Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Palliat Med ; 24(1): 116-121, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33146569

RESUMO

Palliative care (PC) providers often face challenging and emotional cases while operating in the structures that are not ideally resourced. This combination can lead to burnout and further jeopardize resources from turnover, morale, and decreased productivity. Although many wellness efforts have focused on building personal resilience skills for individuals, programmatic approaches to improve a culture wellness are equally important in supporting clinical teams. This article brings together the perspectives of PC leaders with expertise in wellness to collate practical pearls for interventions that impact the culture of well-being in their organizations. In this article, we use a "Top 10" format to highlight the interventions that PC leaders can implement to support the well-being of clinical staff and promote program sustainability.


Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional , Enfermagem de Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida , Esgotamento Profissional/prevenção & controle , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde
2.
N C Med J ; 79(4): 256-258, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29991621

RESUMO

The use of team-based models of care is widely regarded as a mechanism for enhancing the delivery of high-quality care, especially at the end of life. Active collaboration to promote effective coordination and delivery of person-centered care is an integral part of the team-based model that is the focus of this article.


Assuntos
Modelos Organizacionais , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Assistência Terminal/organização & administração , Humanos , North Carolina , Estados Unidos
3.
Psychooncology ; 14(8): 647-60, 2005 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15580617

RESUMO

Many patients play an active role in determining their cancer treatments, and the communication of medical information influences patient decision-making. This study examined participants' preferences between various methods of communicating quantitative risks and benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy. Using clinical vignettes, participants were first asked to decide whether or not to endorse chemotherapy and were subsequently asked about their preferences for the methods used to communicate the risks and benefits. Participants preferred the absolute survival benefit method over negatively framed methods, such as relative or absolute risk reduction. We also present analysis of qualitative data which supports the conclusions drawn from quantitative analyses. In summary, the absolute survival benefit was shown to be the superior method of communicating quantitative risks and benefits of chemotherapy. Failure to use clear and concise methods of communicating quantitative risk and benefit information may compromise efforts to obtain informed consent for treatment.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Comportamento de Escolha , Comunicação , Revelação , Relações Médico-Paciente , Adulto , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Comportamento de Redução do Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...