Utilization of glial fibrillary acidic protein and galectin-3 in the diagnosis of cerebral infarction patients with normal cranial tomography.

OBJECTIVE: It was aimed to determine whether levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and Galectin-3 contribute to the diagnosis of cerebral infarction in clinically suspected ischemic stroke patients with normal computerized cranial tomography (CCT) in the emergency department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, patients above the age of 18 years who presented to emergency department of Firat University between December 2011-November 2012 and were diagnosed with cerebral infarction were included. Exclusion criteria were as follows: symptom onset exceeding 24 hours, trauma, pregnancy, acute myocardial infarction, acute pulmonary embolism, chronic renal insufficiency and steroid therapy. RESULTS: A total of 90 participants, forty patients with ischemic infarction who were diagnosed by CCT and clinical findings (Normal CCT in 17 patients and CCT with an area of infarction in 23 patients) and fifty healthy controls, were included in this study. Compared with the control group, levels of Galectin-3 and GFAP were found to be significantly increased in patients with ischemic infarction (P <0.001 and P = 0.01, respectively). It was found that levels of Galectin-3 and GFAP were significantly increased in ischemic stroke patients with normal CCT compared to the control group (P = 0.04 and P = 0.025, respectively). In ROC curve analysis, we detected %70.59 sensitivity and 70% specificity (AUC = 0.684, P = 0.0213, 95% CI: 0,558-0.792) with a cutoff value of 33.24 ng/ml for GFAP and 76.47% sensitivity and 68% specificity (AUC = 0.734, P = 0.0048, 95% CI: 0.611-0.834) with a cutoff value of 0.84 ng/ml for Galectin-3. No correlation was found between National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and Galectin-3 and GFAP (r = 0.251, P = 0.118 and r = 0.164, P = 0.311, respectively). CONCLUSION: The levels of Galectin-3 and GFAP were increased in acute ischemic stroke patients.

Evaluation of hematological markers in minor head trauma in the emergency room.

INTRODUCTION: A rule exists regarding the use of computed tomography (CT) for patients presenting to the emergency department with head trauma and a Glasgow coma score (GCS) of 15; however, it can be difficult to make this decision due to overcrowded emergency rooms or exaggerated patients complaints. We evaluated patients who presented to the emergency room with minor head trauma, and we aimed to investigate the relationship between brain pathology on CT and hematological markers in order to find markers that help us identify brain pathology in patients with a GCS of 15. METHODS: This retrospective study included 100 patients with pathologies present on their CT scans and a control group consisting of 100 patients with a normal CT. All data obtained from this study were recorded and evaluated using "Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows 20" program. Parametric tests (independent samples test) were used with normally distributed data, while non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U test) were used with non-normally distributed data. A p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. FINDING: When we divided the cases into two groups based on the presence of pathologies on CT scan, we determined that there were significant differences between the groups in terms of white blood cell (WBC), hemoglobin (Hb), mean platelet volume (MPV), neutrophil (neu), troponin T, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR). When differentiating the patients that had brain pathologies on CT scan from patients that had normal CT scans, the troponin T cut-off value of 6.16 lead to 90 % specificity, and setting the NLR cut-off value at 4.29 resulted in a specificity of 90 %. CONCLUSION: MPV, NLR, and troponin T can be used as parameters that indicate brain pathologies on CT scans of patients presenting to the emergency department with isolated minor head trauma and GCS of 15 when the necessity of a CT scan is otherwise unclear.