Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 133(1): 107-9, 2010 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20023265

RESUMO

We compared 3 rapid assays for Clostridium difficile with a cell culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA). Of 600 stool samples, 46 were positive for toxigenic C difficile. Both rapid common antigen assays were highly sensitive (91.3%-100%) and, therefore, were appropriate screening tests. The rapid toxin assay had poor sensitivity (61%) but excellent specificity (99.3%). Testing stools for glutamate dehydrogenase (step 1) and those positive with a rapid toxin assay (step 2) would correctly classify 81% of submitted specimens within 2 hours, including during periods of limited staffing (evenings, nights, and weekends). CCNA could then be used as a third step to test rapid toxin-negative samples, thereby providing a final result for the remaining 19% of samples by 48 to 72 hours. The use of rapid assays as outlined could enhance timely diagnosis of C difficile.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Bactérias/análise , Proteínas de Bactérias/análise , Toxinas Bacterianas/análise , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Enterotoxinas/análise , Fezes/microbiologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/imunologia , Toxinas Bacterianas/imunologia , Células Cultivadas , Enterotoxinas/imunologia , Fezes/enzimologia , Fibroblastos/citologia , Fibroblastos/microbiologia , Prepúcio do Pênis/citologia , Prepúcio do Pênis/microbiologia , Glutamato Desidrogenase/análise , Glutamato Desidrogenase/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Neutralização/métodos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...