Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Euro Surveill ; 27(26)2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35775428

RESUMO

Compared with individuals unvaccinated in the current and three previous influenza seasons, in 2021/22, influenza vaccine effectiveness at primary care level was 37% (95% CI: 16 to 52) for current season vaccination, regardless of previous doses, and 35% (95% CI: -3 to 45) for only previous seasons vaccination. Against influenza A(H3N2), estimates were 39% (95% CI: 16 to 55) and 24% (95% CI: -8 to 47) suggesting moderate effectiveness of current season vaccination and possible remaining effect of prior vaccinations.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2 , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estações do Ano , Espanha/epidemiologia , Vacinação
2.
Obesity (Silver Spring) ; 29(1): 29-37, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32885905

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the association between severe obesity and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalization and severe disease. METHODS: The incidence of hospitalization for laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 was evaluated in a prospective population-based cohort of 433,995 persons aged 25 to 79 years in Spain during March and April of 2020. Persons with and without class 3 obesity were compared using Poisson regression to estimate the adjusted relative risk (aRR) from class 3 obesity of COVID-19 hospitalization and of severe disease (intensive care unit admission or death). Differences in the effect by age, sex, and chronic conditions were evaluated. RESULTS: Individuals with class 3 obesity had a higher risk of hospitalization (aRR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.66-2.93) and developing severe COVID-19 (aRR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.20-4.40). In people younger than 50 years, these effects were more pronounced (aRR = 5.02, 95% CI: 3.19-7.90 and aRR = 13.80, 95% CI: 3.11-61.17, respectively), whereas no significant effects were observed in those aged 65 to 79 years (aRR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.70-2.12 and aRR = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.52-3.88, respectively). Sex and chronic conditions did not modify the effect of class 3 obesity in any of the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Severe obesity is a relevant risk factor for COVID-19 hospitalization and severity in young adults, having a magnitude similar to that of aging. Tackling the current obesity pandemic could alleviate the impact of chronic and infectious diseases.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , COVID-19/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Pandemias , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha/epidemiologia
3.
Euro Surveill ; 20(22)2016 Jun 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27277013

RESUMO

We estimated whether previous episodes of influenza and trivalent influenza vaccination prevented laboratory-confirmed influenza in Navarre, Spain, in season 2013/14. Patients with medically-attended influenza-like illness (MA-ILI) in hospitals (n = 645) and primary healthcare (n = 525) were included. We compared 589 influenza cases and 581 negative controls. MA-ILI related to a specific virus subtype in the previous five seasons was defined as a laboratory-confirmed influenza infection with the same virus subtype or MA-ILI during weeks when more than 25% of swabs were positive for this subtype. Persons with previous MA-ILI had 30% (95% confidence interval (CI): -7 to 54) lower risk of MA-ILI, and those with previous MA-ILI related to A(H1N1)pdm09 or A(H3N2) virus, had a, respectively, 63% (95% CI: 16-84) and 65% (95% CI: 13-86) lower risk of new laboratory-confirmed influenza by the same subtype. Overall adjusted vaccine effectiveness in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza was 31% (95% CI: 5-50): 45% (95% CI: 12-65) for A(H1N1)pdm09 and 20% (95% CI: -16 to 44) for A(H3N2). While a previous influenza episode induced high protection only against the same virus subtype, influenza vaccination provided low to moderate protection against all circulating subtypes. Influenza vaccine remains the main preventive option for high-risk populations.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza B/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Potência de Vacina , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/isolamento & purificação , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/isolamento & purificação , Vírus da Influenza B/isolamento & purificação , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Vigilância da População , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estações do Ano , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Espanha/epidemiologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 11(7): 1626-33, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25996366

