Quality analysis of the completion of death certificates in Madrid.

The Death Certificate (DC) is an important medical-legal. However, despite its importance, the professionals involved are not well trained and consequently there exist many errors in completion. This situation can cause misclassification in mortality statistics, but also it means that many natural deaths end up being studied by the medical examiner, entailing a waste of resources. An analysis of 1974 DCs in Madrid is carried out to assess the quality of the completion, discover the main errors in the certificates and analyse possible improvement strategies. The study highlights that the demographic and personal information about the deceased is mostly correct; in 16,2 % of the cases the official document was not used; 91 % of the DCs in the sample have a certain degree of error (major or minor); and 38,4 % of the documents chain of causes were incorrect. The main measure proposed is increased training for certifiers, which should begin with activities at undergraduate level and continue later with periodic training workshops. In addition, we consider it essential to digitalise DCs in Spain. This would greatly facilitate completion. It is also proposed that medical examiners use, in Spain, a document similar to the official DC so that the statistics of violent and natural deaths which have required the medical examiners' intervention will improve.

Judicial consequences in Spain for the completion of the medical death certificate.

The completion of the death certificate is indispensable in Spain for a death to be recorded in the civil registry. Occasionally, doctors may be reluctant to sign a death certificate due to possible legal consequences. This study seeks to analyse the possible judicial consequences doctors may face upon filling out this medico-legal document. Sentences published on the Judicial Power's website between 2009 and 2019 containing the term "death certificate" were analysed. From a total of 2100 sentences examined, only 15 were found to contain the term "death certificate" as part of the claim. In only 7 of these cases the claim was made against the physician, and in 5 the physician was found guilty. Three of them concluded falsity via criminal proceedings, one via administrative proceedings for refusing to sign the certificate and one through civil proceedings for filling out an erroneous antecedent cause of death. In view of the above, it can be inferred that the completion of the death certificate poses few judicial consequences for physicians. In addition, this study reveals the importance of the death certificate document as evidence in judicial proceedings.

Decisiones al final de la vida: resultados del cuestionario validado por expertos / End-of-life decisions: results of the expert-validated questionnaire

Objetivo: Examinar los conocimientos y actitudes, en la etapa final de la vida, sobre los cuidados paliativos, el documento de instrucciones previas, los cuidados psicofísicos, el suicidio médicamente asistido y el acompañamiento espiritual. Método: Estudio transversal efectuado en la población usuaria de un centro de salud de atención primaria de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid. Participaron 425 personas seleccionadas mediante un muestreo sistemático aplicado a las hojas de consulta de los/las profesionales sanitarios/as. Se analizaron 42 variables del cuestionario autoadministrado. Resultados: La población madrileña encuestada presentó las siguientes características: estudios superiores 58%, 51-70 años 47%, casados/as 60%, y mujeres 61%. Al 91% les gustaría decidir sobre sus cuidados al final de la vida. El 58% de los/las encuestadas conoce los cuidados paliativos y el 53% solicitaría acompañamiento espiritual. Conocen las instrucciones previas (50%), pero no tienen efectuado el documento. El 54% están a favor de legalizar la eutanasia y el 42% el suicidio asistido. Conclusiones: La población madrileña estudiada decidirá los cuidados al final de la vida y solicitará acompañamiento espiritual. Sobresalen los partidarios de la eutanasia frente al suicidio asistido. Desearían recibir cuidados paliativos y efectuarían las instrucciones previas. Para contrastar la opinión de la población y dar a conocer los recursos sociosanitarios de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid deberían realizarse encuestas en diferentes áreas sanitarias de atención primaria

Objective: To assess the attitudes and knowledge in the life's end about palliative care, advance directives, psychological-physical care, medically assisted suicide and spiritual accompaniment. Method: A cross-sectional study performed in the population at primary health care center of the Autonomous Region of Madrid (Spain). It participated 425 selected people that a simple random was applied in the consultation sheets of health professionals. They analyzed 42 variables of self-administered questionnaire. Results: The surveyed population of Madrid displayed the following characteristics: university studies 58%, 51-70 years 47%, married 60%, and women 61%. 91% would like to decide about their care at life's end. 58% of respondents are aware of palliative care and 53% would request spiritual accompaniment. They know advance directives (50%) but have not made the document. 54% are in favor of legalizing the euthanasia and 42% the assisted suicide. Conclusion: Madrid's people state they would like to decide what care they will receive at life's end and request spiritual accompaniment. Outstanding advocates of euthanasia against assisted suicide. They would like to receive palliative care and complete advance directives documents. To draw comparisons within the population, thereby increasing awareness about social health care resources in Autonomous Region of Madrid, surveys should be conducted in different primary health care centers areas of Madrid

