A Case of Multilevel Aortic Disease Treated Using Cardiatis Multilayer Flow Modulator.

A recent systematic review and meta-analysis shows that synchronous and metachronous thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms are present in 19.2% of cases. The management remains controversial: elective simultaneous TEVAR and EVAR could increase morbidity due to increased aortic coverage during a single procedure, longer operative times, increased blood loss, and greater contrast exposure. Conversely, simultaneous thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and endovascular aneurysms repair (EVAR) prevent the need for two interventions, reduces future access site complications, and obviates interval aortic complications. We present a case of a multilevel aortic disease treated in three stages: EVAR, TEVAR, and exclusion of an increasing aortic visceral penetrating aortic ulcer through a multilayer flow modulator endograft with an optimal result.

Stent-Graft Relining Using the Altura Endograft for Type Ia and IIIb Endoleaks after Kissing Iliac Arteries Stent.

A 79 years old man, affected by serious comorbidities, occurred to the Emergency Room of our Hospital complaining abdominal pain. He was previously submitted to kissing iliac arteries stent for iliac aneurysms. An urgent CT scan showed a type Ia and a type IIIb endoleaks with left common iliac artery enlargement, occlusion of both hypogastric arteries and inferior mesenteric artery, and a severe stenosis of the right iliac external artery. We opted for a relining with a two-piece D-shaped Altura endograft for the aorta, with bilateral iliac components, landing at the level of the external iliac arteries. Postoperative course was uneventful with no endoleak or endograft migration on CT scan control at 6 months.

A Case of Late Type Ia Endoleak After Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing Using the Nellix System: Proximal Extension with Triple Chimney and Gutter Endoleak Embolization.

An 87-year-old man, who submitted to endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) on 2017, presented a type Ia endoleak 2 years later, with enlargement of the aneurysmal sac. We planned an endovascular procedure of correction consisting of a proximal extension through two covered stent grafts deployed into the previous Nellix stent grafts, with associated triple chimney. However, 3 months later, he had a further 5 mm aneurysmal sac enlargement. He was submitted to angiography with coil embolization of gutters, obtaining a successfully result. At 1 and 3 months, he is free from endoleak, with a stable aneurysmal diameter.

Jetstream Atherectomy System for Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: A Single Center Experience and Mid-term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess our experience and mid-term outcomes using Jetstream atherectomy system for treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease (FPAD). METHODS: Data of 30 patients with FPAD treated at our center between 2013 and 2016 were analyzed. Two subgroups of patients were identified: Group A included patients (n = 18) with de novo lesions; Group B (n = 12) included those with in-stent restenosis. The primary study end points assessed were technical success, perioperative mortality, and major adverse event (MAE) rate at 30 days (distal embolization, major amputation, and target lesion revascularization). Other outcomes measured were survival, primary, and secondary patency, and freedom from amputation at 1 and 3 years of follow-up, respectively. RESULTS: Technical success was 100% for both groups. The MAE rate was 8.7%. No distal filter was adopted during intervention. Angioplasty was associated with 93.3% of cases (93.3% vs. 100%; P = 0.15), drug-eluting balloon (DEB) in 12 cases (22.2% vs. 66.6%; P = 0.008), drug-eluting stent and bare metal implantation in 1 (5.6% vs. 0%; P = 1) and 4 cases (11.1% vs. 16.7%; P = 1), respectively. The cumulative primary and secondary patency rates were 75.1% and 95.5% at 1 year, and 70.4% and 84.8% at 3 years of follow-up, respectively. The survival and freedom from amputation were 96.4% and 85.8% at 1 and 3 years of follow-up, respectively. The freedom from target lesion revascularization was 91.7% and 83.4% at 1 and 3 years from intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Jetstream appears to be safe and feasible with no distal embolization and low rate perioperative complications. Moreover, encouraging outcomes were observed when atherectomy was associated to DEB angioplasty.

