and procedural (89 vs 89%; P = 0.93) success was similar in the two groups, as was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (2.2 vs 2.5%; P = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary cohort of people undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion, nearly one in two (45%) had diabetes mellitus. Procedural success and complication rates were similar in people with and without diabetes.

Predictors of improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction with carvedilol for congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Beta-blocker therapy has been reported to improve survival and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the setting of congestive heart failure (CHF). The magnitude and predictors of improved LVEF are unclear. METHODS: A total of 295 patients were enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria were LVEF <35% at baseline and symptomatic (New York Heart Association class II to IV) CHF despite treatment with at minimum an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Carvedilol was initiated at 3.125 mg twice daily and titrated to a target dose of 25 or 50 mg twice daily, depending on the patient's weight. Paired pretreatment baseline and 9 months with treatment follow-up quantitative LVEFs (assessed by resting radionuclide ventriculograms) were obtained in 161 (55 %) of the patients. RESULTS: LVEF improved from 25% +/- 6% at baseline to 36%+/-12% at follow-up (P<.001). Mean change in LVEF (deltaLVEF) was greater for nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) (+14.5+/-2 LVEF points) than ischemic cardiomyopathy (deltaLVEF +/- 7.6+/-10 EF points, P = .001). The deltaLVEF was > or =21 LVEF points in 30% of the NICM group versus 10% of the ischemic cardiomyopathy group. Conversely, the deltaLVEF was unchanged to minimally improved (< or =5 LVEF points) in 21% of the NICM group versus 52% of the ischemic cardiomyopathy group. Multivariable analysis identified NICM and recent onset of congestive heart failure as correlates of improved LVEF. CONCLUSIONS: Carvedilol significantly improved LVEF, especially in patients with NICM and those with recent onset of CHF.

Combination drug therapy for dyslipidemia.

Effective treatment of dyslipidemia improves prognosis. Statin therapy has been documented to decrease the cardiovascular event rate in the setting of elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels and coronary heart disease, but most patients are not treated to the target (LDL