Early stroke following acute myocardial infarction: incidence, predictors and outcome in six Middle-Eastern countries.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stroke is a potential complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim of this study was to identify the incidence, risk factors predisposing to stroke and in-hospital outcome during the index admission with AMI among patients in the Middle East. METHODS: For a period of 6 months in 2006 and 2007, 5,833 consecutive AMI patients were enrolled from 64 hospitals in 6 Middle East countries. RESULTS: The incidence of in-hospital stroke following AMI was 0.85%. Most cases were ST segment elevation AMI-related and ischemic in nature. Patients with in-hospital stroke were older than patients without stroke and were more likely to be female (36 vs. 18.6%, p = 0.0033). They were also more likely to have diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, prior AMI, or percutaneous/surgical coronary revascularization. Patients with stroke were more likely to present with advanced Killip class II-IV, higher mean heart rate and higher serum creatinine. Independent predictors of stroke were age, prior stroke, prior coronary artery bypass surgery, anterior AMI and systolic blood pressure >190 mm Hg on presentation. Early administration of statins was independently associated with reduced stroke risk (odds ratio, OR, 0.4, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.19-0.90, p = 0.025). Stroke was fatal in 44% of the cases and was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 12.5, 95% CI 5.7-27.4, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: There is a low incidence of in-hospital stroke in Middle-Eastern patients presenting with AMI but with very high fatality rates. Early statin therapy was associated with a significant reduction in stroke risk. Future work should be focused on reducing the risk and improving the outcome of this devastating complication.

Blood pressure surge precedes intracerebral hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: Most patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) have very high blood pressure (BP) on presentation, but it is unclear whether such pressure elevation is the cause or a consequence of the ICH. This controversy could be clarified by determining the exact temporal relationship between the BP elevation and the onset of the ICH. Several case reports have attributed ICH to specific situations in which the BP was inferred to be high. Unfortunately, those cases lacked continuous monitoring of BP and neurological exam. METHODS: Single case observation in a University-based tertiary medical center. RESULTS: A neurologically intact 64-year-old woman whose BP and neurological status were monitored during admission to a medical intensive care unit. The patient suddenly developed a decreased level of consciousness and a right hemispheric syndrome 3.5 hours after demonstrating systolic BP values in the range 200 mmHg. An unenhanced computed tomography scan of the brain demonstrated a right ICH. CONCLUSION: In this monitored case, the BP surge clearly preceded the onset of neurological symptoms by 3.5 hours, supporting the view that the acute BP elevation was the cause of ICH.

Continuous or emergent EEG: can bedside caregivers recognize epileptiform discharges?

OBJECTIVE: When emergent or continuous EEG monitoring is carried out to detect subclinical seizures, expert interpretation of the results is usually not immediately available. We assessed the ability to recognize epileptiform discharges among various nonexpert bedside caregivers. A second objective was to determine whether such skill improves with a simple educational intervention. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective cohort study with an educational intervention in a university-based tertiary medical center. PARTICIPANTS: All 125 neurology and neurosurgery residents, intensive care fellows, critical care and neurological floor nurses, and EEG technicians were offered participation. Of these, 50 completed the study and provided 2,398 EEG responses. INTERVENTIONS: A computer-based PowerPoint lecture designed to teach recognition of epileptiform discharges. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: (a) Average number of correct responses in identifying epileptiform discharges in a computer-based pre-test consisting of 24 EEG questions. (b) Impact of the educational intervention as measured by change in the mean average score in a similar post-test. The rate of correct responses by group ranged from 46% for medical critical care nurses to 94% for EEG technicians. Overall mean correct response rate was 14.72 (61%) for the pre-test, and increased to 16.06 (67%) in for post-test (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Recognition of epileptiform discharges by bedside caregivers is disturbingly low. A simple educational intervention only modestly improved such ability. Therefore we should not rely on nontrained personnel to interpret emergent or continuous recordings. EEG technicians are an exception, and their skill could be utilized during emergent studies.