Outcomes of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in narrow aortic bifurcations using the ultra-low profile "INCRAFT" device: A retrospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: Although the long-term results of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with low-profile devices in patients with hostile iliac anatomies have been published, there are no reported results specifically for narrow aortic bifurcations (NAB). This study investigated the outcomes of EVAR with the INCRAFT device in NAB (<16 mm). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study involved five vascular surgery centers. From November 2014 until June 2018, 127 patients were treated with the INCRAFT device. The patient population was divided into two groups based on aortic bifurcation diameter. They were designated as the (1) standard aortic bifurcation (SAB) group (>16 mm) and the (2) the NAB group (<16 mm). Primary end points were the differences between the two groups in terms of technical success, survival at 30 days, iliac limb patency, and reinterventions. RESULTS: The SAB group included 96 patients and the NAB group included 31 patients. The mean aortic bifurcation diameter was 25.5 mm in the SAB group and 13.2 mm in the NAB group. It is noteworthy that, in the NAB group, 21.8% of patients had aortic bifurcations with focal calcific lesions (less than one-third of the circumferential length of the bifurcation) and 48.3% showed extensive calcifications (two-thirds of the circumferential length of the bifurcation), for 29.9% of the patients in the NAB group the aortic bifurcation had a circumferential highly calcific lesion (complete occlusion of the circumferential length of the bifurcation). Technical success was 98.9% in the SAB group and 96.7% in the NAB group (P = .1). The need for iliac component stenting was not significantly different between the groups (SAB 2.0% vs NAB 3.2%; P = .07). The 1-year survival was 97.9% and 96.7% in the SAB and NAB groups, respectively, with no aneurysm-related mortality. The mean follow-up was 18.4 months and 15.3 months in the SAB and NAB groups, respectively. The iliac primary patency was 98.9 % in the SAB group and 96.8% in the NAB group (P = .088), and the primary assisted patency was 100% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR with INCRAFT in NABs showed acceptable results. In this multicenter study, the results were comparable in terms of technical success and iliac patency rate between patients with SABs and NABs.

"Over-SIRIX": A New Method for Sizing Aortic Endografts in Combination with the Chimney Grafts: Early Experience with Aortic Arch Disease.

BACKGROUND: Large gutters after chimney procedures are one of the main causes of type I endoleak (EL-I). This study aims to evaluate a new tailored planning named "Over-SIRIX," based on Osirix Imaging Software, to choose the correct main graft oversizing in order to minimize EL-I incidence. METHODS: From 2008 to 2015, 34 patients were treated with parallel grafts for aortic arch diseases at our institution. The study included 22 patients with single stent and antegrade flow configuration; they were divided into 2 groups (PRE- and POST-"Over-SIRIX"). "Over-SIRIX" was carried out in the retrospective group (PRE-"Over-SIRIX"), and it was used to plan the endovascular procedure in the prospective group (POST-"Over-SIRIX"). Through the multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) of the preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA), the proximal neck of the chimney grafts was studied. Stent and endograft configurations were drawn in order to minimize the "gutters." To obtain the ideal main graft sizing (I-Size), a formula was used by adding the custom sizing (C-Size) to the disease oversizing (D-Over). The same MPR imaging was evaluated on postoperative CTA to study gutters area and presence of EL-I. RESULTS: The mean I-Size was 41.67 mm that was equivalent to an ideal oversizing of 19.3% (range 10-28%). The gutters area decreased from 7.3 to 1.7 mm2 (PRE/POST) and EL-I rate from 28.5% to 0% (PRE/POST). Gutters area bigger than 7.5 mm2 and planning made without "Over-SIRIX" were significantly associated (P < 0.05) to EL-I. CONCLUSIONS: "Over-SIRIX" appears to be a feasible method to customize planning during chimney technique, reducing the risk of EL-I which is significantly related to the presence and size of the gutters.