RESUMO

Studies that have evaluated the influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) to prevent laboratory-confirmed influenza B cases are uncommon, and few have analyzed the effect in preventing hospitalized cases. We have evaluated the influenza VE in preventing outpatient and hospitalized cases with laboratory-confirmed influenza in the 2012-2013 season, which was dominated by a vaccine-matched influenza B virus. In the population covered by the Navarra Health Service, all hospitalized patients with influenza-like illness (ILI) and all ILI patients attended by a sentinel network of general practitioners were swabbed for influenza testing, and all were included in a test-negative case-control analysis. VE was calculated as (1-odds ratio) × 100. Among 744 patients tested, 382 (51%) were positive for influenza virus: 70% for influenza B, 24% for A(H1N1)pdm09, and 5% for A(H3N2). The overall estimate of VE in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza was 63% (95% confidence interval (CI): 34 to 79), 55% (1 to 80) in outpatients and 74% (33 to 90) in hospitalized patients. The VE was 70% (41 to 85) against influenza B and 43% (-45 to 78) against influenza A. The VE against virus B was 87% (52 to 96) in hospitalized patients and 56% in outpatients (-5 to 81). Adjusted comparison of vaccination status between inpatient and outpatient cases with influenza B did not show statistically significant differences (odds ratio: 1.13; p = 0.878). These results suggest a high protective effect of the vaccine in the 2012-2013 season, with no differences found for the effect between outpatient and hospitalized cases.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza B , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Influenza Humana/virologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza B/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza B/patogenicidade , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Estações do Ano , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Espanha/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Potência de Vacina , Adulto Jovem
5.
BMC Public Health ; 13: 191, 2013 Mar 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23496887

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Some studies have evaluated vaccine effectiveness in preventing outpatient influenza while others have analysed its effectiveness in preventing hospitalizations. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the trivalent influenza vaccine in preventing outpatient illness and hospitalizations from laboratory-confirmed influenza in the 2010-2011 season. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study in the population covered by the general practitioner sentinel network for influenza surveillance in Navarre, Spain. Patients with influenza-like illness in hospitals and primary health care were swabbed for influenza testing. Influenza vaccination status and other covariates were obtained from health care databases. Using logistic regression, the vaccination status of laboratory-confirmed influenza cases was compared with that of test-negative controls, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, outpatient visits in the previous 12 months, health care setting, time between symptom onset and swabbing, period and A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination. Effectiveness was calculated as (1-odds ratio)x100. RESULTS: The 303 confirmed influenza cases (88% for A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza) were compared with the 286 influenza test-negative controls. The percentage of persons vaccinated against influenza was 4.3% and 15.7%, respectively (p<0.001). The adjusted estimate of effectiveness was 67% (95% CI: 24%, 86%) for all patients and 64% (95% CI: 8%, 86%) in those with an indication for vaccination (persons age 60 or older or with major chronic conditions). Having received both the 2010-2011 seasonal influenza vaccine and the 2009-2010 pandemic influenza vaccine provided 87% protection (95% CI: 30%, 98%) as compared to those not vaccinated. CONCLUSION: The 2010-2011 seasonal influenza vaccine had a moderate protective effect in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espanha/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
6.
Prev Med ; 55(3): 246-50, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22759626

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyze the factors influencing continued adherence to influenza vaccination in elderly persons vaccinated in the preceding season. METHODS: Using a population-based vaccination registry, we evaluated the proportion of persons vaccinated against influenza in Navarre, Spain, in the 2010-11 season among non-institutionalized persons aged 65 years or over who had been vaccinated in the 2009-10 season. Logistic regression was used to analyze the influence of sociodemographic, clinical and health care factors. RESULTS: Of the 64,245 persons vaccinated against influenza in the 2009-10 season, 87% were vaccinated in the 2010-11 season. Continued adherence to vaccination increased with the number of physician visits per year. It was lower in women, in the 65-69 and ≥ 95 year age-groups, in those hospitalized or diagnosed with any major chronic condition in the previous year, and in persons with hematological cancer or dementia. Health districts and physicians with higher coverage in the previous season continued to have higher adherence in the following season. CONCLUSIONS: People vaccinated against influenza in one season tend to be vaccinated in the following one. Sociodemographic, clinical and health care factors have a moderate effect on the continuity of vaccination, with the most important factor being the treating physician.


Assuntos
Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Sistema de Registros , Espanha
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...