Prevalence of and factors associated with burnout in pediatric urology fellows.

INTRODUCTION: The 2016 AUA census found 39% of practicing urologists experienced burnout. Burnout is a syndrome of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and decreased feelings of personal accomplishment due to workplace stress. Despite the demands of training, little is known about the prevalence of burnout in pediatric urology fellows. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of burnout in pediatric urology fellows and factors associated with higher levels of burnout. STUDY DESIGN: The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and an anonymous survey of personal and training characteristics were distributed electronically to pediatric urology fellows in April 2023. The MBI is a standardized and validated 22-item questionnaire used to quantify burnout and is comprised of three subscales: Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalization (DP), and Personal Accomplishment (PA). As per prior literature, higher scores in EE (>27) or DP (>10) were defined as high burnout. Demographic and training characteristics were compared between fellows with high and low to moderate levels of burnout with t tests and Fischer's exact tests. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 85% (29/34); 48% clinical fellows, 52% research fellows. Mean age of respondents was 31.4 years (SD 2.6), 59% female, 70% married, and 37% a parent. Mean scores for EE, DP, and PA were 15 (SD 10.2), 4 (SD 4.0), and 39 (SD 10.3), respectively, with no significant difference between year in fellowship. Nineteen percent of fellows met criteria for high burnout and 41% met criteria for moderate to high burnout based on EE or DP scores. Factors significantly associated with high burnout included number nights of call per month and number of projects required to complete in fellowship. Strategies fellows used most to combat burnout included quality time with family and friends, sleep, exercise, and watching TV/movies. DISCUSSION: Nearly 20% of pediatric urology fellows scored for high levels of burnout and over 40% scored for moderate to high levels of burnout. There appears to be an association with increased call and project workload requirements with increased levels of burnout, and efforts to combat burnout could specifically address these factors. Fellows with more children at home had lower levels of burnout, and many trainees described quality time with family and friends as their preferred strategy to prevent burnout. CONCLUSION: This survey-based study identifies risk factors for burnout in pediatric urology fellows. Fellows can use the information presented to consider personalized strategies to prevent burnout through training and into their careers.

Standardization of the management of pediatric urolithiasis in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of urolithiasis in the pediatric population is rising and medical expulsive therapy (MET) using alpha-adrenergic antagonists has been found to be effective in aiding in the passage of ureteral stones in children. A prior review of patients presenting to our quaternary children's hospital with urolithiasis found only 54 % were prescribed MET and these patients had increased rates of spontaneous stone passage. Thus, an ED urolithiasis management protocol was created to standardize evaluation and care of children with suspected urolithiasis. OBJECTIVE: To compare management of children with urolithiasis presenting to the ED before and after urolithiasis management protocol implementation. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients with urolithiasis who presented to our children's ED from 2011 to 2022. The primary outcome was rate of MET prescribing before and after pathway implementation in July 2017, thus the pre-implementation group comprises patients who presented to the ED from July 2011 to July 2017, and the post-protocol group includes those who presented from August 2017 to April 2022. Secondary outcomes included CT utilization in the ED, surgical intervention rate, proportion with spontaneous stone passage, and frequency of urology consultation. Two-sample t-test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the outcomes of interest before and after protocol implementation. RESULTS: Of 337 patients who presented to the ED after protocol implementation, 120 met inclusion criteria. When comparing outcomes before and after implementation of the protocol, there was significantly decreased use of CT scans (79 % vs 50 %, p < 0.0001) and increased prescribing of MET (54 % vs 82 %, p < 0.0001). There was a significant decrease in opioids prescribed (44 % vs 26.7 %, p = 0.0040), and an increased rate of spontaneous stone passage (34 % vs 46 %, p = 0.0483). Lastly, there was a significant reduction in the rate of surgery for stone management after the implementation of protocol (35 % vs 17 %, p = 0.0020) DISCUSSION: As the ED is the primary site of presentation for many children with urolithiasis, standardization of evaluation and management provides an opportunity to improve outcomes in this population. We found that implementation of an ED urolithiasis management protocol was associated with decreased use of CT scans, decreased opioid prescribing, increased spontaneous stone passage, and decreased rate of surgical management for children with ureteral stones. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the positive impact of standardizing care for children presenting to the ED with urolithiasis.