Endovascular management of total juxtarenal aortic occlusive disease in high-risk patients: technical considerations and clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND: To report our single-center experience in the endovascular treatment of juxtarenal aorto-iliac occlusions. METHODS: Between December 2008 and December 2012, 13 patients with total juxtarenal aorto-iliac occlusion, considered at high risk for open revascularization, were treated by endovascular means at our Department. Inclusion criteria were severe intermittent claudication, rest pain and distal tissue loss. Antegrade recanalization from percutaneous brachial access and retrograde angioplasty and stenting from percutaneous or surgical femoral accesses were performed. The renal arteries (RAs) were protected using filters or balloons. Aorto-iliac bare-metal stents were deployed in all patients. RESULTS: No death was registered. Technical success was 100%. In 11 patients (84.6%) the Ankle-Brachial Index increased to 0.9-1. Renal arteries were involved in 7 cases (53.8%): 3 chimney stent grafts deployment, 2 aorto-iliac stent fenestrations and 2 aorto-iliac stents placement above the renal arteries without renal function impairment. Complication rate was 38.5%: 2 cases of thrombus dislodgement into the RAs, 1 distal artery embolization, 1 common iliac artery rupture and 1 pseudo-aneurysm. All complications were treated percutaneously, except for the distal embolization treated surgically. The patient with iliac artery rupture underwent acute renal insufficiency requiring temporary dialysis after hemorrhagic shock because of retroperitoneal hematoma. Mean follow-up was 18 months (range 6-30 months). The primary and secondary patency was respectively 92.3% and 100%. CONCLUSION: Endovascular recanalization of juxtarenal aorto-iliac occlusion in selected patients is feasible and safe, with good early and mid-term results and should be considered in high risk patients.

Towards an entirely endovascular aortic world: an update of techniques and outcomes for endovascular and open treatment of type I, II, and III endoleaks.

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is largely the most adopted strategy for aneurysmal disease of the aorta. Nevertheless, the high incidence of reintervention makes it difficult to identify EVAR as a definitive solution; in particular, the most frequent indication of reintervention is endoleak, which is defined as persistent flow into the aneurysmal sac from different sources. Several treatment strategies are described. A contemporary literature search was performed with the intent of describing techniques and outcomes of endovascular and open strategies to type I, II, and III endoleak. Described techniques and outcomes were organized by indication (type I, II, and III endoleak) and by type of approach (endovascular, open, and laparoscopic) to give an overview of the current status of the treatment for the three most frequent types of endoleak. Several endovascular means are described in the literature for the treatment of endoleak.

Outcomes of 1000 Carotid Wallstent Implantations: Single-Center Experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of carotid artery stenting (CAS) with Wallstents in a single-center experience. METHODS: From January 2003 to December 2013, 1000 carotid artery lesions were treated with Carotid Wallstents under cerebral protection in 877 patients (mean age 71.7 ± 8 years; 621 men). Indications for treatment were de novo lesions (>70% asymptomatic and >60% symptomatic); stenoses following carotid endarterectomy, radiation, or neck surgery; contralateral laryngeal nerve palsy; and high surgical risk. All the patients underwent duplex ultrasound and clinical evaluation during follow-up; radiography was performed when fracture or stent migration was suggested by ultrasound. RESULTS: Procedure success was achieved in 99.3% of patients. Major and minor 30-day adverse events occurred in 2.1% of patients, including stroke (1.8%: 1.3% minor, 0.5% major), myocardial infarction (0.1%), and death (0.2%). Plaque morphology, nature of stenosis, and symptomatic status were significantly associated with the risk of postoperative neurologic events. Restenosis occurred in 3.2% at a mean 45.5-month follow-up and was significantly associated with diabetes, smoking, symptomatic stenosis, de novo stenosis, and calcification (plaque III/IV). No fracture or migration was registered during follow-up. CONCLUSION: CAS is a valid method for treating carotid artery disease, with very low rates of major adverse events and neurologic complications. The Carotid Wallstent seems to have excellent results, even with complex plaque morphology, and a low incidence of restenosis at follow-up.

