Improving the quality of care for adolescents and young adults on an adult medical ward.

BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults have health needs that are distinctly different from children and adults. A lack of education and training is reported by clinicians to be one of the main barriers to providing comprehensive developmentally appropriate care to young people, including the provision of confidential healthcare and taking a holistic approach. AIM: This study documents the current provision of care to young people on an adult inpatient medical ward at a large tertiary teaching hospital in Auckland. METHODS: Forty-three staff and 40 patients aged 16-24 years on an adult medical ward completed surveys, which were based on the Northern Regional Alliance, Northern Regional Youth Health Network Standards for Quality Care for Adolescents and Young Adults in Secondary or Tertiary Care. RESULTS: Few (12%) staff had completed any specific training in looking after adolescent and young adult patients. Confidentiality was not routinely discussed with young people by 50% of clinicians, and only 23% of staff reported that they see a young person alone as part of their consultation or admission. Less than half of young people reported receiving a comprehensive psychosocial assessment that included sexual health, mental health and suicide, and safety. CONCLUSIONS: Key components of comprehensive developmentally appropriate healthcare were not regularly carried out by staff on an adult medical ward. These findings suggest that further education and training, and service improvements are needed in tertiary adult hospital settings.

GP treatment decisions for patients with depression: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: GPs are prescribing more antidepressants than previously, but not in accordance with guidelines. The reasons why they prescribe are not well understood. AIM: To explore associations between GP treatment and severity of depression, patients' life difficulties, previous history of illness and treatment, and patient attitudes. DESIGN: Observational study in two phases, 3 years apart. SETTING: Seven practices in Southampton, UK. METHOD: Adult attenders who consented were screened for depression in the waiting room. After the consultation, the 17 participating GPs completed questionnaires on the perceived presence and severity of depression, patients' life difficulties, previous problems and treatment, patient attitudes towards antidepressants, and their treatment decisions. Patients returned postal questionnaires on sociodemographics, life events, physical health, and attitudes towards antidepressants. RESULTS: Of 694 patients screened in the two phases, the GPs rated 101 (15%) as depressed, acknowledged depression in 44 cases (6%), and offered treatment in 27 (4%), including antidepressants in 14 (2%). Offers of antidepressants were more likely in both phases where the GPs rated the depression as moderate rather than mild, and where they perceived a positive patient attitude to antidepressants. However, GP ratings of severity did not agree well with the validated screening instrument, and their assessments of patients' attitudes to treatment were only moderately related to patients' self-reports. CONCLUSIONS: In line with current guidelines, GPs base prescribing decisions on the perceived severity of depression, taking patients' preferences into account, but they do not accurately identify which patients are likely to benefit from treatment. Better ways to assess depression severity and patient attitudes towards antidepressants are needed in order to target treatment more appropriately.