The longitudinal impact of COVID-19 pandemic on neurosurgical practice.

OBJECTIVE: This observational cross-sectional multicenter study aimed to evaluate the longitudinal impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on neurosurgical practice. METHODS: We included 29 participating neurosurgeons in centers from all geographical regions in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The study period, which was between March 5, 2020 and May 20, 2020, was divided into three equal periods to determine the longitudinal effect of COVID-19 measures on neurosurgical practice over time. RESULTS: During the 11-week study period, 474 neurosurgical interventions were performed. The median number of neurosurgical procedures per day was 5.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.5-8). The number of cases declined from 72 in the first week and plateaued at the 30's range in subsequent weeks. The most and least number of performed procedures were oncology (129 [27.2 %]) and functional procedures (6 [1.3 %]), respectively. Emergency (Priority 1) cases were more frequent than non-urgent (Priority 4) cases (178 [37.6 %] vs. 74 [15.6 %], respectively). In our series, there were three positive COVID-19 cases. There was a significant among-period difference in the length of hospital stay, which dropped from a median stay of 7 days (IQR: 4-18) to 6 (IQR: 3-13) to 5 days (IQR: 2-8). There was no significant among-period difference with respect to institution type, complications, or mortality. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic decreased the number of procedures performed in neurosurgery practice. The load of emergency neurosurgery procedures did not change throughout the three periods, which reflects the need to designate ample resources to cover emergencies. Notably, with strict screening for COVID -19 infections, neurosurgical procedures could be safely performed during the early pandemic phase. We recommend to restart performing neurosurgical procedures once the pandemic gets stabilized to avoid possible post pandemic health-care system intolerable overload.

Neurosurgical Procedures and Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case-Control Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: Quantitative documentation of the effects of outbreaks, including the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, is limited in neurosurgery. Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on neurosurgical practice and to determine whether surgical procedures are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A multicenter case-control study was conducted, involving patients who underwent neurosurgical intervention in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia during 2 periods: pre-COVID-19 and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The surgical intervention data evaluated included diagnostic category, case priority, complications, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 850 procedures were included, 36% during COVID-19. The median number of procedures per day was significantly lower during the COVID-19 period (5.5 cases) than during the pre-COVID-19 period (12 cases; P < 0.0001). Complications, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality did not differ during the pandemic. In a multivariate analysis comparing both periods, case priority levels 1 (immediate) (odds ratio [OR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-2.67), 1 (1-24 h) (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.10-2.41), and 4 (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19-0.42) showed significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: During the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the overall number of neurosurgical procedures declined, but the load of emergency procedures remained the same, thus highlighting the need to allocate sufficient resources for emergencies. More importantly, performing neurosurgical procedures during the pandemic in regions with limited effects of the outbreak on the health care system was safe. Our findings may aid in developing guidelines for acute and long-term care during pandemics in surgical subspecialties.

Expanded transnasal approaches to the skull base in the Middle East: Where do we stand?

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transnasal surgery has gained rapid global acceptance over the last two decades. The growing literature and understanding of anterior skull base endoscopic anatomy, in addition to new dedicated endoscopic instruments and tools, have helped to expand the use of the transnasal route in skull base surgery. OBJECTIVE: Report our early experience in expanded endoscopic transnasal surgery (EETS) and approach to skull base neoplasms. DESIGN: Descriptive, retrospective case series. SETTING: Major tertiary care center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective case review was conducted at King Saud University Medical City between December 2014 and August 2019. Cases with skull base neoplasms that underwent EETS were included. EETS was defined as endoscopic surgical exposure that extended beyond the sellar margins (prechiasmatic sulcus superiorly, clival recess inferiorly, cavernous carotid lines laterally). Routine transsphenoidal pituitary neoplasms, neoplasms of sinonasal origin and meningoencephaloceles were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative clinical assessment, imaging results, surgical approach, and hospital course were all retrieved from the patient electronic charts. Clinical follow-up, perioperative complications, and gross residual tumor rates were documented and reviewed. SAMPLE SIZE AND CHARACTERISTICS: 45 cases of EETS, 13 males and 32 females with mean age of 39.0 (17.7) years (range 2-70 years). RESULTS: The series comprised a wide range of pathologies, including giant pituitary adenoma (8 cases), meningioma (23 cases), craniopharyngioma (4 cases), chordoma (4 cases), optic pathway glioma (2 cases), epidermoid neoplasms (2 cases), astrocytoma (1 case), and teratoma (1 case). For the entire series, gross total resection was achieved in 25/45 operations (55.5%). Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak was the most common complication observed in 9 patients (20%) which were all managed endoscopically. Major vascular complications occurred in 2 patients (4.4%) and are described. Other complications are outlined as well. No mortality was observed. CONCLUSIONS: EETS to the skull base can be done with results comparable to traditional approaches. More work is needed to expand our experience, improve outcomes, and educate the public and medical community in our region about the usefulness of this approach. LIMITATIONS: Sample size and study design. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Maxillary Pneumosinus Dilatans Presenting With Proptosis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Pneumosinus dilatans (PSD) is a rare pathological paranasal sinus expansion. This condition is usually symptomatic or cosmetically apparent, requiring surgical intervention. Multiple hypotheses have been postulated as to the cause of this condition; however, the precise cause and pathogenesis remain obscure. CASE REPORT AND METHODS: An 11-year-old boy presented with right eye bulging and was subsequently found to have PSD of the maxillary sinus. A search was conducted of the PubMed electronic database, using the keywords "pneumosinus dilatans," "pneum(oco)ele," "pneum(oc)ele," "pneum(atoco)ele," and "air cyst." Articles published in English were reviewed. RESULTS: The literature review identified 29 cases of PSD involving the maxillary sinus. The mean age of presentation was 25 years old. Only the right maxillary sinus was affected in 16 cases, followed by the bilateral sinuses in 7 cases and the left sinus in 6 cases. In 5 cases, all paranasal sinuses, along with the maxillary sinus, were expanded. The most common presenting symptom was facial swelling, which was found in 55% of the cases, followed by proptosis and pain. Computed tomography is the gold standard radiological method for diagnosing PSD. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumosinus dilatans is a rare condition that is usually symptomatic and requires surgical intervention. The etiology of the disease is attributed to multiple hypotheses, but more studies are needed to explore this condition further.