The "Open Branch" Technique: A New Way to Prevent Paraplegia After Total Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm.

INTRODUCTION: Staged endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) has been proved to be an effective strategy to reduce the risk of spinal cord ischemia (SCI). Several techniques have been described: some imply the staged coverage of the aorta, other the temporarily perfusion of the sac through a branch left unstented or a dedicated branch that will be occluded later. The aim of those is to facilitate the expansion of the collateral network that perfuses the spinal cord. However, each of them, have some disadvantages such as the need of two interventions of big magnitude and the risk of target vessel occlusion or endograft displacement. We describe a new technique to treat TAAA in a staged manner. TECHNIQUE: The first step of our technique is the thoracoabdominal endograft deployment with the branching of all target vessels; one of these is branched with a bare stent inside which a covered stent will be placed in a second step, which can be perfomed under local anesthesia. We named this technique "open branch" (OB). Before insertion of the covered stent, a balloon is inflated inside the bare stent to simulate the complete sac exclusion to evaluate eventual neurological complication. RESULTS: Two patients with Crawford type II TAAA and one with a suprarenal aneurysm following the open repair of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm were treated. No cases of SCI were observed after the two procedures. Median interval time between the two procedures was 8, 6 weeks (4-16). Between the two steps, no aneurysm growth or rupture and no branch occlusion or endograft displacement was observed. CONCLUSIONS: These three cases of "OB" technique show that this is a safe and feasible alternative strategy to treat TAAA in a staged manner.

Surgical conversion with graft salvage as a definitive treatment for persistent type II endoleak causing sac enlargement.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to present open surgical conversion with graft salvage or "semiconversion" as a definitive and safe treatment for untreatable and persistent type II endoleaks causing sac enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair. METHODS: Between January 2001 and December 2014, 25 of 1623 endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) patients were selected as candidates for open semiconversion. The indication was persistent type II endoleak in 13 patients (12 of whom received previous attempts of embolization), type I and II endoleak in 2 patients, and sac growth without imaging evidence of endoleak in the other 10. After the infrarenal aorta was prepared (via a retroperitoneal access, whenever possible), the technique consisted of performing a banding of the neck with Teflon (DuPont, Wilmington, Del), a sacotomy to remove the thrombus or the hygroma, or both, and then suturing all of the feeding vessels that were found. Proximal and distal fenestrations were performed to avoid sac repressurization. RESULTS: The semiconversion was performed after a mean of 74 months after the initial EVAR. The mean aneurysm size at the time of the EVAR was 6.0 cm (range, 5.0-9.5 cm), and the mean aneurysm size at the time of the semiconversion was 7.7 cm (range, 5.5-11.5 cm). The overall aneurysm size increase was 38%, and the average growth rate was 8.2% per year. One patient had a stable aneurysm size but was treated because of an emergency condition. Technical success was 100%, with resolution of the endoleak and no perioperative deaths. Four cardiac deaths were registered at 12, 26, 30, and 60 months (mean follow-up, 42 months; range, 1-80 months). CONCLUSIONS: Graft salvage appears to be a valid option compared with open repair when considering treatment of persistent type II endoleak. This case series shows that semiconversion is a safe and effective treatment for otherwise untreatable type II endoleak.

Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Repair in the Endovascular Era: Fourteen-Years Single Center Experience.

