Transesophageal echocardiography in an emergency setting. A district general hospital experience.

Transesophageal echocardiography is an extremely useful technique for the study of various cardiovascular pathologies. In the particular setting of emergency, it is of great value for prompt diagnosis and appropriate therapy. It was our aim to evaluate, in our hospital, the benefits obtained by the use of transesophageal echocardiography in an emergency setting. We retrospectively studied patients who underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in an emergency setting, from June 1997 to December 2002, evaluating demographic characteristics, indication to perform TEE, benefit obtained (diagnosis or exclusion of initial diagnosis), and technique-related complications. There were 97 transesophageal echocardiograms performed in an emergency setting in the period under consideration, accounting for 19.3% of the total number of exams. Fifty-two patients (53.6%) were male, mean age 63.9 +/- 12.7. Nineteen patients (19.6%) were on assisted ventilation. The indications to perform TEE were: possible massive or submassive pulmonary thromboembolism in 32 patients (33.0%); suspected aortic dissection in 19 (19.6%); shock with inconclusive transthoracic echocardiogram in ten (10.3%); possible endocarditis in eight (8.2%); possible prosthetic valve dysfunction in seven (7.2%); intracardiac mass in six (6.2%); search for cardiac source of embolism in five (5.2%); possible mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction in four (4.1%); pre-electrical cardioversion study in four patients with atrial fibrillation (4.1%); and suspected congenital heart disease in two (2.1%). TEE examination yielded additional information and helped in the therapeutic decision in 88 patients (90.7%), leading to a diagnosis in 49 (50.6%), which was different from the initial diagnostic hypothesis in four, and exclusion of the suspected diagnosis in 39 (40.1%). There was only one minor complication (1.0%) and no TEE-related mortality. We concluded that transesophageal echocardiography is an extremely useful and safe cardiovascular diagnostic technique in an emergency setting in a district general hospital, enabling a diagnosis to be reached or excluded in almost all patients, which is essential for implementing appropriate therapy.

Pulmonary embolism associated with a large tricuspid-related mass.

The case of a 43-year-old man with diabetes and alcoholism admitted to the emergency room with shock, fever, pleuritic chest pain and systemic symptoms is presented. Laboratory tests revealed anemia, leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, high sedimentation rate and D-dimers, hypoxemia and hypocapnea. He also had sinus tachycardia, rSR' in V1 and an opacity on the periphery of the right pulmonary field. Blood and urine cultures were negative, as were serological markers. The echocardiogram showed a large mass adhering to the tricuspid valve, suggestive of myxoma. The patient underwent surgery, and anatomopathological examination of the mass showed it to be a bacterial vegetation, with no agent isolated. It is pointed out that differential diagnosis is difficult between a myxoma with systemic symptomatology associated with a possible pulmonary embolism, and tricuspid endocarditis with negative blood culture associated with a septic pulmonary embolism, which turned out to be the diagnosis in this patient.