Giant Tumefactive Perivascular Spaces: A Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Perivascular spaces (PVS), also known as Virchow-Robin spaces, are pial-lined, interstitial fluid-filled structures in the brain that accompany cerebral vessels as they penetrate the cerebral substance. In healthy individuals, a PVS diameter of <2 mm is considered normal and can typically be seen within the white matter on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). When PVS dilate, they are considered benign lesions and are associated with aging and other risk factors. These dilated PVS can cause neurologic symptoms, depending on their size and location. Symptomatic, massive enlargement of PVS are referred to as "giant" or "tumefactive" PVS; these are extremely rare and require neurosurgical intervention. CASE DESCRIPTION: We present a rare case of giant tumefactive PVS (GTPVS) associated with hydrocephalus in a female patient who presented with progressive headache for 6 months. The patient was found to have giant tumefactive dilatation of PVS involving the right midbrain, with extension to the pons and thalamus, and with supratentorial moderate hydrocephalus. She was treated with cerebrospinal fluid diversion alone. CONCLUSIONS: PVS are found on MRI in healthy people; rarely, they may dilate and cause neurologic symptoms. GTPVS are rare and can be misdiagnosed as central nervous system tumors; however, their imaging characteristics facilitate diagnosis. It has been postulated that these expanding PVS are due to defects in the drainage of interstitial fluid, where it enters into the ventricular system, and they are not the result of increased intraventricular pressure. We hypothesize that this may have been the case for the patient in our study, as the GTPVS collapsed following the insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. However, more recent literature provides evidence to support the idea that hydrocephalus is the consequence, and not the cause, of aqueduct compression by the lesion.

Development of a Saudi Food Frequency Questionnaire and testing its reliability and validity.

OBJECTIVES: To create a food frequency questionnaire specifically designed to capture the dietary habits of Saudis and test its validity and reliability. Methods: This investigation is a longitudinal, test-retest study conducted in King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between December 2015 and March 2016. A list of 140 food items was included in the questionnaire where a closed-ended and open-ended approach was used. Regarding past   year food frequency consumption and 24 hours dietary recall, body weight and height were collected. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, completeness of the food list, and criterion validity were assessed. Results: One-hundred and thirty eight participants were interviewed to complete the 24 hours dietary recall and the constructed questionnaire. Approximately 85% of the food items reported in the dietary recall were covered in the food frequency questionnaire. The association of body mass index with meats (regression coefficients: 2.28) and dairy products consumption frequency was statistically significant (regression coefficients: 2.31). A high overall reproducibility rate of the questionnaire was detected (Pearsons' correlation coefficient: 0.78 p less than 0.001).  Conclusion: The developed questionnaire has a high reliability and reasonable validity, and suitable for use in nutritional epidemiological investigations in Saudi Arabia.

Awake High-Flow Extracranial to Intracranial Bypass for Complex Cerebral Aneurysms: Institutional Clinical Trial Results.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the potential added benefit to patient outcomes of "awake" neurological testing when compared with standard neurophysiologic testing performed under general endotracheal anesthesia. METHODS: Prospective study of 30 consecutive adult patients who underwent awake high flow extracranial to intracranial (HFEC-IC) bypass. Clinical neurological and neurophysiologic findings were recorded. Primary outcome measures were the incidence of stroke/cerebrovascular accident (CVA), length of stay, discharge to rehabilitation, 30-day modified Rankin scale score, and death. An analysis was also performed of a retrospective control cohort (n = 110 patients who underwent HFEC-IC for internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms under standard general endotracheal anesthesia). RESULTS: Five patients (16.6%) developed clinical awake neurological changes (4, contralateral hemiparesis; 1, ipsilateral visual changes) during the 10-minute ICA occlusion test. These patients had 2 kinks in the graft, 1 vasospasm, 1 requiring reconstruction of the distal anastomosis, and 1 developed blurring of vision that reversed after the removal of the distal permanent clip on the ICA. Three of these 5 patients had asynchronous clinical "awake" neurological and neurophysiologic changes. Two patients (7%) developed CVA. Median length of stay was 4 days. Twenty-eight of 30 patients were discharged to home. Median modified Rankin scale score was 1. There were no deaths in this series. Absolute risk reduction in the awake craniotomy group (n = 30) relative to control retrospective group (n = 110) was 7% for CVA, 9% for discharge to rehabilitation, and 10% for graft patency. CONCLUSIONS: Temporary ICA occlusion during HFEC-IC bypass for ICA aneurysms in conjunction with awake intraoperative clinical testing was effective in detecting a subset of patients (n = 3, 10%) in whom neurological deficit was not detected by neurophysiologic monitoring alone.