To compare outcomes of popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) repair by endovascular treatment, great saphenous vein (GSV) bypass, and prosthetic bypass.Single center retrospective analysis of patients presenting PAA from 2000 to 2013. Patients were divided into endovascular treatment (group A); GSV bypass (group B); and prosthetic graft bypass (group C). Outcomes were technical success, perioperative mortality, and morbidity. Survival, primary and secondary patency, and freedom from reintervention rate were estimated. Differences in ankle-brachial index (ABI), in-hospital length of stay (InH-Los), red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and limb loss were reported. Mean follow-up was 49 (median: 35; 1-145; SD 42) months.Sixty-seven patients were included; 25 in group A, 28 in group B, and 14 in group C. PAA was symptomatic in 23 (34%) cases. Technical success was 100%. No perioperative death occurred. Three (4.5%) perioperative complications were reported with no significant difference between groups (P = 0.866). Five-years estimated survival was 78%. Estimated 5-years primary patency for groups A, B, and C was 71%, 81%, and 69%, respectively (P = 0.19). Estimated 5-years secondary patency for groups A, B, and C was 88%, 85%, and 84% (P = 0.85). Estimated 5-years freedom from reintervention for groups A, B, and C was 62%, 84%, and 70%, respectively (P = 0.16). A significant difference between preoperative ABI versus postoperative ABI was observed (P = 0.001). InH-LoS was significantly shorter in group A (P < 0.001). RBC transfusions were required significantly less in group A when compared to group C (P = 0.045). Overall limb salvage was achieved in all but 1 patient.PAA repair has good early and long-term outcomes with different treatment options. Endovascular treatment was not inferior to surgical repair with a reduced InH-LoS and RBC transfusion. It can be successfully employed even in nonelective setting. A randomized controlled trial with long-term follow-up and appropriate patient inclusion criteria is necessary to compare these 3 treatment options.

Endovascular treatment options for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.

PURPOSE: To report short-term and midterm outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of complex aneurysms requiring revascularization of visceral arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective data were collected from patients deemed unsuitable for conventional EVAR and conventional surgery who were treated with different endovascular approaches according to the clinical presentation of the aneurysm. Custom-made fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (CM f-EVAR) was used in the elective setting, homemade fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (HM f-EVAR) or HM f-EVAR combined with chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (ch-EVAR) was used in the emergent setting in patients with hemodynamic stability, and ch-EVAR was used in unstable cases. The study included 34 consecutive patients. Primary outcomes measured were perioperative mortality and morbidity, renal function impairment (RFI), target vessel patency, and survival at mean follow-up. RESULTS: In the CM f-EVAR group (7 of 34 patients; 20.6%), an intraoperative type III endoleak (1 of 7 patients; 14%) sealed spontaneously. At 8.9 months of follow-up, 1 (1 of 7 patients; 14%) death and 1 (1 of 7 patients; 14%) episode of transient RFI were documented. Visceral vessel patency rate was 95.2%. In the HM f-EVAR group (4 of 34 patients; 11.7%) and the combination of HM f-EVAR and ch-EVAR group (3 of 34 patients; 8.8%), no complications were observed at 17.3 months of follow-up. In the ch-EVAR group (20 of 34 patients; 58.8%), visceral patency was 95% at 30.9 months of follow-up. Two cases of transient RFI and 2 cases of permanent RFI were registered (2 of 20 patients; 10%). One asymptomatic renal artery branch occlusion was observed at 11 months of follow-up. No endoleaks were documented. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular aneurysm repair techniques including CM f-EVAR, HM f-EVAR or HM f-EVAR in combination with ch-EVAR, and ch-EVAR are valid tools to maintain blood flow in visceral arteries during treatment of complex aortic aneurysms. The proposed interventional protocol based on clinical presentation was feasible in all cases.

Ten years' experience in endovascular repair of popliteal artery aneurysm using the Viabahn endoprosthesis: a report from two Italian vascular centers.

