Preprocedural fasting policies for patients receiving tube feeding: A national survey.

BACKGROUND: Patients who are critically ill frequently accrue substantial nutrition deficits due to multiple episodes of prolonged fasting prior to procedures. Existing literature suggests that, for most patients receiving tube feeding, the aspiration risk is low. Yet, national and international guidelines do not address fasting times for tube feeding, promoting uncertainty regarding optimal preprocedural fasting practice. We aimed to characterize current institutional fasting practices in the United States for patients with and without a secure airway, with variable types of enteral access, for representative surgical procedures. METHODS: The survey was distributed to a purposive sample of academic institutions in the United States. Reponses were reported as restrictive (6-8 h preprocedurally) or permissive (<6 h or continued intraprocedurally) feeding policies. Differences between level 1 trauma centers and others, and between burn centers and others, were evaluated. RESULTS: The response rate was 40.3% (56 of 139 institutions). Responses revealed a wide variability with respect to current practices, with more permissive policies reported in patients with secure airways. In patients with a secure airway, Level 1 trauma centers were significantly more likely to have permissive fasting policies for patients undergoing an extremity incision and drainage for each type of feeding tube surveyed. CONCLUSIONS: Current hospital policies for preprocedural fasting in patients receiving tube feeds are conflicting and are frequently more permissive than guidelines for healthy patients receiving oral nutrition. Prospective research is needed to establish the safety and clinical effects of various fasting practices in tube-fed patients.

Association Between Postoperative Delirium and Long-Term Subjective Cognitive Decline in Older Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of the Minimizing Intensive Care Unit Neurological Dysfunction with Dexmedetomidine-Induced Sleep Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate whether a measure of subjective cognitive decline (SCD), the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Applied Cognition-Abilities questionnaire, was associated with postoperative delirium. It was hypothesized that delirium during the surgical hospitalization would be associated with a decrease in subjective cognition up to 6 months after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of data from the Minimizing Intensive Care Unit Neurological Dysfunction with Dexmedetomidine-induced Sleep randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm superiority trial. SETTING: Data from patients recruited between March 2017 and February 2022 at a tertiary medical center in Boston, Massachusetts were analyzed in February 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Data from 337 patients aged 60 years or older who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 30, 90, and 180 days using the subjective PROMIS Applied Cognition-Abilities and telephonic Montreal Cognitive Assessment. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Postoperative delirium occurred within 3 days in 39 participants (11.6%). After adjusting for baseline function, participants who developed postoperative delirium self-reported worse cognitive function (mean difference [MD] -2.64 [95% CI -5.25, -0.04]; p = 0.047) up to 180 days after surgery, as compared with nondelirious patients. This finding was consistent with those obtained from objective t-MoCA assessments (MD -0.77 [95% CI -1.49, -0.04]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of older patients undergoing cardiac surgery, in-hospital delirium was associated with SCD up to 180 days after surgery. This finding suggested that measures of SCD may enable population-level insights into the burden of cognitive decline associated with postoperative delirium.