La configuración de los tornillos en la osteosíntesis de las fracturas del cuello femoral no influye en los resultados funcionales ni mecánicos / The configuration of the screws in the osteosynthesis of fractures of the femoral neck does not influence the functional or mechanical outcomes

Antecedentes y objetivo: La síntesis con tornillos canulados es uno de los métodos aceptados en las fracturas de cuello femoral, aunque su óptima disposición es un tema en continuo debate. El objetivo principal fue comparar los resultados del paciente con fractura de cuello de fémur fijada con tres tornillos en configuración triangular y en triángulo invertido en el plano frontal. Materiales y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo y comparativo de 53 pacientes con fractura de cuello femoral intervenidos entre 2015 y 2022 mediante fijación con tres tornillos canulados: 22 conformados en triángulo (grupo triángulo) y 31 en triángulo invertido (grupo triángulo invertido). Se evaluó la funcionalidad mediante la escala modificada de Merlé d’Aubigné, la capacidad para la deambulación con la escala de Koval, así como las complicaciones postoperatorias. Resultados: En la escala de Merlé d’Aubigné la puntuación media fue de 16,7 en el grupo triángulo y de 16,1 en el grupo triángulo invertido (p=0,259). En la escala de Koval se observó una disminución significativa, pasando de 1,6 de media preoperatoria a 2,2 tras la cirugía (p=0,000), no hallando diferencias entre grupos. Hubo seis complicaciones postoperatorias en el grupo triángulo y tres en el grupo triángulo invertido (p=0,140). Conclusión: La configuración de los tornillos en el cuello femoral, tanto en forma de triángulo como en triángulo invertido, no influyó en los resultados funcionales ni mecánicos de los pacientes con fractura de cuello de fémur fijada mediante tres tornillos canulados.(AU)

Background and objective: Synthesis with cannulated screws is one of the accepted methods in femoral neck fractures, although its optimal configuration is a subject in continuous debate. The main objective was to compare the results of the patient with a femoral neck fracture fixed with three screws in triangle and inverted triangle configuration in the frontal plane. Materials and methods: Retrospective and comparative study of 53 patients with femoral neck fracture, operated between 2015 and 2022 with fixation with three cannulated screws, 22 with a triangle configuration (triangle group) and 31 in an inverted triangle (inverted triangle group). Functionality was evaluated using the modified Merlé d’Aubigné scale, walking ability using the Koval scale, as well as postoperative complications. Results: On the Merlé d’Aubigné scale, the mean score was 16.7 in the triangle group and 16.1 in the inverted triangle group (P=.259). On the Koval scale, a significant decrease was observed, going from 1.6 preoperative mean to 2.2 after surgery (P=.000), finding no differences between groups. There were six postoperative complications in the triangle group and three in the inverted triangle group (P=.140). Conclusion: The configuration of the screws in the femoral neck, both in the form of a triangle and an inverted triangle, did not influence the functional or mechanical outcomes of the patients with a femoral neck fracture fixed with three cannulated screws.(AU)

[Translated article] The configuration of the screws in the osteosynthesis of fractures of the femoral neck does not influence the functional or mechanical outcomes / La configuración de los tornillos en la osteosíntesis de las fracturas del cuello femoral no influye en los resultados funcionales ni mecánicos

Antecedentes y objetivo: La síntesis con tornillos canulados es uno de los métodos aceptados en las fracturas de cuello femoral, aunque su óptima disposición es un tema en continuo debate. El objetivo principal fue comparar los resultados del paciente con fractura de cuello de fémur fijada con tres tornillos en configuración triangular y en triángulo invertido en el plano frontal. Materiales y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo y comparativo de 53 pacientes con fractura de cuello femoral intervenidos entre 2015 y 2022 mediante fijación con tres tornillos canulados: 22 conformados en triángulo (grupo triángulo) y 31 en triángulo invertido (grupo triángulo invertido). Se evaluó la funcionalidad mediante la escala modificada de Merlé d’Aubigné, la capacidad para la deambulación con la escala de Koval, así como las complicaciones postoperatorias. Resultados: En la escala de Merlé d’Aubigné la puntuación media fue de 16,7 en el grupo triángulo y de 16,1 en el grupo triángulo invertido (p=0,259). En la escala de Koval se observó una disminución significativa, pasando de 1,6 de media preoperatoria a 2,2 tras la cirugía (p=0,000), no hallando diferencias entre grupos. Hubo seis complicaciones postoperatorias en el grupo triángulo y tres en el grupo triángulo invertido (p=0,140). Conclusión: La configuración de los tornillos en el cuello femoral, tanto en forma de triángulo como en triángulo invertido, no influyó en los resultados funcionales ni mecánicos de los pacientes con fractura de cuello de fémur fijada mediante tres tornillos canulados.(AU)