BACKGROUND: Although rare, popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) are the most commonly observed peripheral arterial aneurysms. Surgical repair is considered the gold standard, even if with debated results. The aim of our study is to evaluate the outcome of endovascular treatment of PAAs using the Viabahn peripheral endograft (W. L. Gore and Associates, Inc., Flagstaff, AZ) in 2 high-volume Italian centers. METHODS: All consecutive PAA patients treated by endovascular procedures between January 2004 and December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. True atherosclerotic aneurysms, symptomatic and asymptomatic, were included in the analysis. All patients were treated by high-skilled vascular surgeons. The outcome measures were graft thrombosis, reintervention rate, and limb salvage at early and long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Fifty-three PAAs were treated. Patients were more frequently male (98.1%) with a mean age of 73.6 ± 7.8 years. Twelve patients (22.6%) were symptomatic and in 8 of them a local fibrinolysis was required before definitive surgery. Mean PAA diameter was 30.9 ± 10.9 mm (range 17-60). Fifty-two patients (98.1%) had at least 1 patent runoff vessel. Technical success was achieved in all patients. Overall, 80 stent grafts were deployed and in 21 patients (39.6%) more than 1 stent graft was deployed. In-hospital mortality rate and 30-day reinterventions were null. At a mean follow-up of 37.4 ± 29.3 months, primary patency, secondary patency, and limb salvage were respectively 73.6%, 92.4%, and 100%. CONCLUSION: In our limited, retrospective experience, the endovascular treatment of PAA by Viabahn stent graft allowed satisfactory technical and clinical results even at long-term follow-up.

Chimney technique for aortic arch pathologies: an 11-year single-center experience.

PURPOSE: To report our single-center experience with the chimney technique for aortic arch pathologies and the mid- to long-term results in these patients. METHODS: From June 2002 to May 2013, 26 patients (18 men; mean age 71.2 years, 53-86) underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) combined with chimney technique. Indications for treatment were: a proximal landing zone <15 mm long distal to the left subclavian artery (LSA), thoracic aortic aneurysm (n=13), complicated type B aortic dissection (n=10), type I endoleak after previous TEVAR (n=2), and penetrating aortic ulcer (n=1). Treatment was performed in the emergency setting in 7 cases. The 28 chimney stent-grafts (double chimneys in 2 patients) were deployed in the innominate artery (n=7), left common carotid artery (n=10), and LSA (n=11). All patients underwent computed tomography before discharge, at 1, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Technical success was 100%. One (3.8%) perioperative death was due to a cerebral hemorrhage. No major stroke was registered, but 3 (11.5%) minor strokes occurred (all resolved). Paraparesis developed in 2 (7.7%) patients. Median follow-up was 36.8 months (range 1-131), during which an additional 4 (15.4%) patients died, but only 1 death was aneurysm-related. Chimney graft patency was 89.3% (25/28); an asymptomatic fracture was found in a patent chimney stent-graft at the 18-month follow-up. The type I endoleak rate was 23% (n=6); 3 endoleaks associated with aneurysm sac enlargement were treated. CONCLUSION: The chimney technique for aortic arch pathologies is safe and feasible and may be an option in patients considered at high risk for surgery or who are ineligible for conventional TEVAR, especially in the emergency setting. Concern persists regarding type I endoleak, and long-term follow-up remains mandatory.

Extracranial internal carotid artery aneurysm presenting as pharyngeal mass with dysphagia.

Aneurysms of the extracranial portion of the internal carotid artery are rare. Generally, they occur just at the level of, or above, the bifurcation. Here we report a case of a left internal carotid artery aneurysm presenting as an oropharyngeal mass causing dysphagia.

[Surgical treatment of extracranial carotid aneurysms]. / Il trattamento chirurgico degli aneurismi delle arterie carotidi extracraniche.

The incidence of aneurysm ranges from 0.1 to 3.7 of all carotid artery diseases requiring surgery. The aim of the study was to describe our personal experience with the surgical therapy of aneurysms of the carotid artery. Over the period from 1980 to 2000 we observed 19 aneurysms of the extracranial carotid tract in 17 patients. Eleven patients were subjected to surgical treatment (M/F: 2:1; mean age: 59 years). The sizes of the lesion ranged from 2 to 5.5 cm. The locations of the lesions were: common carotid 5; internal carotid 4; bifurcation 4. A shunt was utilised in one patient. No mortality was recorded. In 2 patients there was a transitory central neurological deficit, and in 4 patients a transitory peripheral neurological deficit. A definitive peripheral deficit was recorded in one patient (9%). The authors recommend prompt surgical treatment, in view of the low morbidity and almost total absence of mortality.