Tipologías de los madrileños ante la etapa final de la vida mediante un análisis de clusters / Typologies of Madrid's citizens (Spain) at the end-of-life: cluster analysis

Objetivo: Establecer tipologías de la población general madrileña ante el final de la vida, mediante un análisis de clusters. Método: A la muestra (N = 425), perteneciente a un centro de salud de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid, se le aplicó el programa SPAD 8. Se efectuó una técnica de análisis de correspondencias múltiples, seguida de un análisis de conglomerados para lograr un dendograma jerárquico ascendente. Previamente se realizó un estudio transversal con los resultados de un cuestionario. Resultados: Se identificaron cinco clusters. Cluster 1: grupo que no respondió a numerosas preguntas del cuestionario (5%). Cluster 2: partidarios de recibir cuidados paliativos y de la eutanasia (40%). Cluster 3: se oponen al suicidio asistido y no solicitarían ayuda espiritual (15%). Cluster 4: partidarios de recibir cuidados paliativos y del suicidio asistido (16%). Cluster 5: contrarios al suicidio asistido y solicitarían ayuda espiritual (24%). Conclusiones: Sobresalieron estos cuatro clusters. Los clusters 2 y 4 eran partidarios de recibir cuidados paliativos, la eutanasia (2) y el suicidio asistido (4). Los clusters 4 y 5 practicaban mucho sus creencias y sus familiares no habían recibido cuidados paliativos. Por el contrario, los clusters 3 y 5 se oponían a la eutanasia y mayormente al suicidio asistido. Apenas practicaban sus creencias los clusters 2 y 3. Los clusters 2, 4 y 5 no efectuaron el documento de instrucciones previas. Este estudio se podría tener en cuenta para elegir los cuidados que mejoren la calidad del final de la vida

Objective: To establish typologies within Madrid's citizens (Spain) with regard to end-of-life by cluster analysis. Method: The SPAD 8 programme was implemented in a sample from a health care centre in the autonomous region of Madrid (Spain). A multiple correspondence analysis technique was used, followed by a cluster analysis to create a dendrogram. A cross-sectional study was made beforehand with the results of the questionnaire. Results: Five clusters stand out. Cluster 1: a group who preferred not to answer numerous questions (5%). Cluster 2: in favour of receiving palliative care and euthanasia (40%). Cluster 3: would oppose assisted suicide and would not ask for spiritual assistance (15%). Cluster 4: would like to receive palliative care and assisted suicide (16%). Cluster 5: would oppose assisted suicide and would ask for spiritual assistance (24%). Conclusions: The following four clusters stood out. Clusters 2 and 4 would like to receive palliative care, euthanasia (2) and assisted suicide (4). Clusters 4 and 5 regularly practiced their faith and their family members did not receive palliative care. Clusters 3 and 5 would be opposed to euthanasia and assisted suicide in particular. Clusters 2, 4 and 5 had not completed an advance directive document (2, 4 and 5). Clusters 2 and 3 seldom practiced their faith. This study could be taken into consideration to improve the quality of end-of-life care choices

Elaboración de un cuestionario sobre conocimientos y actitudes de la población madrileña frente al final de la vida / Design of a questionnaire on the knowledge and attitudes of the population of Madrid (Spain) facing the end-of-life

Objetivo: Elaborar y validar un cuestionario sobre los conocimientos y las actitudes de la población general en la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (España) ante la fase final de la vida. Método: Diseño de un cuestionario estructurado y autoadministrado, validado por un grupo de siete expertos/as profesionales de la Sanidad Madrileña. Valorado mediante una prueba piloto en atención primaria. Resultados: El cuestionario final constaba de 42 preguntas divididas en seis módulos: 1) decisiones y cuidados psicofísicos al final de la vida; 2) cuidados paliativos; 3) eutanasia y suicidio asistido; 4) documento de instrucciones previas; 5) dimensión espiritual; y 6) datos sociodemográficos. Conclusiones: El cuestionario ha resultado un método indirecto útil para conocer la opinión sobre el final de la vida en la población de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid. Si fuera aplicado en atención primaria y hospitalaria podrían establecerse comparaciones entre los usuarios de distintas comunidades autónomas

