Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Head Neck ; 43(11): 3476-3492, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34499392

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Given recent increase in prevalence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) and advances in surgical capabilities, we sought to determine whether a change in frequency of surgery-based treatment for locally advanced OPSCC has occurred. METHODS: Patients with T3-T4b OPSCC in the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2010 to 2016 were categorized as receiving primary surgery or radiation-based therapy and stratified by human papillomavirus (HPV) status. Trends in treatment selection and factors associated with treatment type were examined. RESULTS: 6566 patients with HPV-positive were included, of whom 489 (7.45%) received surgery and 4698 patients with HPV-negative, of whom 362 (7.71%) received surgery. The percentage of patients treated with surgery decreased from 11.8% to 5.9% for HPV-positive disease and from 9.8% to 6.3% for HPV-negative disease. Factors associated with surgery included younger age, health insurance, and treatment at academic centers. CONCLUSIONS: In HPV-positive and HPV-negative disease, the percentage of locally advanced OPSCC undergoing surgery-based therapy has decreased.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Humanos , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/cirurgia , Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço
2.
Head Neck ; 42(7): 1448-1453, 2020 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32357380

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has raised controversies regarding safe and effective care of patients with head and neck cancer. It is unknown how much the pandemic has changed surgeon practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to head and neck surgeons assessing opinions related to treatment and concerns for the safety of patients, self, family, and staff. RESULTS: A total of 88 head and neck surgeons responded during the study period. Surgeons continued to recommend primary surgical treatment for oral cavity cancers. Respondents were more likely to consider nonsurgical therapy for patients with early glottic cancers and HPV-mediated oropharynx cancer. Surgeons were least likely to be concerned for their own health and safety and had the greatest concern for their resident trainees. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights differences in the willingness of head and neck surgeons to delay surgery or alter plans during times when hospital resources are scarce and risk is high.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Oncologia Cirúrgica/organização & administração , Inquéritos e Questionários , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/epidemiologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Masculino , Saúde Ocupacional , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Segurança do Paciente , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Gestão de Riscos , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
3.
Oral Oncol ; 66: 9-13, 2017 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28249654

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Management of cervical unknown primary squamous cell carcinoma (CUP) has evolved with the introduction of transoral robotic surgery (TORS). OBJECTIVES: 1. To describe the efficacy of TORS lingual and palatine tonsillectomy in identifying the primary site of malignancy. 2. To explore how the extent of surgery affects diagnostic yield. 3. To report margin status of TORS resections. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective, single-center cohort study utilizing a prospectively collected database of CUP patients in a high-volume tertiary referral center. Patient underwent operative laryngoscopy plus TORS as clinically indicated. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end point was successful identification of the primary. The extent of surgery and margin status were also examined. RESULTS: From 2010-2016, 64 patients with CUP were treated. The primary tumor was found in 51 patients (80%). Fourteen patients (22%) were identified with operative laryngoscopy alone. Fifty patients underwent TORS lingual tonsillectomy ± palatine tonsillectomy with 37 primary tumors identified (74%). The primary was located in the lingual tonsil in 32 patients (86%) and palatine tonsil in 5 patients (10%, p<0.001). Negative margins were achieved in 19 patients (51%). The deep margin was the most commonly positive margin (47%, p=0.049). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Operative laryngoscopy with TORS is efficacious, localizing the primary in 80% of patients. If a margin was positive, it was most commonly the deep margin. This study provides valuable information that can help standardize surgical technique, further increasing the diagnostic yield and decreasing the negative margin rate of TORS for CUP.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Pescoço , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...