Background and objective: Synthesis with cannulated screws is one of the accepted methods in femoral neck fractures, although its optimal configuration is a subject in continuous debate. The main objective was to compare the results of the patient with a femoral neck fracture fixed with three screws in triangle and inverted triangle configuration in the frontal plane. Materials and methods: Retrospective and comparative study of 53 patients with femoral neck fracture, operated between 2015 and 2022 with fixation with three cannulated screws, 22 with a triangle configuration (triangle group) and 31 in an inverted triangle (inverted triangle group). Functionality was evaluated using the modified Merlé d’Aubigné scale, walking ability using the Koval scale, as well as postoperative complications. Results: On the Merlé d’Aubigné scale, the mean score was 16.7 in the triangle group and 16.1 in the inverted triangle group (P=.259). On the Koval scale, a significant decrease was observed, going from 1.6 preoperative mean to 2.2 after surgery (P=.000), finding no differences between groups. There were six postoperative complications in the triangle group and three in the inverted triangle group (P=.140). Conclusion: The configuration of the screws in the femoral neck, both in the form of a triangle and an inverted triangle, did not influence the functional or mechanical outcomes of the patients with a femoral neck fracture fixed with three cannulated screws.(AU)

The configuration of the screws in the osteosynthesis of fractures of the femoral neck does not influence the functional or mechanical outcomes. / La configuración de los tornillos en la osteosíntesis de las fracturas del cuello femoral no influye en los resultados funcionales ni mecánicos.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Synthesis with cannulated screws is one of the accepted methods in femoral neck fractures, although its optimal configuration is a subject in continuous debate. The main objective was to compare the results of the patient with a femoral neck fracture fixed with three screws in triangle and inverted triangle configuration in the frontal plane. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective and comparative study of 53 patients with femoral neck fracture, operated between 2015 and 2022 with fixation with three cannulated screws, 22 with a triangle configuration (triangle group) and 31 in an inverted triangle (inverted triangle group). Functionality was evaluated using the modified Merlé d'Aubigné scale, walking ability using the Koval scale, as well as postoperative complications. RESULTS: On the Merlé d'Aubigné scale, the mean score was 16.7 in the triangle group and 16.1 in the inverted triangle group (P=.259). On the Koval scale, a significant decrease was observed, going from 1.6 preoperative mean to 2.2 after surgery (P=.000), finding no differences between groups. There were six postoperative complications in the triangle group and three in the inverted triangle group (P=.140). CONCLUSION: The configuration of the screws in the femoral neck, both in the form of a triangle and an inverted triangle, did not influence the functional or mechanical outcomes of the patients with a femoral neck fracture fixed with three cannulated screws.

[Translated article] The configuration of the screws in the osteosynthesis of fractures of the femoral neck does not influence the functional or mechanical outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Synthesis with cannulated screws is one of the accepted methods in femoral neck fractures, although its optimal configuration is a subject in continuous debate. The main objective was to compare the results of the patient with a femoral neck fracture fixed with three screws in triangle and inverted triangle configuration in the frontal plane. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective and comparative study of 53 patients with femoral neck fracture, operated between 2015 and 2022 with fixation with three cannulated screws, 22 with a triangle configuration (triangle group) and 31 in an inverted triangle (inverted triangle group). Functionality was evaluated using the modified Merlé d'Aubigné scale, walking ability using the Koval scale, as well as postoperative complications. RESULTS: On the Merlé d'Aubigné scale, the mean score was 16.7 in the triangle group and 16.1 in the inverted triangle group (p=.259). On the Koval scale, a significant decrease was observed, going from 1.6 preoperative mean to 2.2 after surgery (p=.000), finding no differences between groups. There were six postoperative complications in the triangle group and three in the inverted triangle group (p=.140). CONCLUSION: The configuration of the screws in the femoral neck, both in the form of a triangle and an inverted triangle, did not influence the functional or mechanical outcomes of the patients with a femoral neck fracture fixed with three cannulated screws.