Usability of shear wave elastography to predict the success of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: prospective pilot study.

The present study is intended to investigate the usability of shear wave elastography (SWE) in predicting the success of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) used in kidney stone treatment. ESWL was performed on a total number of 52 patients diagnosed with kidney stones between May 2019 and July 2020. The presence of a residual stone greater than 4 mm was accepted as failure. The patients were divided into two groups as ESWL success and ESWL failure. SWE and Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements of stones were performed in all patients before ESWL. The two groups were compared in terms of age, gender, stone localisation, stone size, body mass index (BMI), skin-to-stone distance, HU, and SWE values of the stones. ESWL was successful in 30 of the 52 patients included in the study, while it failed in 22 of them. While the mean SWE value was 7.3 (7.9 ± 2.2) kPa in patients with success in ESWL, it was 14.6 (17.9 ± 10.2) kPa in those with failed ESWL. The mean HU was 883.5 (841.4 ± 191.1) in patients with success in ESWL and 1078 (1115.5 ± 183) in those with failed ESWL. Both SWE and HU values of the stones were found to be statistically significantly lower in the successful group (p < 0.05). It was seen that SWE and HU values were correlated to each other. The groups of successful and failed ESWL did not differ significantly in terms of age, gender distribution, stone size, BMI, and skin-to-stone distance (p > 0.05). With SWE, the hardness of the stone can be measured and its suitability for ESWL can be evaluated. It can be used as an alternative parameter to HU before ESWL treatment, since it has a lower cost compared to computed tomography (CT) and does not contain radiation.

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Different Temperature Irrigation and Effects on Surgical Complications and Anesthesiology Applications.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a widely accepted and frequently performed operation for large kidney stones. However, there is not much information about the effects of irrigation fluid temperature as well as many other factors that affect success and complications during the operation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the surgical and anesthesiological effects of irrigation fluid used in body temperature and room temperature during and after PCNL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 108 PCNL patients were performed between June 2016 and April 2018. The half of these patients (54) were performed with body temperature (37°C) irrigation fluid, hence known as body temperature group (BTG), and the other half with room temperature (22°C) irrigation fluid, called as room temperature group (RTG). For the study, we recorded the body temperature of the patients during and after the operation, the amount of irrigation fluid used, the size and location of the kidney stones, the duration of the operation, postoperative shivering time during the patient's wake-up period, pre- and postoperative hemoglobin value, additional blood requirements, postoperative analgesic requirements, and postoperative urinary tract infections. RESULTS: The age of patients, gender distribution, height, weight, body mass index, stone size, and postoperative analgesic requirement showed no significant differences in two groups. The postoperative body heat was significantly higher in the BTG than the RTG. The duration of waking was significantly higher in the RTG than the BTG. The amount of hemorrhage was significantly less in the patients who were irrigated in the RTG. CONCLUSION: The temperature of the irrigation fluid can affect many parameters in the PCNL. We recommend using irrigation in room temperature especially with patients having bleeding risks and irrigation fluid in body temperature especially with patients having anesthetic risks for easier waking process.