Objective: To create and validate a questionnaire about knowledge and attitudes of the general population in Madrid (Spain) about life's end stage. Method: A descriptive study designed as a structured self-administered questionnaire, validated by seven Madrid Health Service professional experts and assessed through a pilot study. Results: The questionnaire consisted of 42 questions, divided into six modules: 1) decisions and psychological-physical care at life's end; 2) palliative care; 3) euthanasia and assisted suicide; 4) advance directives document; 5) spiritual factors; and 6) socio-demographic data. Conclusions: The questionnaire was a useful, indirect method to ascertain the opinion of life's end in the Autonomous Region of Madrid. If it were applied in primary health care and hospital care, comparisons could be made among users in different autonomous regions of Spain

[Typologies of Madrid's citizens (Spain) at the end-of-life: cluster analysis]. / Tipologías de los madrileños ante la etapa final de la vida mediante un análisis de clusters.

OBJECTIVE: To establish typologies within Madrid's citizens (Spain) with regard to end-of-life by cluster analysis. METHOD: The SPAD 8 programme was implemented in a sample from a health care centre in the autonomous region of Madrid (Spain). A multiple correspondence analysis technique was used, followed by a cluster analysis to create a dendrogram. A cross-sectional study was made beforehand with the results of the questionnaire. RESULTS: Five clusters stand out. Cluster 1: a group who preferred not to answer numerous questions (5%). Cluster 2: in favour of receiving palliative care and euthanasia (40%). Cluster 3: would oppose assisted suicide and would not ask for spiritual assistance (15%). Cluster 4: would like to receive palliative care and assisted suicide (16%). Cluster 5: would oppose assisted suicide and would ask for spiritual assistance (24%). CONCLUSIONS: The following four clusters stood out. Clusters 2 and 4 would like to receive palliative care, euthanasia (2) and assisted suicide (4). Clusters 4 and 5 regularly practiced their faith and their family members did not receive palliative care. Clusters 3 and 5 would be opposed to euthanasia and assisted suicide in particular. Clusters 2, 4 and 5 had not completed an advance directive document (2, 4 and 5). Clusters 2 and 3 seldom practiced their faith. This study could be taken into consideration to improve the quality of end-of-life care choices.

[End-of-life decisions: results of the expert-validated questionnaire]. / Decisiones al final de la vida: resultados del cuestionario validado por expertos.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitudes and knowledge in the life's end about palliative care, advance directives, psychological-physical care, medically assisted suicide and spiritual accompaniment. METHOD: A cross-sectional study performed in the population at primary health care center of the Autonomous Region of Madrid (Spain). It participated 425 selected people that a simple random was applied in the consultation sheets of health professionals. They analyzed 42 variables of self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: The surveyed population of Madrid displayed the following characteristics: university studies 58%, 51-70 years 47%, married 60%, and women 61%. 91% would like to decide about their care at life's end. 58% of respondents are aware of palliative care and 53% would request spiritual accompaniment. They know advance directives (50%) but have not made the document. 54% are in favor of legalizing the euthanasia and 42% the assisted suicide. CONCLUSION: Madrid's people state they would like to decide what care they will receive at life's end and request spiritual accompaniment. Outstanding advocates of euthanasia against assisted suicide. They would like to receive palliative care and complete advance directives documents. To draw comparisons within the population, thereby increasing awareness about social health care resources in Autonomous Region of Madrid, surveys should be conducted in different primary health care centers areas of Madrid.

[Design of a questionnaire on the knowledge and attitudes of the population of Madrid (Spain) facing the end-of-life]. / Elaboración de un cuestionario sobre conocimientos y actitudes de la población madrileña frente al final de la vida.

OBJECTIVE: To create and validate a questionnaire about knowledge and attitudes of the general population in Madrid (Spain) about life's end stage. METHOD: A descriptive study designed as a structured self-administered questionnaire, validated by seven Madrid Health Service professional experts and assessed through a pilot study. RESULTS: The questionnaire consisted of 42 questions, divided into six modules: 1) decisions and psychological-physical care at life's end; 2) palliative care; 3) euthanasia and assisted suicide; 4) advance directives document; 5) spiritual factors; and 6) socio-demographic data. CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire was a useful, indirect method to ascertain the opinion of life's end in the Autonomous Region of Madrid. If it were applied in primary health care and hospital care, comparisons could be made among users in different autonomous regions of Spain.

Analysis of 415 adverse events in dental practice in Spain from 2000 to 2010

INTRODUCTION: The effort to increase patient safety has become one of the main focal points of all health care professions, despite the fact that, in the field of dentistry, initiatives have come late and been less ambitious. The main objective of patient safety is to avoid preventable adverse events to the greatest extent possible and to limit the negative consequences of those which are unpreventable. Therefore, it is essential to ascertain what adverse events occur in each dental care activity in order to study them in-depth and propose measures for prevention. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the characteristics of the adverse events which originate from dental care, to classify them in accordance with type and origin, to determine their causes and consequences, and to detect the factors which facilitated their occurrence. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This study includes the general data from the series of adverse dental vents of the Spanish Observatory for Dental Patient Safety (OESPO) after the study and analysis of 4,149 legal claims (both in and out of court) based on dental malpractice from the years of 2000 to 2010 in Spain. RESULTS: Implant treatments, endodontics and oral surgery display the highest frequencies of adverse events in this series (25.5%, 20.7% and 20.4% respectively). Likewise, according to the results, up to 44.3% of the adverse events which took place were due to predictable and preventable errors and complications. CONCLUSION: A very significant percentage were due to foreseeable and preventable errors and complications that should not have occurred

Analysis of 415 adverse events in dental practice in Spain from 2000 to 2010.

INTRODUCTION: The effort to increase patient safety has become one of the main focal points of all health care professions, despite the fact that, in the field of dentistry, initiatives have come late and been less ambitious. The main objective of patient safety is to avoid preventable adverse events to the greatest extent possible and to limit the negative consequences of those which are unpreventable. Therefore, it is essential to ascertain what adverse events occur in each dental care activity in order to study them in-depth and propose measures for prevention. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the characteristics of the adverse events which originate from dental care, to classify them in accordance with type and origin, to determine their causes and consequences, and to detect the factors which facilitated their occurrence. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This study includes the general data from the series of adverse dental vents of the Spanish Observatory for Dental Patient Safety (OESPO) after the study and analysis of 4,149 legal claims (both in and out of court) based on dental malpractice from the years of 2000 to 2010 in Spain. RESULTS: Implant treatments, endodontics and oral surgery display the highest frequencies of adverse events in this series (25.5%, 20.7% and 20.4% respectively). Likewise, according to the results, up to 44.3% of the adverse events which took place were due to predictable and preventable errors and complications. CONCLUSION: A very significant percentage were due to foreseeable and preventable errors and complications that should not have occurred.

The clinical safety of disabled patients: Proposal for a methodology for analysis of health care risks and specific measures for improvement

The clinical risks associated with health care have been a known factor since ancient times, and their prevention has constituted one of the foundations of health care. However, concern for the risks involved in health care treatments has risen very significantly in recent years, becoming a modern current of concern for clinical health care risks which is referred to by the name of “patient safety” in the scientific literature. Unfortunately, there are no studies on patient safety in dental practice or case studies of adverse events in this practice. In addition to the lack of studies on adverse events in regular dental practice, there are even fewer references to treatment for disabled patients. In this article, we provide a “proposal for analysis” of the clinical risks associated with treating disabled patients, which will make it possible to evaluate the health care risks associated with the treatment of patients who have a specific disability, at one determined moment and in one specific environment (AU)

The clinical safety of disabled patients: proposal for a methodology for analysis of health care risks and specific measures for improvement.

The clinical risks associated with health care have been a known factor since ancient times, and their prevention has constituted one of the foundations of health care. However, concern for the risks involved in health care treatments has risen very significantly in recent years, becoming a modern current of concern for clinical health care risks which is referred to by the name of "patient safety" in the scientific literature. Unfortunately, there are no studies on patient safety in dental practice or case studies of adverse events in this practice. In addition to the lack of studies on adverse events in regular dental practice, there are even fewer references to treatment for disabled patients. In this article, we provide a "proposal for analysis" of the clinical risks associated with treating disabled patients, which will make it possible to evaluate the health care risks associated with the treatment of patients who have a specific disability, at one determined moment and in one specific environment.